Management, 13Th Edition
Management, 13Th Edition
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780133910292
Author: Stephen P. Robbins & Mary A. Coulter
Publisher: PEARSON
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 5, Problem 1RDQ
Summary Introduction

To explain:

The importance of having a clear explanation of the diversity entertained by the organization.

Introduction:

Diversity has been a term much heard of during the past few decades within organizational contexts. Workforce diversity is the means by which people within work settings are either different from each other or similar to each other. Aspects such as age, race and gender that diversify people in terms of demographic elements are known as surface-level diversity. When people mingle with each other more and more, the differences mentioned above become less important and deeper differences start showing up. Such differences are known as deep-level diversity. Differences in values and beliefs, preferences et cetera are some examples for deep-level diversity.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted fact that every human being is unique. Hence, no matter how similar people are in terms of age, gender, race or any other aspect, they would still be diverse. However, two major levels of diversity have been identified by experts. Surface-level diversity is the differences in demographic elements such as gender, religion, nationality et cetera. Deep-level diversity shall be brought into light as people get to know each other better. Differences in opinions, values and morals in life are some examples of deep-level diversity. Within organizational settings, diversity is a much prevalent and visible factor.

It is important for an organization to exactly know the level of diversity prevailing within their organizational domain. By doing so, an organization could create a culture where differences are accepted, which shall be sustainable. Further, differences shall be much instrumental in pooling up diverse ideas. Openness to such diverse ideas shall be facilitated if the depth of diversity within the firm is made clear. Within a much competitive business context, organizations tend to widen their boundaries to other countries and regions. If the organization maintains a much diversified workforce, it would be advantageous in better understanding the requirements of countries and regions they are planning to move to. This would ultimately create a competitive edge for the organization.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
This week we will be building a regression model conceptually for our discussion assignment. Consider your current workplace (or previous/future workplace if not currently working) and answer the following set of questions. Expand where needed to help others understand your thinking: What are other potential dependent variables in this context? Consider your dependent variable of choice. What are all the factors you can think of that can help predict it?
Do you think Ms. Browne Sanders had the basis for a sexual harassment suit? Why?             I believe that Ms. Browne Sanders did in fact have the basis for a sexual harassment suit because her claims of retaliation from management after coming out about the verbal abuse and sexual harassment from her superiors, to me, are proven by her being let go shortly after bringing them to light. Not only that, but the jury found her case compelling enough to award her the $11 million (Sandomir, 2007). Sexual harassment cases like this are hard to make due to the reliance on the credibility of those involved (the victim and the perpetrator), one of which has it in his best interest to deny the claims outright. This leaves the victim in a vulnerable situation where retaliation can occur, such as this, because of the “he said she said” nature of the issue. A study done in 2023 showed the decline of women who report their harassment from 66% the previous year down to 59% (Cox, 2023). This was…
Do you think Ms. Browne Sanders had the basis for a sexual harassment suit? Why? I think Ms. Browne Sanders had a valid basis for a sexual harassment suit against the New York Knicks and her coach. The jury found that she was harassed and that the Knicks retaliated against her for it. According to the New York Times article, the evidence used in court showed a pattern of inappropriate behavior by Thomas, and this created a hostile work environment for her. Sexual harassment cases often use circumstantial evidence rather than direct proof, as harassment usually doesn't leave much concrete evidence. The Employee Rights Attorney Group article explains that harassment is illegal if it changes an employee's work conditions, making it difficult to do their job. Browne Sanders’ case cleared this bar, as she lost her job after reporting the harassment. Her claims were credible because a jury determined that the Knicks organization failed to address the issue appropriately. Retaliation can also…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Principles of Management
Management
ISBN:9780998625768
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College
Text book image
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:South-Western College Pub