
Concept explainers
Consider the following class declaration:
public class Thing
{
private int x;
private int y;
private static int z = 0;
public Thing()
{
x = z;
y = z;
}
static void putThing(int a)
{
z = a;
}
}
Assume a program containing the class declaration defines three Thing objects with the following statements:
Thing one = new Thing();
Thing two = new Thing();
Thing three = new Thing();
- a. How many separate instances of the x member exist?
- b. How many separate instances of the y member exist?
- c. How many separate instances of the z member exist?
- d. What value will be stored in the x and y members of each object?
- e. Write a statement that will call the putThing method.

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 8 Solutions
Starting Out With Java: From Control Structures Through Objects, Student Value Edition (7th Edition)
Additional Engineering Textbook Solutions
Database Concepts (8th Edition)
Starting Out with Java: From Control Structures through Data Structures (4th Edition) (What's New in Computer Science)
INTERNATIONAL EDITION---Engineering Mechanics: Statics, 14th edition (SI unit)
SURVEY OF OPERATING SYSTEMS
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Modern Database Management
- Need help with coding in this in python!arrow_forwardIn the diagram, there is a green arrow pointing from Input C (complete data) to Transformer Encoder S_B, which I don’t understand. The teacher model is trained on full data, but S_B should instead receive missing data—this arrow should not point there. Please verify and recreate the diagram to fix this issue. Additionally, the newly created diagram should meet the same clarity standards as the second diagram (Proposed MSCATN). Finally provide the output image of the diagram in image format .arrow_forwardPlease provide me with the output image of both of them . below are the diagrams code make sure to update the code and mentionned clearly each section also the digram should be clearly describe like in the attached image. please do not provide the same answer like in other question . I repost this question because it does not satisfy the requirment I need in terms of clarifty the output of both code are not very well details I have two diagram : first diagram code graph LR subgraph Teacher Model (Pretrained) Input_Teacher[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Prediction[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Features[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_A_Model[Student Model A (Handles Missing Values)] Input_Student_A[Input M (Data with Missing Values)] --> Student_A_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Prediction[Student A Prediction y_A] Student_A_Encoder…arrow_forward
- Why I need ?arrow_forwardHere are two diagrams. Make them very explicit, similar to Example Diagram 3 (the Architecture of MSCTNN). graph LR subgraph Teacher_Model_B [Teacher Model (Pretrained)] Input_Teacher_B[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder_B[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder_B --> Teacher_Prediction_B[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder_B --> Teacher_Features_B[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_B_Model [Student Model B (Handles Missing Labels)] Input_Student_B[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Student_B_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_B] Student_B_Encoder --> Student_B_Prediction[Student B Prediction y_B] end subgraph Knowledge_Distillation_B [Knowledge Distillation (Student B)] Teacher_Prediction_B -- Logits Distillation Loss (L_logits_B) --> Total_Loss_B Teacher_Features_B -- Feature Alignment Loss (L_feature_B) --> Total_Loss_B Partial_Labels_B[Partial Labels y_p] -- Prediction Loss (L_pred_B) --> Total_Loss_B Total_Loss_B -- Backpropagation -->…arrow_forwardPlease provide me with the output image of both of them . below are the diagrams code I have two diagram : first diagram code graph LR subgraph Teacher Model (Pretrained) Input_Teacher[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Prediction[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Features[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_A_Model[Student Model A (Handles Missing Values)] Input_Student_A[Input M (Data with Missing Values)] --> Student_A_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Prediction[Student A Prediction y_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Features[Student A Features F_A] end subgraph Knowledge_Distillation_A [Knowledge Distillation (Student A)] Teacher_Prediction -- Logits Distillation Loss (L_logits_A) --> Total_Loss_A Teacher_Features -- Feature Alignment Loss (L_feature_A) --> Total_Loss_A Ground_Truth_A[Ground Truth y_gt] -- Prediction Loss (L_pred_A)…arrow_forward
- Programming Logic & Design ComprehensiveComputer ScienceISBN:9781337669405Author:FARRELLPublisher:CengageEBK JAVA PROGRAMMINGComputer ScienceISBN:9781337671385Author:FARRELLPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENTSystems ArchitectureComputer ScienceISBN:9781305080195Author:Stephen D. BurdPublisher:Cengage Learning
- C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program...Computer ScienceISBN:9781337102087Author:D. S. MalikPublisher:Cengage LearningMicrosoft Visual C#Computer ScienceISBN:9781337102100Author:Joyce, Farrell.Publisher:Cengage Learning,EBK JAVA PROGRAMMINGComputer ScienceISBN:9781305480537Author:FARRELLPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT




