Housing trends. The 2000 census reported that 66.4 % of the households in Alaska were homeowners, and the remainder were renters. During the next decade, 37.2 % of the homeowners became renters, and the rest continued to be homeowners. Similarly, 71.5 % of the renters became homeowners, and the rest continued to rent. (A) Write the appropriate transition matrix. (B) According to this transition matrix, what percentage of households were homeowners in 2010 ? (C) If the transition matrix remains the same, what percentage of households will be homeowners in 2030 ?
Housing trends. The 2000 census reported that 66.4 % of the households in Alaska were homeowners, and the remainder were renters. During the next decade, 37.2 % of the homeowners became renters, and the rest continued to be homeowners. Similarly, 71.5 % of the renters became homeowners, and the rest continued to rent. (A) Write the appropriate transition matrix. (B) According to this transition matrix, what percentage of households were homeowners in 2010 ? (C) If the transition matrix remains the same, what percentage of households will be homeowners in 2030 ?
Solution Summary: The author calculates the transition matrix P when in 2000, 66.4% of households in Alaska were households with homeowners and the rest were renters.
Housing trends. The
2000
census reported that
66.4
%
of the households in Alaska were homeowners, and the remainder were renters. During the next decade,
37.2
%
of the homeowners became renters, and the rest continued to be homeowners. Similarly,
71.5
%
of the renters became homeowners, and the rest continued to rent.
(A) Write the appropriate transition matrix.
(B) According to this transition matrix, what percentage of households were homeowners in
2010
?
(C) If the transition matrix remains the same, what percentage of households will be homeowners in
2030
?
Topic 2
Evaluate S
x
dx, using u-substitution. Then find the integral using
1-x2
trigonometric substitution. Discuss the results!
Topic 3
Explain what an elementary anti-derivative is. Then consider the following
ex
integrals: fed dx
x
1
Sdx
In x
Joseph Liouville proved that the first integral does not have an elementary anti-
derivative Use this fact to prove that the second integral does not have an
elementary anti-derivative. (hint: use an appropriate u-substitution!)
1. Given the vector field F(x, y, z) = -xi, verify the relation
1
V.F(0,0,0) = lim
0+ volume inside Se
ff F• Nds
SE
where SE is the surface enclosing a cube centred at the origin and having edges of length 2€. Then,
determine if the origin is sink or source.
4
3
2
-5 4-3 -2 -1
1 2 3 4 5
12
23
-4
The function graphed above is:
Increasing on the interval(s)
Decreasing on the interval(s)
Chapter 9 Solutions
Pearson eText for Finite Mathematics for Business, Economics, Life Sciences, and Social Sciences -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
Calculus for Business, Economics, Life Sciences, and Social Sciences (14th Edition)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.