CASE STUDY| Fish tales Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions. Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 6, Problem 1CS

CASE STUDY| Fish tales

Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions.

Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

unu grow because auxin is still produced in the tip to Another of Boysen and Jensen's experiments included the use of mica, explain why one of the shoots was able to show phototropism and the other was not. Mica Wafer Ligh c. They then t but this time permeable n shoot. Why phototropis Light Mica Wafer Coleoptile tips Tips removed: agar Explain why the shoo direction after the ag the cut shoot, even t

Discussion entries must be at least 250 words to fulfill the assignment requirements. You must complete your entry before you will be able to see the responses of other students. Responses to other students are encouraged but not required. Grading for discussion entries will be based on application of course concepts, proper grammar, and correct punctuation. Read one the attached article and explore the Human Development Index (https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI). In your opinion, is the Human Development Index a good measure of the well- being of the people of a nation? Are the items measured in the HDI valid and relevant in the modern global economy? How are they related to the political economy of a nation? The attached articles propose some alternative measures of well-being. In your opinion, are there other measures of well-being that might be better alternatives to the items in the current HDI?

A patient visits her doctor with symptoms typical of a bladder infection. She is immediately prescribed an 800 mgdose of antibiotic (bioavailability = 1/2, t½ = 12 h). The corresponding plasma concentration of drug is found to be 96 micrograms/ml. What is the volume of distribution of this drug? Please round to the nearest liter.

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 6, Problem 1CS

CASE STUDY| Fish tales

Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions.

Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 6, Problem 1CS

CASE STUDY| Fish tales

Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions.

Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 6, Problem 1CS

CASE STUDY| Fish tales

Aquatic vegetation overgrowth, usually controlled by dredging or herbicides, represents a significant issue in maintaining private and public waterways. In 1963, diploid grass carp were introduced in Arkansas to consume vegetation, but they reproduced prodigiously and spread to eventually become a hazard to aquatic ecosystems in 35 states. In the 1980s, many states adopted triploid grass carp as an alternative because of their high, but not absolute, sterility and their longevity of seven to ten years. Today, most states require permits for vegetation control by triploid carp, requiring their containment in the body of water to which they are introduced. Genetic modifications of organisms to achieve specific outcomes willcertainly become more common in the future and raise several interesting questions.

Taking triploid carp as an example, what controversies may emerge as similar modified species become available for widespread use?

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.

Conclusion

Thus, it can be concluded that GMOs are effective and necessary to be used in the modern world but it also has certain drawbacks.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Summary Introduction

To review:

The controversies that emerge from using modified species available for widespread use, keeping in mind the case of triploid grass carp.

Introduction:

There exist aquatic weeds which is harmful to the survival of other species. Grass carp are genetically modified so that it could wipe away the population of these weeds. These genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are made to be survived for a longer time, for about a period of five to ten years.

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

Grass carp is a genetically modified fish which is used for controlling aquatic weed but there are also few controversies associated with their use-

1) Incorrect insertion of the gene of interest- During the insertion of the gene of interest, there might occur some undesirable changes in the functionality of organism as while creating triploid grass carp, they may harm aquatic vegetation without disrupting the weed population.

2) Harmful to the environment- Due to gene insertion, the modified organism may start producing toxic substances and releasing it in the environment, affecting the environment negatively. For example- some portion of weed eaten by modified grass carp may not be completely digested and excreted to further cause algal blooms.

3) Resistance by pests and weeds towards the GMOs:A prolonged use of genetically modified organisms against insects, pests or weeds, may cause the development of resistance in these organisms against the GMOs. Hence, the GMOs should be used carefully against other organisms.

4) Disruption to biodiversity and vegetation: If a wide population of a particular species is wiped out then this would disrupt the biodiversity and vegetation of that place. For example- if triploid grass carp starts eating the useful aquatic vegetation along with the weeds then this will pose a harmful impact on the aquatic environment.

5) Harmful to human health- In some cases, GMOs have shown to leave behind toxic substances which cannot be degraded when such substances contaminate a region then it may be later consumed by humans which would result in serious health problems.