Economics For Today
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337613040
Author: Tucker
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 18SQ
To determine
The impact of pollution tax on the coal-fired power.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
The table below shows the demand for pollution permits to emit hydrocarbons in a particular industrial park. Each permit allows the owner to release one tonne of pollutants into the atmosphere.
Price perPollution Permit
Quantity of Permits
$4,500
75
4,000
150
3,500
225
3,000
300
2,500
375
2,000
450
1,500
525
a. If no fee for a pollution permit were charged, how many tonnes of pollutants would be discharged into the atmosphere, assuming a straight-line demand curve? Quantity: tonnesb. Suppose government were to set a fee of $3,500 per pollution permit. How many tonnes of pollutants would now be dumped? What is the total revenue received by government? Quantity: tonnes
Total revenue: $ c. Suppose that a new technology allows for a significant reduction in hydrocarbons at a relatively low cost so that the demand for pollution permits in the industrial park drops by 150 tonnes. Assuming that government holds the permit fee at $3,500, how many tonnes of…
What happens in the market for a good that pollutes the air when it is manufactured if government decides to tax consumers when the product is purchased? Will this reduce the amount of air pollution?
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is:
MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its
marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. The adoption costs
for the new technology are $6. If the government raises the tax on emissions
from $1 to $4, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $.
Select one:
a. $7.50.
O b. $12.
C. $3.
O d. $4.5.
Chapter 4 Solutions
Economics For Today
Ch. 4.2 - Prob. 1YTECh. 4.2 - Prob. 2YTECh. 4.2 - Prob. 3YTECh. 4.2 - Prob. 4YTECh. 4.3 - Prob. 1YTECh. 4.3 - Prob. 2YTECh. 4 - Prob. 1SQPCh. 4 - Prob. 2SQPCh. 4 - Prob. 3SQPCh. 4 - Prob. 4SQP
Ch. 4 - Prob. 5SQPCh. 4 - Prob. 6SQPCh. 4 - Prob. 7SQPCh. 4 - Prob. 8SQPCh. 4 - Prob. 9SQPCh. 4 - Prob. 10SQPCh. 4 - Prob. 1SQCh. 4 - Prob. 2SQCh. 4 - Prob. 3SQCh. 4 - Prob. 4SQCh. 4 - Prob. 5SQCh. 4 - Prob. 6SQCh. 4 - Prob. 7SQCh. 4 - Prob. 8SQCh. 4 - Prob. 9SQCh. 4 - Prob. 10SQCh. 4 - Prob. 11SQCh. 4 - Prob. 12SQCh. 4 - Prob. 13SQCh. 4 - Prob. 14SQCh. 4 - Prob. 15SQCh. 4 - Prob. 16SQCh. 4 - Prob. 17SQCh. 4 - Prob. 18SQCh. 4 - Prob. 19SQCh. 4 - Prob. 20SQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The table below shows the demand for pollution permits to emit hydrocarbons in a particular industrial park. Each permit allows the owner to release one tonne of pollutants into the atmosphere. Price per Pollution Permit Quantity of Permits $4,500 100 4,000 200 3,500 300 3,000 400 2,500 500 2,000 600 1,500 700 were charged, how many tonnes of pollutants would be discharged into the atmosphere, assuming a straight-line a. If fee for a pollution perm demand curve? Quantity: tonnes b. Suppose government were to set a fee of $2,500 per pollution permit. How many tonnes of pollutants would now be dumped? What is the total revenue received by government? Quantity: tonnes Total revenue: $ c. Suppose that a new technology allows for a significant reduction in hydrocarbons at a relatively low cost so that the demand for pollution permits in the industrial park drops by 200 tonnes. Assuming that government holds the permit fee at $2,500, how many tonnes of pollutants would now be dumped? What…arrow_forwardFirm A currently dumps 161 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 127 tons of chemicals into the local river. The government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives Firm A 13 pollution permits and gives Firm B 43 pollution permits. The abatement costs of one ton of pollution is $175 for Firm A and $60 for Firm B. What would be the total cost of reducing pollution, if the firms are allowed to trade permits between each other?arrow_forwardThere are three industrial firms in the county. -Firm A's initial pollution level is 50 units. Its cost of reducing pollution by 1 unit is $30. -Firm B's initial pollution level is 40 units. Its cost of reducing pollution by 1 unit is $20.-Firm C's initial pollution level is 30 units. Its cost of reducing pollution by 1 unit is $40.The government wants to reduce pollution to 90 units so it gives each firm 30 tradable pollution permits.(i) Who sells permits? (ii) How many do they sell? (iii) Who buys permits? (iv) How many do they buy?arrow_forward
- What are pollution havens? How are they created or why do they exist? Why do economists think they may change over time and develop policies to reduce pollution?arrow_forwardWhich of the following policies could help the government achieve the efficient outcome? Check all that apply. Introduce emission taxes Offer a subsidy to consumers equal to the vertical distance between the marginal private benefit curve and the marginal social benefit curve Implement tradable pollution permits Offer a subsidy equal to the price at the efficient outcome Offer a subsidy to producers equal to the vertical distance between the marginal private benefit curve and marginal social benefit curvearrow_forwardParks confer many external benefits on society: open space, trees that reduce pollution, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of parks is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for parks (their private value), the supply of parks (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of parks, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity.arrow_forward
- Firm A currently dumps 243 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 126 tons of chemicals into the local river. The government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives Firm A 61 pollution permits and gives Firm B 65 pollution permits. The abatement costs of one ton of pollution is $113 for Firm A and $165 for Firm B. What would be the total cost of reducing pollution, if the government does NOT allow the firm to trade the permits between each other?arrow_forwardThere are three identical firms in Happy Valley. Firms Initial Pollution Level Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 unit A 30 units $20 B 40 units $30 C 20 units $10 The government wants to reduce total pollution to 60 units, so it gives each firm 20 tradable permits. Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so? What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation? How much larger would the cost of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?arrow_forwardFirm A currently dumps 223 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 192 tons of chemicals into the local river. The government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives each firm 10 pollution permits. The abatement costs of one ton of pollution is $173 for Firm A and $76 for Firm B. What would be the total cost of reducing pollution, if the firms are allowed to trade permits between each other?arrow_forward
- A) Figure 10-1 (above)- For the described negative externality, what is the market Price/Quantity combination without any efforts to correct the market? B) Figure 10-1 (above)- For the described negative externality, what will happen to the equilibrium price and quantity if the government imposes a tax to remedy the negative externality (don't use exact numbers)? C) For a negative externality, briefly explain why and how the governmentmay get involved in the market. In your response, provide an example (type of product or service).arrow_forwardImagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 24 – 2E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 12 – E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $2. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $2 to $4, the firm's total costs increase by $_____. Select one: a. $19. b. $15. c. $16. d. $21. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardExplain the difference between a positive externality and a negative externality. Can both types of externalities result in market failure? Why or why not?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning