Concept explainers
Explain why it only appears that we are at the center of expansion of the universe and why an observer in another galaxy would see the same relative motion of all but the closest galaxies away from her.
The appearance of our galaxy at the center of the expansion of the universe and an observer would see the same relative motion from another galaxy.
Explanation of Solution
Introduction:
Universe is expanding from everywhere and it has no center of expansion. Materials expand from a center in a conventional explosion while Big Bang was an ordinary explosion as there was no time and space before it. Since, the entire universe is expanding not from a center point.
According to Hubble's law, the expansion of the universe is uniformly at all places and the galaxies which were farther away, those were faster receding that's why it appears that we are at the center of the expansion.
Consider an example of a balloon analogy to explain the expansion of the universe. Consider some dots on the surface of the balloon. When air is blown inside it, the balloon expands in all direction and the distance between the dots increases from the point under consideration as a center. Similarly, the universe is expanding uniformly as there is no center of expansion.
From the above, it is clear that an observer can see themselves as stationary at any point on the universe and the other objects appears moving away in space uniformly in all the directions that's why an observer would see the same relative motion from another galaxy.
Conclusion:
Therefore, the universe is expanding uniformly in all the directions as there is no center of expansion that's why an observer would see the same relative motion from another galaxy.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 34 Solutions
College Physics
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Microbiology with Diseases by Body System (5th Edition)
Applications and Investigations in Earth Science (9th Edition)
Human Anatomy & Physiology (2nd Edition)
Microbiology: An Introduction
Campbell Essential Biology with Physiology (5th Edition)
Fundamentals of Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
- Some theorists expected that observations would show that the density of matter in the universe is just equal to the critical density. Do the current observations support this hypothesis?arrow_forwardWhy cant an open universe have a center? How can a closed universe not have a center?arrow_forwardWhat is the most useful probe of the early evolution of the universe: a giant elliptical galaxy or an irregular galaxy such as the Large Magellanic Cloud? Why?arrow_forward
- The classical Doppler shift for light. A light source recedes from an observer with a speed v that is small compared with c. (a) Show that in this case, Equation 1.15 reduces to ffvc (b) Also show that in this case vc (Hint: Differentiate f = c to show that / = f/f) (c) Spectroscopic measurements of an absorption line normally found at = 397 nm reveal a redshift of 20 nm for light coming from a galaxy in Ursa Major. What is the recessional speed of this galaxy?arrow_forwardIf all distant galaxies are expanding away from us, does this mean we’re at the center of the universe?arrow_forwardWhat do we now understand to be the primary difference between normal galaxies and active galaxies?arrow_forward
- Galaxies are found in the “walls” of huge voids; very few galaxies are found in the voids themselves. The text says that the structure of filaments and voids has been present in the universe since shortly after the expansion began 13.8 billion years ago. In science, we always have to check to see whether some conclusion is contradicted by any other information we have. In this case, we can ask whether the voids would have filled up with galaxies in roughly 14 billion years. Observations show that in addition to the motion associated with the expansion of the universe, the galaxies in the walls of the voids are moving in random directions at typical speeds of 300 km/s. At least some of them will be moving into the voids. How far into the void will a galaxy move in 14 billion years? Is it a reasonable hypothesis that the voids have existed for 14 billion years?arrow_forwardSuppose you were Hubble and Humason, working on the distances and Doppler shifts of the galaxies. What sorts of things would you have to do to convince yourself (and others) that the relationship you were seeing between the two quantities was a real feature of the behavior of the universe? (For example, would data from two galaxies be enough to demonstrate Hubble’s law? Would data from just the nearest galaxies-in what astronomers call “the Local Group”-suffice?)arrow_forwardAstronomers have been making maps by observing a slice of the universe and seeing where the galaxies lie within that slice. If the universe is isotropic and homogeneous, why do they need more than one slice? Suppose they now want to make each slice extend farther into the universe. What do they need to do?arrow_forward
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781938168000Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger HinrichsPublisher:OpenStax CollegeAstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStaxFoundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Stars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399944Author:Michael A. SeedsPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningModern PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781111794378Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. MoyerPublisher:Cengage Learning