Why was the Michelson-Morley experiment a more sensitive test of motion through the ether than independent measurements of the
The reason why the Michelson-Morley experiment is said to be a more sensitive test of motion through ether than independent measurements of speed of light in two perpendicular directions.
Answer to Problem 1FTD
The interference pattern in Michelson-Morley experiment denotes the existence of ether; it can be treated as a sensitive test of motion through ether than independent measurements of speed of light in two perpendicular directions.
Explanation of Solution
Michelson-Morley experiment was intended to check whether the existence of relative motion between Earth and ether. If it exists, speed of light in different direction should be different. From the experiment, it is proved that there is no relative motion between earth and ether. So, the speed of light is same in all directions. In other words, it proves the absence of ether.
Michelson-Morley experiment obtained this result from the interference pattern formed by two perpendicular light beams. If there is a phase shift between the beams, implies the relative velocity between the earth and ether. In the experiment, the phase shift was negligibly small, means no relative motion exists between the earth and ether. The interference pattern in Michelson-Morley experiment has strong correlation with motion through ether. This is why the Michelson-Morley experiment is said to be a sensitive test of motion through ether than independent measurements of speed of light in two perpendicular directions.
Conclusion: Therefore, the interference pattern in Michelson-Morley experiment denotes the existence of ether; it can be treated as a sensitive test of motion through ether than independent measurements of speed of light in two perpendicular directions.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 33 Solutions
Essential University Physics (3rd Edition)
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Campbell Biology (11th Edition)
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (3rd Edition)
Genetic Analysis: An Integrated Approach (3rd Edition)
Campbell Essential Biology with Physiology (5th Edition)
Chemistry: An Introduction to General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry (13th Edition)
Campbell Essential Biology (7th Edition)
- Consider the situation in the figure below; a neutral conducting ball hangs from the ceiling by an insulating string, and a charged insulating rod is going to be placed nearby. A. First, if the rod was not there, what statement best describes the charge distribution of the ball? 1) Since it is a conductor, all the charges are on the outside of the ball. 2) The ball is neutral, so it has no positive or negative charges anywhere. 3) The positive and negative charges are separated from each other, but we don't know what direction the ball is polarized. 4) The positive and negative charges are evenly distributed everywhere in the ball. B. Now, when the rod is moved close to the ball, what happens to the charges on the ball? 1) There is a separation of charges in the ball; the side closer to the rod becomes positively charged, and the opposite side becomes negatively charged. 2) Negative charge is drawn from the ground (via the string), so the ball acquires a net negative charge. 3)…arrow_forwardanswer question 5-9arrow_forwardAMPS VOLTS OHMS 5) 50 A 110 V 6) .08 A 39 V 7) 0.5 A 60 8) 2.5 A 110 Varrow_forward
- The drawing shows an edge-on view of two planar surfaces that intersect and are mutually perpendicular. Surface (1) has an area of 1.90 m², while surface (2) has an area of 3.90 m². The electric field in the drawing is uniform and has a magnitude of 215 N/C. Find the magnitude of the electric flux through surface (1 and 2 combined) if the angle 8 made between the electric field with surface (2) is 30.0°. Solve in Nm²/C 1 Ө Surface 2 Surface 1arrow_forwardPROBLEM 5 What is the magnitude and direction of the resultant force acting on the connection support shown here? F₁ = 700 lbs F2 = 250 lbs 70° 60° F3 = 700 lbs 45° F4 = 300 lbs 40° Fs = 800 lbs 18° Free Body Diagram F₁ = 700 lbs 70° 250 lbs 60° F3= = 700 lbs 45° F₁ = 300 lbs 40° = Fs 800 lbs 18°arrow_forwardPROBLEM 3 Cables A and B are Supporting a 185-lb wooden crate. What is the magnitude of the tension force in each cable? A 20° 35° 185 lbsarrow_forward
- The determined Wile E. Coyote is out once more to try to capture the elusive Road Runner of Loony Tunes fame. The coyote is strapped to a rocket, which provide a constant horizontal acceleration of 15.0 m/s2. The coyote starts off at rest 79.2 m from the edge of a cliff at the instant the roadrunner zips by in the direction of the cliff. If the roadrunner moves with constant speed, find the minimum velocity the roadrunner must have to reach the cliff before the coyote. (proper sig fig in answer)arrow_forwardPROBLEM 4 What is the resultant of the force system acting on the connection shown? 25 F₁ = 80 lbs IK 65° F2 = 60 lbsarrow_forwardThree point-like charges in the attached image are placed at the corners of an equilateral triangle as shown in the figure. Each side of the triangle has a length of 38.0 cm, and the point (C) is located half way between q1 and q3 along the side. Find the magnitude of the electric field at point (C). Let q1 = −2.80 µC, q2 = −3.40 µC, and q3 = −4.50 µC. Thank you.arrow_forward
- Modern PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781111794378Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. MoyerPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics Volume 3PhysicsISBN:9781938168185Author:William Moebs, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningPhysics for Scientists and Engineers, Technology ...PhysicsISBN:9781305116399Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningClassical Dynamics of Particles and SystemsPhysicsISBN:9780534408961Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. MarionPublisher:Cengage Learning