Concept explainers
Explanation of Solution
Effects of online ordering of merchandise on communities:
Online ordering of merchandise has quickly overtaken “hands on” shopping in traditional “brick and mortal” stores. It is very time consuming. It is easy to order online and goods are also shipped at no shipment charges. There are some other disadvantages, such as people become anti-social because they spend their time on internet and don’t go anywhere for shopping.
Effect on the shopping malls and small shops, such as bookstores and clothing stores:
The online ordering of merchandise has worst effect on shopping malls and small shops. Shopping malls become a center of entertainment and hang out. People rarely go to the malls for shopping. They buy anything on internet at the best prices. The scenario of small shops is really worse. It has become a show case in the market. Internet changes all the system and it will lead to unemployment.
Extent at which buying goods at the lowest possible price is good or bad:
The customers have to pay much more prices than the actual price because of the labor charges, GST and shipment charges. So, goods should be available at reasonable price for customers. Customers are buying goods at lowest possible price but they also want the quality of goods.
Moral obligation to pay more for an item in order to support a local business:
The international markets are ruling over the local businesses...
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 4 Solutions
Computer Science: An Overview (12th Edition)
- Internet has become a key instrument for expressing free speech. Many people and organizations use Facebook and Twitter to spread hate speech. Should online speech be unrestricted? How far should social media go to limit hate speech?arrow_forwardThe Internet has rapidly emerged as one of the most popular platforms for exercising one's right to free expression, and this trend is expected to continue. Facebook and Twitter are both being used by a large number of individuals and groups to disseminate hate speech. Given the nature of the medium, should the internet provide unrestricted free speech? Should there be limits placed on hate speech on social media?arrow_forwardWith the advent of the Internet, speech has become a fundamental tool for the practice of freedom of expression. Many individuals and even groups use social media like Facebook and Twitter to promote hate speech. Are there no limits to freedom of expression on the internet? Social networks should implement measures to limit hate speech.arrow_forward
- A luxury is something that is experienced as a pleasure rather than a necessity. Globally, most people consider food, shelter, and water necessities. Many Americans would undoubtedly add indoor plumbing and electricity to that list. Internet access is increasingly seen as a need rather than a luxury. But is it really a necessary for survival? So, what happens to folks who don't have access to or don't use the internet? Could the perception of Internet access as a need or a luxury affect the growth of e-commerce?arrow_forwardThe ubiquitous nature of mobile phones today brings tremendous convenience to our lives, but will misuse of new improvements to this technology result in the loss of that convenience? For instance, camera phones are now banned in many fitness centres, park restrooms, and other similar facilities because some people have used them inappropriately to take compromising photos, and mobile phones are banned in many classrooms because of the disruption of constant text messaging and the use of the phone by dishonest students to cheat on exams. Do you think these reactions to mobile phone misuse are justified? Is there another way to ensure the appropriate use of mobile phones without banning their use for all individuals? Should there be more stringent consequences for those who use technology for illegal or unethical purposes?arrow_forwardAs a result, using the Internet has become a crucial tool for exercising one's right to free expression. Hate speech is widely disseminated via social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, which are widely abused by a large number of individuals and even organizations. Should people's ability to express themselves freely on the internet be unrestricted? Where should the line be set when it comes to allowing nasty remarks on social networking sites?arrow_forward
- The use of the Internet as a vital instrument for exercising one's right to free speech has gained popularity swiftly. Many people, including organizations, exploit the influence that social media sites like Facebook and Twitter provide them to spread hate speech. Does it make sense for there to be no restrictions on freedom of speech on the internet? What steps should social media sites take to stop the spread of hate speech?arrow_forwardThe field of computer science - The Internet has had a profound effect on many facets of our everyday lives, including the ways in which we learn and relax. There are some drawbacks to using the Internet despite its numerous benefits. What are the most significant benefits and cons of using the Internet?arrow_forwardThe Internet has become an increasingly important medium via which individuals may exercise their right to free speech. Facebook and Twitter are being used by a lot of different people and organisations to spread anti-Semitic information. Is free expression on the internet a right or a privilege? How far should social media companies go to stop the spread of information that promotes hatred?arrow_forward
- Users invest a great deal of time into widely used social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Check out whether consumers prefer a digital social network to a more conventional one. Is it possible that spending too much time on social networking sites online might negatively impact one's mental health? When is it reasonable to worry that anything we do online could become addictive? Look for an article from a recent issue of a newspaper or magazine that features a person who has gotten "dependent" on social networking sites or other forms of online activity.arrow_forwardThe Internet has developed into a crucial medium for the exercise of one's right to freedom of expression. Facebook and Twitter are both being used by a large number of individuals and groups to disseminate hate speech. Should there be no limits placed on what people may say online? Where should the line be drawn when it comes to limiting hate speech on social media?arrow_forwardThe Internet has swiftly gained notoriety as a vital instrument for expressing one's right to freedom of speech, and it is becoming more popular. Using the power granted them by social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter to broadcast hate speech, many individuals and even organizations have taken advantage of the opportunity. Is it reasonable for freedom of speech to be unrestrained on the internet, given the nature of the medium? Are there any specific actions that social media sites should take in order to prevent hate speech from spreading?arrow_forward
- Database System ConceptsComputer ScienceISBN:9780078022159Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. SudarshanPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationStarting Out with Python (4th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780134444321Author:Tony GaddisPublisher:PEARSONDigital Fundamentals (11th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780132737968Author:Thomas L. FloydPublisher:PEARSON
- C How to Program (8th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780133976892Author:Paul J. Deitel, Harvey DeitelPublisher:PEARSONDatabase Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781337627900Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven MorrisPublisher:Cengage LearningProgrammable Logic ControllersComputer ScienceISBN:9780073373843Author:Frank D. PetruzellaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education