Article Critique_ Part 2 QUESTIONS 1-3

pdf

School

Ball State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

630

Subject

Communications

Date

Jun 18, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

3

Uploaded by PurpleTurtle48

Report
Article Critique: Part 2 QUESTIONS 1-3 Due Jun 2 at 11:59pm Points 20 Questions 6 Time Limit None Attempt History Attempt Time Score LATEST Attempt 1 1,892 minutes 22 out of 20 Score for this quiz: 22 out of 20 Submitted Jun 2 at 11:22pm This attempt took 1,892 minutes. Question 1 2 / 0 pts Extra Credit (Earn up to 2 points): In your own words, summarize the feedback that your instructor provided to you for Article Critique 1. How will you use that feedback to improve your responses for this submission? In other words, what areas of weakness will you focus on improving? Your Answer:
The feedback has been acknowledged and there is an expectation that it will be implemented more efficiently for article critique 2. Question 2 3 / 3 pts What are the dependent variables? It is ok to list the dependent variables. An explanation is not needed for this question. Your Answer: The article primarily measured the dependent variables as follows: 1. Screaming - Scored using partial-interval recording and converted to percentage of intervals with screaming. 2. Other problem behavior - Included flopping, hitting, kicking, and throwing objects. Scored using event recording and converted to response rates (responses per minute). 3. Functional Communication Responses (FCRs) - Defined as recognizable vocal approximations or making contact with a communication card picturing toy cars. Prompted FCRs and independent FCRs were scored separately using event recording and converted to response rates. Question 3
5 / 5 pts Are the dependent variables clearly defined? Consider the operational definition, the appropriateness of the measurement system, and reliability (e.g., data collectors, IOA). Explain your rationale using citations from the textbook. Your Answer: The study explicitly defines the dependent variables and provides operational definitions for them. The utilized measurement systems seem suitable, and the stated interobserver agreement (IOA) values suggest a high level of dependability. According to Cooper et al. (2020), "A good operational definition states the Definition in terms of specific measurable behaviors." Detailed operational definitions are provided for each dependent variable: 1. Screaming: "vocalizations above conversation level, excluding vocal stereotypy" (Boyle, 2022). 2. Other problem behavior: "flopping (any part of James' torso contacting the ground), hitting (audible contact between James' hand and another person), kicking (contact between James' foot and another person from at least 6 in.), and throwing objects at people" (Boyle, 2022). 3. FCRs: "recognizable vocal approximations or James making contact with his hand to a communication card (5 cm by 10 cm) that displayed the word "cars" and a picture of toy cars" (Boyle, 2022). To summarize, the operational definitions are accurate, the measurement systems align with the observed patterns of response, and the stated levels of Interobserver Agreement (IOA) indicate a dependable measurement, in accordance with the recommended guidelines presented by Cooper et al. (2020).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help