The Social media F modified its rules by permitting the posts of the teens to become public. In prior to its change, Media F permitted 13-17 year old individual’s posts to be viewed only by their friends of friends, and only by their friends. Few criticism on the decision of F arises, few argues that the change in their decision affects the safety of the individuals mainly the children. Media F’s response for that argument was that the policy change was due to teenagers wish to post publicly mainly for fund raising or for any social messages and activates. However, few precautions like a warnings was given to the teens before posting it publicly. Characters in given case: Company F: A famous social media. To discuss: Whether Media F is acting responsibly or just attempting to monetize children’s as critics claim:

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 20, Problem 20.9AC

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

The Social media F modified its rules by permitting the posts of the teens to become public. In prior to its change, Media F permitted 13-17 year old individual’s posts to be viewed only by their friends of friends, and only by their friends.

Few criticism on the decision of F arises, few argues that the change in their decision affects the safety of the individuals mainly the children. Media F’s response for that argument was that the policy change was due to teenagers wish to post publicly mainly for fund raising or for any social messages and activates. However, few precautions like a warnings was given to the teens before posting it publicly.

Characters in given case:

Company F: A famous social media.

To discuss: Whether Media F is acting responsibly or just attempting to monetize children’s as critics claim:

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Facebook recently announced that it will let teens’ posts become public. Before the change, Facebook would only allow 13- to 17-year-old users’ posts to be seen by their “friends” and “friends of friends.” Now, however, their posts can be seen by anyone on the network if they choose to make their posts “public.” Twitter, another social medium gaining popularity with teens, has always let users, including teens, share tweets publicly. But because of Facebook’s vast reach, privacy advocates are very concerned about this latest development, particularly when it comes to children’s safety. Online predators and bullying are real safety issues facing youth. Other criticisms of Facebook’s decision boil down to money—some argue that this is just about monetizing kids. Facebook will be able to offer a younger demographic to advertisers wanting to reach them. Facebook defends its actions, saying the change in policy is due to teenagers wanting the ability to post publicly, primarily for…

With how much information Facebook and other such sites hold on its users, why should they care about privacy when shopping?

Facebook Analytics help businesses trace a specific user across all of their browsers and devices when signed on to Facebook. This information leads to targeted online marketing campaigns. Give an example of an experience. Is it worth regulating this industry? What are some potential costs of doing so?