A manager is trying to decide whether to purchase a certain part or to have it produced internally. Internal production could use either of two processes. One would entail a variable cost of $17 per unit and an annual fixed cost of $200,000; the other would entail a variable cost of $14 per unit and an annual fixed cost of $240,000. Three vendors are willing to provide the part. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit for any volune up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit for demand of 1,000 units or less, and $18 per unit for larger quantities. Vendor C offers a price of $21 per unit for the first 1,000 units, and $19 per unit for additional units.
a)
To determine: The best alternative from a cost standpoint for an annual volume of 10,000 units and 20,000 units.
Introduction: Decision-making is the process that helps to make decision. It is the process of choosing a best alternative by evaluating many alternatives.
Answer to Problem 8P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A manager has to decide whether to purchase a product or produce it internally. Internal production consists of two processes. Variable cost and fixed cost of the first process is $17 and $200,000 respectively. Variable cost and fixed cost of the second process is $14 and $240,000 respectively.
There are three vendors available to purchase a product. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit if the demand is 1,000 units or less and $18 for larger volumes. Vendor C has a price of $21 per unit for first 1,000 units and $19 per unit for additional units.
Determine the best alternative from a cost standpoint for an annual volume of 10,000 units:
Calculate the total cost for the first internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 10,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $370,000.
Calculate the total cost for the second internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 10,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $380,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor A:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. Hence, the total cost for Vendor A is $200,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor B:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $22 if the volume is less than 1,000 and $18 if the volume is larger. As the annual volume is more than 1,000, the price is $18. Hence, the total cost for Vendor B is $180,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor C:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $21 for the volume up to 1,000 and $19 for the additional volume. Thus, price is $21 for the 1,000 units and $19 for additional 9,000 units. Hence, the total cost for Vendor C is $192,000.
At the annual volume of 10,000 units, Vendor B has the lowest total cost of ($180,000). Hence, it should be chosen from a cost standpoint.
Determine the best alternative from a cost standpoint for an annual volume of 20,000 units:
Calculate the total cost for the first internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 20,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $540,000.
Calculate the total cost for the second internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 20,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $520,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor A:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. Hence, the total cost for Vendor A is $400,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor B:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $22 if the volume is less than 1,000 and $18 if the volume is larger. As the annual volume is more than 1,000, the price is $18. Hence, the total cost for Vendor B is $360,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor C:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $21 for the volume up to 1,000 and $19 for the additional volume. Thus, price is $21 for the 1,000 units and $19 for additional 19,000 units. Hence, the total cost for Vendor C is $382,000.
At the annual volume of 20,000 units, Vendor B has the lowest total cost of ($360,000). Hence, it should be chosen from a cost standpoint.
b)
To determine: The range of the best alternative.
Introduction:Decision-making is the process that helps to make decision. It is the process of choosing a best alternative by evaluating many alternatives.
Answer to Problem 8P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A manager has to decide whether to purchase a product or produce it internally. Internal production consists of two processes. Variable cost and fixed cost of the first process is $17 and $200,000 respectively. Variable cost and fixed cost of the second process is $14 and $240,000 respectively.
There are three vendors available to purchase a product. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit if the demand is 1,000 units or less and $18 for larger volumes. Vendor C has a price of $21 per unit for first 1,000 units and $19 per unit for additional units.
Cost function for each alternative if the annual volume is 1-1,000 units:
First internal process:
Second internal process:
Vendor A:
Vendor B:
Vendor C:
When considering the cost functions, Vendor A would exhibit less cost when compare to Vendor B and Vendor C. Vendor A should be preferred over other alternatives. The graph is as follows:
Cost function for each alternative if the annual volume is more than 1,000 units:
First internal process:
Second internal process:
Vendor A:
Vendor B:
Vendor C:
When considering the cost functions, Vendor B would dominate Vendor A and Vendor C. Hence, Vendor A and Vendor C should be eliminated. The graph considering two internal processes and Vendor B is as follows:
Determine the value of Q by equaling two cost equations:
Equal the cost function of second internal process and Vendor B to determine the value of Q.
Calculate the total cost of first internal process:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of first internal process. Hence, the total cost is $1,220,000.
Calculate the total cost of second internal process:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of second internal process. Hence, the total cost is $1,080,000.
Calculate the total cost of Vendor A:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of Vendor A. Hence, the total cost is $1,200,000.
Calculate the total cost of Vendor B:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of Vendor B. Hence, the total cost is $1,080,000.
Calculate the total cost of Vendor C:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of Vendor C. Hence, the total cost is $1,142,000.
Inference:
- Vendor A should be preferred when the purchasing quantity ranges from 1 to 1,000 units.
- Vendor B should be preferred when the purchasing quantity ranges from 1,001 to 59,999 units.
- There would indifferent between Vendor B and second internal process if the quantity is 60,000 units.
- Second internal process should be preferred if the quantity is more than 60,000 units.
First internal process and Vendor C are never best.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
Operations Management
- The results of your four plans will provide an indicative EOQ value. State this value and discuss in a precise manner, why it is not the exact, true value. Additional calculations in the form of plans E, F etc. may also assist your explanation of the EOQ and can be includedarrow_forwardi). Complete the table assuming a Level production plan. ii) Comment on your results and explain whether at this stage, you consider a Level plan is a suitable approach for this particular business. Your comment should include reference to a calculated ‘fill rate’.arrow_forwardIn the following sawtooth inventory profile diagram, two inventory plans with different order quantities (Q) and different frequencies of delivery are shown; order quantity for Plan A = 200 units and Plan B = 50 units. i). Total demand (D) is 350 units, the holding cost per unit (Ch) is equal to (£0.8) and the ordering cost per order (Co) is (£12.5). Calculate the total costs for each plan and state which one is more preferable along with the reason why. ii). There is a stark difference in the composition of the total costs of Plans A and B. Explain this difference and why it occurs. Use the breakdown of costs for each plan to help illustrate your answer.arrow_forward
- i). Complete the table for a Chase production plan. ii). Explain whether a Level or Chase plan is more suitable for the demand pattern experienced by this particular business, which incidentally relies on highly skilled workers in the production process. Assume a starting workforce of 7 and that fractional workers are permissible. You should support your answer with numerical data derived from Table 3. In comparing the costs, state any other assumptions made.arrow_forwardi). Complete for a Chase production plan. ii). Explain whether a Level or Chase plan is more suitable for the demand pattern experienced by this particular business, which incidentally relies on highly skilled workers in the production process. Assume a starting workforce of 7 and that fractional workers are permissible.arrow_forwardComplete the table for a Chase production plan.arrow_forward
- How much can the garden centre expect to sell during each quarter of next year (Year 3) accounting for seasonality? Your forecast must make use of seasonal indices. All workings must be shown in full. (NOTE: Please round your calculations to three decimal places).arrow_forwardPS.53 Brother I.D. Ricks is a faculty member at BYU-Idaho whose grandchildren live in Oklahoma and California. He and his wife would like to visit their grandchildren at least once a year in these states. They currently have one vehicle with well over 100,000 miles on it, so they want to buy a newer vehicle with fewer miles and that gets better gas mileage. They are considering two options: (1) a new subcompact car that would cost $18,750 to purchase or (2) a used sedan that would cost $12,750.They anticipate that the new subcompact would get 37 miles per gallon (combined highway and around town driving) while the sedan would get 26 miles per gallon. Based on their road tripping history they expect to drive 13,000 miles per year. For the purposes of their analysis they are assuming that gas will cost $2.93 per gallon.Question: How many miles would the Ricks need to drive before the cost of these two options would be the same? (Display your answer to the nearest whole number.) (Hint:…arrow_forwardTisjTzktxyduduarrow_forward
- Not use ai pleasearrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forwardWhat is Bitcoin? How important is it to businesses and individuals? How does it cause environmental damage and is that damage worth continued uses of Bitcoin? Read the following articles to help answer these questions: United Nations University. (2023, October 24). UN study reveals the hidden environmental impacts of bitcoin: Carbon is not the only harmful by-product. https://unu.edu/press-release/un-study-reveals-hidden-environmental-impacts-bitcoin-carbon-not-only-harmful-product#:~:text=Bitcoin%2C%20the%20most%20popular%20cryptocurrency,the%20worldwide%20Bitcoin%20mining%20network. Salam, E. (2023, April 26). Bitcoin is terrible for the environment – can it ever go green? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/apr/26/bitcoin-mining-climate-crisis-environmental-impactarrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational PublishingPurchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Contemporary MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033777Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. KurtzPublisher:Cengage Learning