RES 7480 Week 4 DQ 1

docx

School

Grand Canyon University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

7480

Subject

Chemistry

Date

May 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by BrigadierFreedom13974

Report
When gathering literature to establish evidence-based practices, researchers must prioritize their findings to determine which studies are stronger or weaker in relation to a particular problem or practice-based challenge. One of the primary methods is to assess the study design and methodology. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often considered the gold standard due to their ability to minimize bias and establish causality (Kang, 2016). Cohort studies, case-control studies, and systematic reviews also provide valuable insights but vary in terms of evidence strength. Additionally, the quality and rigor of the research should be evaluated by considering factors such as peer review, sample size, control groups, randomization, and blinding. Studies published in peer-reviewed journals with large sample sizes and rigorous methodologies are generally given higher priority. Furthermore, the relevance and applicability of the research findings to the specific context or population being studied are crucial. Researchers should ensure that the study’s context, setting, population, and interventions align closely with their own practice-based challenges (Shaheen et al., 2023). This involves checking for internal and external validity, consistency of results across different studies, and the practical significance of the effect size. Additionally, the credibility of the source and the recency of the publication play important roles in determining the reliability of the findings. Utilizing critical appraisal tools like the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool or PRISMA guidelines can help systematically evaluate the quality of the studies. By applying these criteria, researchers can ensure that they rely on the most rigorous, relevant, and reliable evidence to inform their practice, leading to more effective and evidence-based interventions. References: Kang, H. (2016). How to understand and conduct evidence-based medicine. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology , 69 (5), 435. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2016.69.5.435 Shaheen, N., Shaheen, A., Ramadan, A., Hefnawy, M. T., Ramadan, A., Ibrahim, I. A., Hassanein, M. E., Ashour, M. E., & Flouty, O. (2023). Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics , 8 . https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1268045
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help