Chemistry: Atoms First
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780073511184
Author: Julia Burdge, Jason Overby Professor
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20.3, Problem 3PPC
Interpretation Introduction
Interpretation:
The reason for not using carbon dating method to date objects that are only a few years old should be explained.
Concept introduction:
- Spontaneous disintegration: radioactive material contain nuclides which under goes spontaneous disintegration.
- This process is the accompanied by the emission of one or more than one types of ionizing radiation like alpha ,beta, neutron, particles and gamma rays are disintegrate
- Radio active life-it refers to the amount of time taken by completion of half of its original isotope to decay. The rate of decay is a fixed rate called half-life.
- Half-life used in carbon dating-technique for the age calculation of dead wood fossil, monument old tree etc.
- The half-life period is determined by considering carbon dating technique.
- Carbon dating uses the half-life of carbon-14 to find the approximate age of an object. Its may be 40.000 year old or younger.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Which carbocation is more stable?
Are the products of the given reaction correct? Why or why not?
The question below asks why the products shown are NOT the correct products. I asked this already, and the person explained why those are the correct products, as opposed to what we would think should be the correct products. That's the opposite of what the question was asking. Why are they not the correct products? A reaction mechanism for how we arrive at the correct products is requested ("using key intermediates"). In other words, why is HCl added to the terminal alkene rather than the internal alkene?
Chapter 20 Solutions
Chemistry: Atoms First
Ch. 20.1 - Prob. 20.1WECh. 20.1 - Prob. 1PPACh. 20.1 - Prob. 1PPBCh. 20.1 - Prob. 1PPCCh. 20.1 - Prob. 20.1.1SRCh. 20.1 - Prob. 20.1.2SRCh. 20.2 - Prob. 20.2WECh. 20.2 - Prob. 2PPACh. 20.2 - Prob. 2PPBCh. 20.2 - Prob. 2PPC
Ch. 20.2 - Prob. 20.2.1SRCh. 20.2 - Prob. 20.2.2SRCh. 20.2 - Prob. 20.2.3SRCh. 20.2 - Prob. 20.2.4SRCh. 20.3 - Prob. 20.3WECh. 20.3 - Prob. 3PPACh. 20.3 - Prob. 3PPBCh. 20.3 - Prob. 3PPCCh. 20.3 - Prob. 20.4WECh. 20.3 - Prob. 4PPACh. 20.3 - Prob. 4PPBCh. 20.3 - Prob. 4PPCCh. 20.3 - Prob. 20.3.1SRCh. 20.3 - Prob. 20.3.2SRCh. 20.3 - Prob. 20.3.3SRCh. 20.4 - Prob. 20.5WECh. 20.4 - Prob. 5PPACh. 20.4 - Prob. 5PPBCh. 20.4 - Prob. 5PPCCh. 20.4 - Prob. 20.4.1SRCh. 20.4 - Prob. 20.4.2SRCh. 20 - Prob. 20.1QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.2QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.3QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.4QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.5QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.6QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.7QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.8QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.9QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.10QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.11QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.12QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.13QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.14QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.15QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.16QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.17QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.18QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.19QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.20QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.21QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.22QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.23QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.24QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.25QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.26QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.27QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.28QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.29QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.30QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.31QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.32QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.33QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.34QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.35QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.36QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.37QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.38QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.39QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.1VCCh. 20 - Prob. 20.2VCCh. 20 - Prob. 20.3VCCh. 20 - Prob. 20.4VCCh. 20 - Prob. 20.40QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.41QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.42QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.43QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.44QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.45QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.46QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.47QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.48QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.49QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.50QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.51QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.52QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.53QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.54QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.55QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.56QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.57QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.58QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.59QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.60QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.61QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.62QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.63QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.64QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.65QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.66QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.67QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.68QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.69QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.70QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.71QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.72QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.73QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.74QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.75QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.76QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.77QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.78QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.79QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.80QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.81QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.82QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.83QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.84QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.85QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.86QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.87QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.88QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.89QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.90QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.91QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.92QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.93QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.94QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.95QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.96QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.97QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.98QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.99QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.100QPCh. 20 - Prob. 20.101QP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- My question is whether HI adds to both double bonds, and if it doesn't, why not?arrow_forwardStrain Energy for Alkanes Interaction / Compound kJ/mol kcal/mol H: H eclipsing 4.0 1.0 H: CH3 eclipsing 5.8 1.4 CH3 CH3 eclipsing 11.0 2.6 gauche butane 3.8 0.9 cyclopropane 115 27.5 cyclobutane 110 26.3 cyclopentane 26.0 6.2 cycloheptane 26.2 6.3 cyclooctane 40.5 9.7 (Calculate your answer to the nearest 0.1 energy unit, and be sure to specify units, kJ/mol or kcal/mol. The answer is case sensitive.) H. H Previous Nextarrow_forwardA certain half-reaction has a standard reduction potential Ered +1.26 V. An engineer proposes using this half-reaction at the anode of a galvanic cell that must provide at least 1.10 V of electrical power. The cell will operate under standard conditions. Note for advanced students: assume the engineer requires this half-reaction to happen at the anode of the cell. Is there a minimum standard reduction potential that the half-reaction used at the cathode of this cell can have? If so, check the "yes" box and calculate the minimum. Round your answer to 2 decimal places. If there is no lower limit, check the "no" box.. Is there a maximum standard reduction potential that the half-reaction used at the cathode of this cell can have? If so, check the "yes" box and calculate the maximum. Round your answer to 2 decimal places. If there is no upper limit, check the "no" box. yes, there is a minimum. 1 red Πν no minimum Oyes, there is a maximum. 0 E red Dv By using the information in the ALEKS…arrow_forward
- (11pts total) Consider the arrows pointing at three different carbon-carbon bonds in the molecule depicted below. Bond B Bond A Bond C a. (2pts) Which bond between A-C is weakest? Which is strongest? Place answers in appropriate boxes. Weakest Bond Strongest Bond b. (4pts) Consider the relative stability of all cleavage products that form when bonds A, B, AND C are homolytically cleaved/broken. Hint: cleavage products of bonds A, B, and C are all carbon radicals. i. Which ONE cleavage product is the most stable? A condensed or bond line representation is fine. ii. Which ONE cleavage product is the least stable? A condensed or bond line representation is fine. c. (5pts) Use principles discussed in lecture, supported by relevant structures, to succinctly explain the why your part b (i) radical is more stable than your part b(ii) radical. Written explanation can be no more than one-two succinct sentence(s)!arrow_forward. 3°C with TH 12. (10pts total) Provide the major product for each reaction depicted below. If no reaction occurs write NR. Assume heat dissipation is carefully controlled in the fluorine reaction. 3H 24 total (30) 24 21 2h • 6H total ● 8H total 34 래 Br2 hv major product will be most Substituted 12 hv Br NR I too weak of a participate in P-1 F₂ hv Statistically most favored product will be major = most subst = thermo favored hydrogen atom abstractor to LL Farrow_forwardFive chemistry project topic that does not involve practicalarrow_forward
- Please correct answer and don't used hand raitingarrow_forwardQ2. Consider the hydrogenation of ethylene C2H4 + H2 = C2H6 The heats of combustion and molar entropies for the three gases at 298 K are given by: C2H4 C2H6 H2 AH comb/kJ mol¹ -1395 -1550 -243 Sº / J K¹ mol-1 220.7 230.4 131.1 The average heat capacity change, ACP, for the reaction over the temperature range 298-1000 K is 10.9 J K¹ mol¹. Using these data, determine: (a) the standard enthalpy change at 800 K (b) the standard entropy change at 800 K (c) the equilibrium constant at 800 K.arrow_forward13. (11pts total) Consider the arrows pointing at three different carbon-carbon bonds in the molecule depicted below. Bond B Bond A Bond C a. (2pts) Which bond between A-C is weakest? Which is strongest? Place answers in appropriate boxes. Weakest Bond Strongest Bond b. (4pts) Consider the relative stability of all cleavage products that form when bonds A, B, AND C are homolytically cleaved/broken. Hint: cleavage products of bonds A, B, and C are all carbon radicals. i. Which ONE cleavage product is the most stable? A condensed or bond line representation is fine. ii. Which ONE cleavage product is the least stable? A condensed or bond line representation is fine. c. (5pts) Use principles discussed in lecture, supported by relevant structures, to succinctly explain the why your part b (i) radical is more stable than your part b(ii) radical. Written explanation can be no more than one-two succinct sentence(s)! Googlearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage Learning
ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781259911156Author:Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Instrumental AnalysisChemistryISBN:9781305577213Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. CrouchPublisher:Cengage Learning
Organic ChemistryChemistryISBN:9780078021558Author:Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Chemistry: Principles and ReactionsChemistryISBN:9781305079373Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. HurleyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind...ChemistryISBN:9781118431221Author:Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. BullardPublisher:WILEY
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305957404
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781259911156
Author:Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305577213
Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9780078021558
Author:Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305079373
Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind...
Chemistry
ISBN:9781118431221
Author:Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard
Publisher:WILEY