Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, company H is one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in company H board of directors. The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, CEO of company H, started secret surveillance on board of member and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and termination of person D. The company then selected Person H as the new CEO under whom the company grew financially strong but Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at company H sponsored events which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA as CEO who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue. The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP and more problem aroused when an outside firm proposed Person AP as CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of company H board. Person MW, led the company as CEO and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017. To identify: Whether its CEO, the board of directors or both has to be blamed for company H’s shareholder value destruction and determine whether any recourse do the shareholders have.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter MC, Problem 21.1DQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, company H is one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in company H board of directors.

The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, CEO of company H, started secret surveillance on board of member and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and termination of person D.

The company then selected Person H as the new CEO under whom the company grew financially strong but Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at company H sponsored events which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA as CEO who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue.

The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP and more problem aroused when an outside firm proposed Person AP as CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of company H board. Person MW, led the company as CEO and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017.

To identify: Whether its CEO, the board of directors or both has to be blamed for company H’s shareholder value destruction and determine whether any recourse do the shareholders have.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Summarize Walmart Inc. Who is it? What does it do? Who does it do it to? Propose the social cause for Walmart Inc. and how it supports the mission, vision, and values of Walmart Inc. Analyze the key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT). How does the proposed social cause support the strengths and opportunities of Walmart Inc while helping Walmart Inc to overcome its weaknesses and threats. Assess the ethical principles and frameworks used in making the selection. Include a discussion of the internal and the external impacts that expect to make with this choice. Evaluate any ethical challenges this social cause might present to employees. Justify why it is important for Walmart Inc. to actively participate in a CSR program and promote a global citizenship effort, including the contribution of the proposed social cause.

Response to isaiah Describe the conflicting motivations in the mixed motive nature of negotiation? It is important to understand that in mixed motive negotiations, these type of negotiations combine a number of aspects containing both that of integrative and distributive approaches. In addition to this, these types of negotiations aim to create additional value for all of the parties involved in the negotiation bargaining process, but one must understand that these may not be enough for everyone within the process to get everything they want out of these negotiations. Thus, and based upon the aforementioned information, there will always be some type of conflicting motivations based upon the mixed motive nature of negotiation. What are some options available during negotiation with a ZOPA? One of the options within the Zone of Possible Agreement is to always go back to the negotiation table and continue to try to work out any additional values that will benefit both sides of the…

What are some options available during negotiation with a ZOPA?