HSA4140_MOD4_Guilefuss

COMPLYING WITH MARCA 3 mindful of complexity in understanding the MARCA guidelines. With that being said Dr. Doe’s office will need to make sure they read over the guidelines to ensure they understand. With this, the lack of data being obtained and the getting the appropriate quality data captured ( Pros and Cons of Quality Data Management , n.d.). Option 2: Some physicians have decided to affiliate with an ACO and participate in alternative payment models that would comply with the MARCA guidelines. Pros to option 2: Affiliating with an ACO can help providers with managing costs, but still providing the best high-quality care to patients ( Accountable Care and Accountable Care Organizations | CMS , n.d.). Also, with ACO’s they work quickly to ensure that health data exchange run smoothly between providers. Cons to option 2: The only con to this option is the data is no longer controlled by Dr. Doe, everyone has access and privacy is lost. Dr. Doe's Proposed Strategy Now Choose one of the options above as your recommendation: Recommendation: My recommendation is that Dr. Doe chooses some physicians who have decided to manage the quality data and report on their own. Based on the Strategic Initiative that you chose, define a goal for the physician: Goal: To make sure her practice looks best and minimize the likelihood of receiving a penalty on the practice reimbursement by providing more precise data by self-reporting.

COMPLYING WITH MARCA 6 Demonstrates accurate understanding and synthesis of assignment concepts by:  Meeting content standards  Identifying relevant points and main ideas that are organized and complete  Providing accurate and relevant information highlighting an understanding of material  Demonstrating original thought and personal reflection in relation to the concepts  Providing evidence to support thoughts, comments and opinions (e.g., source citations)  Content does not meet assignment standards  Information provided was inaccurate  Information presented in disorganized manner  Information presented in an incomplete manner  Demonstrates limited understanding of the material  No supportive evidence provided  Provides insufficient peer-reviewed resources (citations and references)  Demonstrates limited or no original thought and/or reflection  Content marginally meets assignment standards  Information presented was generally accurate  Information presented is minimally developed  Content presented in a disorganized manner  Information presented demonstrates only partial understanding of the material  Information is insufficiently supported with up-to- date, peer-reviewed resources  Demonstrates some original thought and/or reflection  Content sufficiently meets all assignment standards  Information presented is accurate  Information presented is adequately developed  Content presented is organized  Information presented demonstrates an adequate understanding of the material  Information is adequately supported with up- to-date, peer reviewed resources  Demonstrates original thought and reflection  Content exceeds all assignment standards  Information presented exceeds expectations of upper division course work  Information presented is well developed  Content presented is exceptionally well organized and comprehensive  Information presented demonstrates thorough understanding and application of the material  Information is thoroughly supported with up-to-date, peer reviewed resources  Demonstrates original thought and insightful connections 14 Component: Professionalism Unacceptable Marginally Meets Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Maximum Points Points Earned Demonstrates a commitment to academic integrity and professional standards by:  Meeting all assignment requirements completely  Maintaining academic integrity  Applying instructor feedback, when appropriate  Submitting work that is accurate and reflective of upper level scholarly expectations  Using professional language and terminology  Submitting work on time  Assignment requirements were not met  Did not adhere to principles of academic integrity  Work does not reflect correction of errors previously noted by instructor  Excessive errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA  Excessive use of unprofessional language, terminology or abbreviations (i.e. texting)  Key requirements of the assignment were missing  Adhered to principles of academic integrity  Works reflects only minimal correction of errors previously noted by instructor  Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA  Some use of unprofessional language, terminology or abbreviations (i.e. texting)  Key requirements of the assignment were met  Adhered to principles of academic integrity  Works reflects correction of the majority of errors previously noted by instructor  Minimal errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA  Language and terminology is professional and appropriate  Key requirements of the assignment were met  Adhered to principles of academic integrity  Works reflects correction of all errors previously noted by instructor  Accuracy with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA  Exceptional use of professional language and terminology 6 Total Points 20 Instructor Feedback Special Disclaimers:  1 point deduction for failure to use standard HSA file naming convention: course_assignment_lastname (i.e. HSA3104_timeline_smith)  1 point deduction for failure to include the assignment rubric. Abbreviated Late HSA Policy, please see your course syllabus for the full late policy:  Assignments submitted within 24 hours of due date – 50% deduction (graded score – 50%).  Assignments submitted after 24 hours are not accepted for credit. Academic Integrity: All academic work submitted to satisfy course requirements is expected to be the student’s OWN work.  All instances of plagiarism will be forwarded to the Dean for review and possible academic discipline.