The definition of resistivity ( ρ = E/J ) implies that an electric field exists inside a conductor. Yet we saw in Chapter 21 that there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor. Is there a contradiction here? Explain.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 25, Problem 25.1DQ

The definition of resistivity (ρ = E/J) implies that an electric field exists inside a conductor. Yet we saw in Chapter 21 that there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor. Is there a contradiction here? Explain.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

if there is any contradiction to the statement, there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Explanation of Solution

There is no contradiction to the statement, since that was a situation dealing with electrostatics.

Consider the formula for the resistivity (ρ).

ρ=EJ (I)

E is the electric field,
J is current density.

From equation (I), we have E, which refers to the electric field applied in a closed circuit. This forms a major difference from the electrostatics situation.

The main condition with respect to electrostatics was that the charges involved in the situation were static. That is they were not moving charges. This is because they do not experience any force while in their equilibrium position. In this situation, there is no presence of electric field.

In the given situation of the electric field, we have moving charges as it is a closed circuit with an applied field. There is no such equilibrium as in the case of electrostatics.

Conclusion:

Therefore, there is any contradiction to the statement there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

01:35

Students have asked these similar questions

Good conductors of electricity are often good conductors of heat. Why might this be? We are currently learning about Electric Current in my physics 2 class to give some context.

Technician A says that a conductor has 1 to 3 electrons orbiting in its outer valance ring. Technician B says that an insulator has 4 electrons orbiting in its outer valance ring. Who is correct? Or both? Technician A says that a loose or corroded ground could cause a dimly lit bulb. Technician B says that a loose or corroded ground could cause a blown fuse.

Measuring Blood Flow. Blood contains positive and negative ions and thus is a conductor. A blood vessel, therefore, can be viewed as an electrical wire. We can even picture the flowing blood as a series of parallel conducting slabs whose thickness is the diameter 5.00 mm of the vessel moving with speed. (See in the following figure.( Figure 1)) Figure X XBX X XX X X X X d 1 of 1 V If you expect that the blood will be flowing at 15.3 cm/s for a vessel 5.00 mm in diameter, what strength of magnetic field will you need to produce a potential difference of 1.00 mV ? Express your answer with the appropriate units. B = Submit Part C 0 R = μA Submit Value X Incorrect; Try Again; 5 attempts remaining T Previous Answers Request Answer = VE ΑΣΦ Determine the volume rate of flow (R). (Note: Although the method developed here is useful in measuring the rate of blood flow in a vessel, it is limited to use in surgery because measurement of the potential & must be made directly across the vessel.)…

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 25, Problem 25.1DQ

The definition of resistivity (ρ = E/J) implies that an electric field exists inside a conductor. Yet we saw in Chapter 21 that there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor. Is there a contradiction here? Explain.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

if there is any contradiction to the statement, there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Explanation of Solution

There is no contradiction to the statement, since that was a situation dealing with electrostatics.

Consider the formula for the resistivity (ρ).

ρ=EJ (I)

E is the electric field,
J is current density.

From equation (I), we have E, which refers to the electric field applied in a closed circuit. This forms a major difference from the electrostatics situation.

The main condition with respect to electrostatics was that the charges involved in the situation were static. That is they were not moving charges. This is because they do not experience any force while in their equilibrium position. In this situation, there is no presence of electric field.

In the given situation of the electric field, we have moving charges as it is a closed circuit with an applied field. There is no such equilibrium as in the case of electrostatics.

Conclusion:

Therefore, there is any contradiction to the statement there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

01:35

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 25, Problem 25.1DQ

The definition of resistivity (ρ = E/J) implies that an electric field exists inside a conductor. Yet we saw in Chapter 21 that there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor. Is there a contradiction here? Explain.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

if there is any contradiction to the statement, there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Explanation of Solution

There is no contradiction to the statement, since that was a situation dealing with electrostatics.

Consider the formula for the resistivity (ρ).

ρ=EJ (I)

E is the electric field,
J is current density.

From equation (I), we have E, which refers to the electric field applied in a closed circuit. This forms a major difference from the electrostatics situation.

The main condition with respect to electrostatics was that the charges involved in the situation were static. That is they were not moving charges. This is because they do not experience any force while in their equilibrium position. In this situation, there is no presence of electric field.

In the given situation of the electric field, we have moving charges as it is a closed circuit with an applied field. There is no such equilibrium as in the case of electrostatics.

Conclusion:

Therefore, there is any contradiction to the statement there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

01:35

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 25, Problem 25.1DQ

The definition of resistivity (ρ = E/J) implies that an electric field exists inside a conductor. Yet we saw in Chapter 21 that there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor. Is there a contradiction here? Explain.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

if there is any contradiction to the statement, there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Explanation of Solution

There is no contradiction to the statement, since that was a situation dealing with electrostatics.

Consider the formula for the resistivity (ρ).

ρ=EJ (I)

E is the electric field,
J is current density.

From equation (I), we have E, which refers to the electric field applied in a closed circuit. This forms a major difference from the electrostatics situation.

The main condition with respect to electrostatics was that the charges involved in the situation were static. That is they were not moving charges. This is because they do not experience any force while in their equilibrium position. In this situation, there is no presence of electric field.

In the given situation of the electric field, we have moving charges as it is a closed circuit with an applied field. There is no such equilibrium as in the case of electrostatics.

Conclusion:

Therefore, there is any contradiction to the statement there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

01:35

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

if there is any contradiction to the statement, there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Explanation of Solution

There is no contradiction to the statement, since that was a situation dealing with electrostatics.

Consider the formula for the resistivity (ρ).

ρ=EJ (I)

E is the electric field,
J is current density.

From equation (I), we have E, which refers to the electric field applied in a closed circuit. This forms a major difference from the electrostatics situation.

The main condition with respect to electrostatics was that the charges involved in the situation were static. That is they were not moving charges. This is because they do not experience any force while in their equilibrium position. In this situation, there is no presence of electric field.

In the given situation of the electric field, we have moving charges as it is a closed circuit with an applied field. There is no such equilibrium as in the case of electrostatics.

Conclusion:

Therefore, there is any contradiction to the statement there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

if there is any contradiction to the statement, there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Explanation of Solution

There is no contradiction to the statement, since that was a situation dealing with electrostatics.

Consider the formula for the resistivity (ρ).

ρ=EJ (I)

E is the electric field,
J is current density.

From equation (I), we have E, which refers to the electric field applied in a closed circuit. This forms a major difference from the electrostatics situation.

The main condition with respect to electrostatics was that the charges involved in the situation were static. That is they were not moving charges. This is because they do not experience any force while in their equilibrium position. In this situation, there is no presence of electric field.

In the given situation of the electric field, we have moving charges as it is a closed circuit with an applied field. There is no such equilibrium as in the case of electrostatics.

Conclusion:

Therefore, there is any contradiction to the statement there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

To determine

if there is any contradiction to the statement, there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

There is no contradiction to the statement, since that was a situation dealing with electrostatics.

Consider the formula for the resistivity (ρ).

ρ=EJ (I)

E is the electric field,
J is current density.

From equation (I), we have E, which refers to the electric field applied in a closed circuit. This forms a major difference from the electrostatics situation.

The main condition with respect to electrostatics was that the charges involved in the situation were static. That is they were not moving charges. This is because they do not experience any force while in their equilibrium position. In this situation, there is no presence of electric field.

In the given situation of the electric field, we have moving charges as it is a closed circuit with an applied field. There is no such equilibrium as in the case of electrostatics.

Conclusion:

Therefore, there is any contradiction to the statement there can be no electrostatic electric field inside a conductor.