Peer Reviews

docx

School

American Public University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

260

Subject

Communications

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by anhp0911

Report
Peer Reviews Aaron Luna, The introduction was very strong and set the tone for the rest of the paper. I think you did a great job providing detail and using Hanke’s quotes to strengthen your points. I think you added just enough quotes so that it’s not overwhelming, but adds to your paper. The research question was very easily identified in the first paragraph, but I didn’t see any thesis statement or anything detailing your stance on the topic. It’s a very worthwhile question and one that is prevalent in our society today because we rely on technology and social media. The body of the essay had plenty of different studies and data from scholars to substantiate the claims made that social media negatively affects interpersonal skills. The author stayed on topic and did a great job only including important information. Aaron did a great job with sourcing and making sure to not only qualify the source but give credit to each source that was used. The quotes used were strong and not overdone. They did a good job adding to the argument rather than distract or take away from the argument. There was some specialist language used, but Aaron did a great job explaining and creating understanding and not just putting unknown terms. Aaron only used a few specialist words which is great because it didn’t require as much explanation and was easily understood. Aaron did a great job making sure that the entire paper flowed smoothly, and utilized only relevant information and sources that presented concrete evidence rather than just filler information. I would like to have seen a little more on exactly what the negative effects were because throughout the only thing we get is that it leads to decreased interpersonal skills. What kind of skills are decreased? What are some alternatives that you suggest to help combat the problems? Overall, you did a great job on the paper Aaron, it was easy to follow, had great information and you did a good job allowing the reader to see your point of view, but make their judgements. Hello Jacob, The introduction was great, it was to the point and had some good material. I can gather from the introduction that your research question is somewhere along the lines of, Will brick-and-mortar retail stores exist in the future? Or something along those lines. I didn’t see where you directly stated the question for people to read. It might make your introduction much easier if you directly stated it so people understand what you’re speaking about. The paper itself was very focused and driving home the point that retail stores need to adapt and overcome if they’re going to continue to exist and thrive. The quotes used are well placed and over information that adds to the overall points being made and doesn’t just clutter the paper up. The use of the picture is great and helps add information to the paper, but I feel as though maybe an appendix where you reference that is better so that it doesn’t clutter up the paper. Jacob did a good job introducing different ideas like ARSAA and giving great definitions as well as examples of what it is and how it’s used. The specialized language didn’t seem overwhelming because Jacob did a great job explaining and putting it into normal terms for everyone reading. I didn’t have any trouble reading the paper at all, it flowed smoothly and was very clear from the start. I don’t think there
is much I would change except for maybe putting the research question somewhere in there followed by a thesis. This will allow us reading to know exactly what your answering, the research question, and what your stance on the topic is without having to guess or read the entire paper before coming to our conclusion. Besides those couple of things, I think you laid a solid foundation, built up from that and added plenty of information and great sources to substantiate, and had a great conclusion. One of the biggest criteria for the paper was clarity throughout, which you did an exceptional job. You had great transitions and provided data that helped build your paper up. The source information was synthesized very well and you even took your time to break down specifics so that it was easier to understand and follow. Great job overall.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help