Going stag. Two Englishmen, Neville and Winston, go hunting. Each may choose to hunt a hare or a stag but must make a choice without knowing the other’s decision. A solo hunter will catch a hare easily, but it takes both hunters in cooperation to catch a stag, the more valuable prey. The payoff matrix from Winston’s point of view is given below.
Find the Nash equilibrium point for this game. Is this point truly optimal for both hunters?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 8 Solutions
The Heart of Mathematics: An Invitation to Effective Thinking
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Excursions in Modern Mathematics (9th Edition)
Finite Mathematics for Business, Economics, Life Sciences and Social Sciences
Mathematical Ideas (13th Edition) - Standalone book
Mathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activities (5th Edition)
Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences
Mathematics with Applications In the Management, Natural, and Social Sciences (12th Edition)
- In a two-player, one-shot simultaneous-move game each player can choose strategy A or strategy B. If both players choose strategy A, each earns a payoff of $400. If both players choose strategy B, each earns a payoff of $200. If player 1 chooses strategy A and player 2 chooses strategy B, then player 1 earns $100 and player 2 earns $600. If player 1 chooses strategy B and player 2 chooses strategy A, then player 1 earns $600 and player 2 earns $100.a. Write the above game in normal form. Player 1 Player 2 Strategy A B A $ , $ $ , $ B $ , $ $ , $ b. Find each player’s dominant strategy, if it exists.Player 1's dominant strategy: B no dominant strategy exists A .Player 2's dominant strategy: B no dominant strategy exists A .c. Find the Nash equilibrium of this game. (A,A) (B,A) (A,B) (B,B) d. Which strategy pair has the highest aggregate payoff? (B,A) (A,B) (B,B) (A,A) e. Can the outcome with the highest aggregate payoff be…arrow_forward3arrow_forward9arrow_forward
- When it comes to customs clearance of goods, customs officers and smugglers try to prevent the otherparty from predicting their respective intentions. Their respective profit metrics are as follows:■There is no general Nash equilibrium (pure strategy).■Question: What is the mixed strategy equilibrium? – find out x and yarrow_forwardGAME 5 Player B B1 B2 Player A A1 7,3 5, 10 A2 3, 8 9, 6 In Game 5 above, in the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies O player B chooses B1 with a 60% probability. O player B chooses B1 with a 30% probability. O player B chooses B1 with a 50% probability. O player B chooses B1 with a 75% probability.arrow_forward2. Two friends are playing poker with one another and need to decide on how to play their next tum. The payoffs in this game are as shown in the following payoff matrix: Player 2 Fold All-in Fold (-20,-30) (-20,100) Player 1 All-in (120,-30) (-80,-150) Determine the mixed-strategy Nash Equilibrium for this game.arrow_forward
- Subject:arrow_forwardAmazon faces the other group (Other), which consists of e-book manufacturers other than Amazon, in a game in which the players choose a format (either Amazon's format, AZW, or the other group's format, EPUB), as the profit matrix Other shows AZW EPUB What are the pure-strategy Nash equilibria if the firms choose their formats simultaneously and are free to choose either format? Is there a mixed-strategy equilibrium? AZW Determine the pure-strategy Nash equilibria for this game. O A. This game has no Nash equilibria. Amazon O B. The Nash equilibrium is for Amazon and the other group to select the AZW format. EPUB OC. The Nash equilibria are for Amazon and the other group to select different formats. O D. The Nash equilibrium is for Amazon and the other group to select the EPUB format E. The Nash equilibria are for Amazon and the other group to select the same format Determine the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium for this game. The mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium is for Amazon to select…arrow_forwardThe Chinese government has created a fund worth more than 20 trillion won to foster the semiconductorindustry. Although there is a large technological difference between memory semiconductors, systemsemiconductors can be developed in a short period of time. The number of companies producinghomogeneous quality products has increased.■Question (a) In the Cournot game, when the number of firms increases from 2 to n, compare the output,total output, and profit of each firm with N.E. in the Cournot model. ■Question (b) If the number of companies participating in the semiconductor market increases to infinity,that is, in a perfectly competitive market, what will be the equilibrium point?arrow_forward
- Find the optimum strategies for player A and player B in the following game. Find the value of the game. (Be sure to look for a saddle point first.) Find the optimum strategy for player A. Choose the correct answer below and fill in the answer box(es) to complete your choice. OA. The game is strictly determined. Player A should choose row (Type a whole number.) B. The game is not strictly determined. Player A should choose row 1 with probability and row 2 with probability (Type integers or simplified fractions.) Find the optimum strategy for player B. Choose the correct answer below and fill in the answer box(es) to complete your choice. OA. The game is not strictly determined. Player B should choose column 1 with probability (Type integers or simplified fractions.) B. The game is strictly determined. Player B should choose column (Type a whole number.) The value of the game is (Type an integer or a simplified fraction.) and column 2 with probabilityarrow_forwardQuestion 12 Game Theory 1 The University of Wyoming and Colorado State University both consider their advertising strategy. They can choose high, medium or low levels of advertising and their pay-offs are given in the matrix below. 1. Circle their best responses in the pay-off matrix. 2. Does either university have a dominant strategy? 3. What is the Nash Equilibrium? Colorado State University High Medium Low 10 15 45 High 15 UW 15 Medium 10 30 25 35 Low 15 35 25 25 20 30 20 25arrow_forwardAang and Bolin are playing a simultaneous-move game where they seek to maximize their utility functions. Assume that Aang chooses strategy a and Bolin chooses strategy 6 and that their strategy spaces are continuous. Their utility functions are: • Aang's utility: UA=-a(a – b- 2) Bolin's utility: UB = -b(b- a - 8) What is the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in this game? Write Aang's choice for a in blank #1 and Bolin's choice for b in blank #2. Blank # 1 Blank # 2arrow_forward
- Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...MathISBN:9781259676512Author:Kenneth H RosenPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationMathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...MathISBN:9780134392790Author:Beckmann, SybillaPublisher:PEARSON
- Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)MathISBN:9780134683713Author:Robert F. BlitzerPublisher:PEARSONDiscrete Mathematics With ApplicationsMathISBN:9781337694193Author:EPP, Susanna S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)MathISBN:9781259985607Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. MercerPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education