Concept explainers
Case summary:
Person K is the production manager for Company A, that manufactures office equipment. He read an article in the newspaper “stressed the benefit of participative management” and believed that those benefits would be recognised in his department.
The first decision is about vacation schedules. On this decision, the group changed into deadlocked and he would have to solve the disputes by himself. The second decision is about production standards. New machineries and equipment’s helps the workers to yield more production without working harder. Thus the savings can be used to pay new machineries and equipment.
The workers recommended the management to keep the same production standards. The spokesperson explained that their basic salary pay had not saved up with the inflation rates and the management add incentives to their basic pay to its previous level.
To analyse: Situation as per Person H and B model and as per person V and J model and suggestions of these models about the style of leadership.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 3 Solutions
Bundle: The Leadership Experience, Loose-Leaf Version, 7th + MindTap Management, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card
- GJ Company was founded by two friends, Gerry and James. It engages in administrative and sales functions of the business while Gerry the repair of automobiles. James handled the managed the shop. There are five mechanics in the shop who worked well under Gerry's supervision. Gerry encouraged a friendly atmosphere, allowing men to participate in deciding who would do a specific task on a given day. Everyone was satisfied because each was doing what he wanted them to do. Work was well done and always on schedule. However, a time came when there were a lot of job orders that could not be finished on time. James confronted Gerry and blamed the way he managed the five mechanics for the delays. He argued that Gerry should be more organized and efficient in the work processes. Gerry was also told to be more strict and less friendly to the mechanics. Gerry did not agree with James and decided to leave the partnership. James got a new manager, Carlo, to replace Gerry. Carlo set up work…arrow_forward1 What is your opinion? Two safety and health students are debating the issue of corporate responsibility. Ken thinks that industry has clearly demonstrated its unwillingness over the years to provide a safe and healthy work environment for employees. He offers such examples as the Gauley Bridge disaster and the Bhopal gas tragedy as evidence. Janny agrees that industry indeed has a checkered past on safety and health, but she thinks employers have learned that their workforce is a valuable asset that should be protected. Tom's response is, "Take away federal and state mandates, and industry would return to its old ways in less that a year," Join this debate. What is your opinion? 2 What is your opinion? Mack Jones has been a safety engineer at Zumwalt Processing Company for almost 25 years. His son David is a recent college graduate who has been the assistant safety director at another company for just six months. Over supper last night, they had a discussion about work injuries.…arrow_forwardJohn is a loyal employee and has been working at the same firm for many years, since the current manager was a child but a year ago John’s son and wife died in an accident, which led to John being depressed. He turns up for work late, sometimes drunk, and often absent. He has been repeatedly warned but his behavior hasn’t change. The manager decides to keep him on the job; did he do the right thing? JUSTIFY THEI CASE WITH REASON BASED ON ETHCAL THOERIES WHTHER MANAGER IS RIGHT OR WRONG ACCORDING TO – 2 MARKS (EACH 1 MARKS)arrow_forward
- Management John is the CEO of a large corporation that has been facing financial difficulties. In order to turn the company around, John makes the decision to cut costs by laying off a significant number of employees. However, some of these employees have been with the company for many years and are nearing retirement age. They are devastated by the news and feel that they have been treated unfairly. John is aware of the negative impact that the layoffs will have on the employees and their families. He is also aware of the potential negative publicity that the layoffs could generate for the company. However, he believes that the decision is necessary in order to ensure the long-term viability of the company. As the CEO, John has a responsibility to act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. However, he also has a responsibility to act ethically and with compassion towards the employees who will be affected by the layoffs. 1.What ethical considerations should John…arrow_forwardEmployees in Best plc are heavily unionised. Best plc has recently announced plans to restructure its business, leading to the loss of around twenty percent of its workforce. According to Mendelow’s matrix, what approach should Best plc adopt to managing its employees? Select one: a. Minimal effort b. Key players c. Keep informed d. Keep satisfiedarrow_forwardAn organization has a staffing strategy in which it hires 10% more employees than it needs in any job category to ensure its hiring needs are met. Leaders in the organization reason that some of the new hires will renege on the accepted offer and that the organization can renege on some of its offers, if needed, in order to end up with the right number of new hires. Evaluate this strategy from an ethical perspective. Explain.arrow_forward
- CHOICE 1: Mark and Henry are colleagues working under the same section in a business company. Mark has served the company for more than twenty years, starting from the lowest position and working his way up steadily. He is very hard working and has a traditional mindset that believes hard work will always pay off one day. Henry, on the other hand, is a much younger employee who just joined the company a few weeks ago. Despite his inexperience, Henry is very talented. He entered the company as a fresh university graduate in business studies and was promoted to the same position as Mark within the few weeks since his entry into the company. Of course, when Mark heard about Henry's promotion, he was not happy to see someone so young and inexperienced to be promoted so quickly, whereas it took years for him to achieve his current position. Mark is still a bachelor, mainly because he is so hard working he has no time for a romantic relationship. He is always serious in his work, so his…arrow_forwardThe Civil Service Board in a midsize city in Indiana decided that a written exam should be given to all candidates for promotion to supervisor. A written test would assess mental skills and would open access to all personnel who wanted to apply for the position. The board believed a written exam for promotion would be completely fair and objective because it eliminated subjective judgements and personal favoritism regarding a candidate’s qualification. Maxine Othman, a manager of social service agency, loved to see her employees learn and grow to their full potential. When a rare opening for a supervising clerk occurred, Maxine quickly decided to give Sheryl Hines a shot at the job. Sheryl had been with the agency for seventeen years and had shown herself to be a true leader. Sheryl worked hard at becoming a good supervisor, just as she had always worked hard at being a top-notch clerk. She paid attention to the human aspects of employee problems and introduced modern management…arrow_forwardWhat are the four standards of scientists that define their work ethic? Explain each. Scientists are seen as submitting to four standards that define their work ethic. First, they adhere to universalism- the belief that there is only one truth and that there is only one way to establish it, the scientific method. Second, they identify themselves as members of a community of scientists with a common goal and consciousness. This is usually operationalized through their membership in professional, scientific organizations. Third, they generally possess a strong sense of skepticism. They suspend opinion and will only express one when all data are collected and analyzed through a neutral and objective process under the standards of logic and rationality. Finally, they are generally disinterested and detached in that they uphold the virtue of neutrality and objectiveness in their research.Further explain each ethic please.arrow_forward
- Hubert Johnson is a department head. He has been with the company for 30 years and knows his way around quite well. He has two employees, Harriet Green and Neil White. Harriet has been with the company for 15 years and Neil has been with the company for six years. Harriet has always been cooperative, loyal, dependable, but not an especially good supervisor. Recently Hubert has noticed that Harriet has begun to “slip” in the performance of some of her duties. Neil, on the other hand is a very ambitious, energetic, and dependable supervisor who grasps problems quickly and easily. Hubert has to complete performance appraisals on both individuals annually.Ten months ago he did his appraising with a great deal of displeasure because he hated to face the unpleasantness of a negative performance appraisal review. As a result, he rated both the employees about the same. When a discussion about the ratings was conducted, both supervisors appeared to be satisfied with the rating they had…arrow_forwardHubert Johnson is a department head. He has been with the company for 30 years and knows his way around quite well. He has two employees, Harriet Green and Neil White. Harriet has been with the company for 15 years and Neil has been with the company for six years. Harriet has always been cooperative, loyal, dependable, but not an especially good supervisor. Recently Hubert has noticed that Harriet has begun to “slip” in the performance of some of her duties. Neil, on the other hand is a very ambitious, energetic, and dependable supervisor who grasps problems quickly and easily. Hubert has to complete performance appraisals on both individuals annually.Ten months ago he did his appraising with a great deal of displeasure because he hated to face the unpleasantness of a negative performance appraisal review. As a result, he rated both the employees about the same. When a discussion about the ratings was conducted, both supervisors appeared to be satisfied with the rating they had…arrow_forwardOnce a month, Tom meets with a group of employees from various departments at his firm. They gather for breakfast in one of the firm's conference rooms to discuss their individual career goals. Which of the following terms most likely describes Tom's group? A) labor union B) career success team C) corporate fraternity D) career anchor team E) management planning grouparrow_forward
- Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)ManagementISBN:9781305502215Author:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy MarcicPublisher:Cengage Learning