DATABASE SYSTEMS (LOOSELEAF)-W/MINDTAP
13th Edition
ISBN: 9781337761833
Author: Coronel
Publisher: CENGAGE L
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Expert Solution & Answer
Chapter 5, Problem 17RQ
Explanation of Solution
Design trap:
- One of the most common design traps is “fan trap” when the user contains one entity in two one-to-many relationship to another entities that time fan trap is occurred.
- Thus producing an association among other entities that is not expressed in the model.
- When the relationship is identified as incorrect or improper model at that time design trap is occurred.
- So, the design trap is represented in a way that is not consistent with the real world.
Example:
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Whats wrong the pseudocode here??
Whats wrong the pseudocode here?
How do I answer this python coding question here? Code provided
Chapter 5 Solutions
DATABASE SYSTEMS (LOOSELEAF)-W/MINDTAP
Ch. 5 - Prob. 1RQCh. 5 - What kinds of data would you store in an entity...Ch. 5 - Prob. 3RQCh. 5 - What is a subtype discriminator? Give an example...Ch. 5 - Prob. 5RQCh. 5 - What is a disjoint subtype? Give an example.Ch. 5 - What is the difference between partial...Ch. 5 - Prob. 8RQCh. 5 - According to the data model, is it required that...Ch. 5 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 5 - Prob. 11RQCh. 5 - Prob. 12RQCh. 5 - Prob. 13RQCh. 5 - Prob. 14RQCh. 5 - When implementing a 1:1 relationship, where should...Ch. 5 - What is time-variant data, and how would you deal...Ch. 5 - Prob. 17RQCh. 5 - Prob. 1PCh. 5 - Prob. 2PCh. 5 - Prob. 3PCh. 5 - Prob. 4PCh. 5 - Prob. 5PCh. 5 - Prob. 6PCh. 5 - Prob. 7PCh. 5 - Prob. 8CCh. 5 - Prob. 9CCh. 5 - Prob. 10C
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In the diagram, there is a green arrow pointing from Input C (complete data) to Transformer Encoder S_B, which I don’t understand. The teacher model is trained on full data, but S_B should instead receive missing data—this arrow should not point there. Please verify and recreate the diagram to fix this issue. Additionally, the newly created diagram should meet the same clarity standards as the second diagram (Proposed MSCATN). Finally provide the output image of the diagram in image format .arrow_forwardPlease provide me with the output image of both of them . below are the diagrams code make sure to update the code and mentionned clearly each section also the digram should be clearly describe like in the attached image. please do not provide the same answer like in other question . I repost this question because it does not satisfy the requirment I need in terms of clarifty the output of both code are not very well details I have two diagram : first diagram code graph LR subgraph Teacher Model (Pretrained) Input_Teacher[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Prediction[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Features[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_A_Model[Student Model A (Handles Missing Values)] Input_Student_A[Input M (Data with Missing Values)] --> Student_A_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Prediction[Student A Prediction y_A] Student_A_Encoder…arrow_forwardWhy I need ?arrow_forward
- Here are two diagrams. Make them very explicit, similar to Example Diagram 3 (the Architecture of MSCTNN). graph LR subgraph Teacher_Model_B [Teacher Model (Pretrained)] Input_Teacher_B[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder_B[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder_B --> Teacher_Prediction_B[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder_B --> Teacher_Features_B[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_B_Model [Student Model B (Handles Missing Labels)] Input_Student_B[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Student_B_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_B] Student_B_Encoder --> Student_B_Prediction[Student B Prediction y_B] end subgraph Knowledge_Distillation_B [Knowledge Distillation (Student B)] Teacher_Prediction_B -- Logits Distillation Loss (L_logits_B) --> Total_Loss_B Teacher_Features_B -- Feature Alignment Loss (L_feature_B) --> Total_Loss_B Partial_Labels_B[Partial Labels y_p] -- Prediction Loss (L_pred_B) --> Total_Loss_B Total_Loss_B -- Backpropagation -->…arrow_forwardPlease provide me with the output image of both of them . below are the diagrams code I have two diagram : first diagram code graph LR subgraph Teacher Model (Pretrained) Input_Teacher[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Prediction[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Features[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_A_Model[Student Model A (Handles Missing Values)] Input_Student_A[Input M (Data with Missing Values)] --> Student_A_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Prediction[Student A Prediction y_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Features[Student A Features F_A] end subgraph Knowledge_Distillation_A [Knowledge Distillation (Student A)] Teacher_Prediction -- Logits Distillation Loss (L_logits_A) --> Total_Loss_A Teacher_Features -- Feature Alignment Loss (L_feature_A) --> Total_Loss_A Ground_Truth_A[Ground Truth y_gt] -- Prediction Loss (L_pred_A)…arrow_forwardI'm reposting my question again please make sure to avoid any copy paste from the previous answer because those answer did not satisfy or responded to the need that's why I'm asking again The knowledge distillation part is not very clear in the diagram. Please create two new diagrams by separating the two student models: First Diagram (Student A - Missing Values): Clearly illustrate the student training process. Show how knowledge distillation happens between the teacher and Student A. Explain what the teacher teaches Student A (e.g., handling missing values) and how this teaching occurs (e.g., through logits, features, or attention). Second Diagram (Student B - Missing Labels): Similarly, detail the training process for Student B. Clarify how knowledge distillation works between the teacher and Student B. Specify what the teacher teaches Student B (e.g., dealing with missing labels) and how the knowledge is transferred. Since these are two distinct challenges…arrow_forward
- The knowledge distillation part is not very clear in the diagram. Please create two new diagrams by separating the two student models: First Diagram (Student A - Missing Values): Clearly illustrate the student training process. Show how knowledge distillation happens between the teacher and Student A. Explain what the teacher teaches Student A (e.g., handling missing values) and how this teaching occurs (e.g., through logits, features, or attention). Second Diagram (Student B - Missing Labels): Similarly, detail the training process for Student B. Clarify how knowledge distillation works between the teacher and Student B. Specify what the teacher teaches Student B (e.g., dealing with missing labels) and how the knowledge is transferred. Since these are two distinct challenges (missing values vs. missing labels), they should not be combined in the same diagram. Instead, create two separate diagrams for clarity. For reference, I will attach a second image…arrow_forwardNote : please avoid using AI answer the question by carefully reading it and provide a clear and concise solutionHere is a clear background and explanation of the full method, including what each part is doing and why. Background & Motivation Missing values: Some input features (sensor channels) are missing for some samples due to sensor failure or corruption. Missing labels: Not all samples have a ground-truth RUL value. For example, data collected during normal operation is often unlabeled. Most traditional deep learning models require complete data and full labels. But in our case, both are incomplete. If we try to train a model directly, it will either fail to learn properly or discard valuable data. What We Are Doing: Overview We solve this using a Teacher–Student knowledge distillation framework: We train a Teacher model on a clean and complete dataset where both inputs and labels are available. We then use that Teacher to teach two separate Student models: Student A learns…arrow_forwardHere is a clear background and explanation of the full method, including what each part is doing and why. Background & Motivation Missing values: Some input features (sensor channels) are missing for some samples due to sensor failure or corruption. Missing labels: Not all samples have a ground-truth RUL value. For example, data collected during normal operation is often unlabeled. Most traditional deep learning models require complete data and full labels. But in our case, both are incomplete. If we try to train a model directly, it will either fail to learn properly or discard valuable data. What We Are Doing: Overview We solve this using a Teacher–Student knowledge distillation framework: We train a Teacher model on a clean and complete dataset where both inputs and labels are available. We then use that Teacher to teach two separate Student models: Student A learns from incomplete input (some sensor values missing). Student B learns from incomplete labels (RUL labels missing…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Systems ArchitectureComputer ScienceISBN:9781305080195Author:Stephen D. BurdPublisher:Cengage Learning
Np Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I NtermedComputer ScienceISBN:9781337508841Author:CareyPublisher:Cengage
EBK JAVA PROGRAMMINGComputer ScienceISBN:9781337671385Author:FARRELLPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENTCOMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCEComputer ScienceISBN:9780357392676Author:FREUND, StevenPublisher:CENGAGE L
A+ Guide To It Technical SupportComputer ScienceISBN:9780357108291Author:ANDREWS, Jean.Publisher:Cengage,
Systems Architecture
Computer Science
ISBN:9781305080195
Author:Stephen D. Burd
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Np Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I Ntermed
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337508841
Author:Carey
Publisher:Cengage
EBK JAVA PROGRAMMING
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337671385
Author:FARRELL
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
COMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCE
Computer Science
ISBN:9780357392676
Author:FREUND, Steven
Publisher:CENGAGE L
A+ Guide To It Technical Support
Computer Science
ISBN:9780357108291
Author:ANDREWS, Jean.
Publisher:Cengage,