Foundations of Economics (8th Edition)
Foundations of Economics (8th Edition)
8th Edition
ISBN: 9780134486819
Author: Robin Bade, Michael Parkin
Publisher: PEARSON
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 20, Problem 1SPPA
To determine

Country which has unequal distribution of income-Australia or the United States.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Here, as given the below table shows that the distribution of market income in Australia.

Table: 1

HouseholdsMarket income (%)
Lowest 20%1
Second 20%3
Third 20%15
Fourth 20%26
Highest 20%55

Here, two sectors of the economy are Household and Business. Household sector owns all factors of production like land, labor and capital. These factors are required for production, which is carried out by business sector. Business sector has to pay price for getting these factors. Landowner will get rent, labor will receive wages and interest is paid to the owner of capital. Sum of the earnings from factors is known as household's market income.

Thus, household's income is the amount that he receives in a given period from factors.

In a country, the distribution of income is the important point. It indicates what percentage of income is flowing to a specific percentage of the total household. Total population is divided into few equal sized groups in ascending order from low income to high income. If total household is divided into five equal groups, then it is known as quintiles.

Then, in quintiles, each group consists of 20 percent of the total households. Considering market income percent of each group, income distribution table of an economy is formed.

Considering the market distribution of income in Australia as given in table 1 in the problem following cumulative distribution of income can be shown-

Cumulative Market Income distribution table of Australia:

Groups
Percentage of
Cumulative percentage of
Households
Income
Households
Income
A
Lowest 20%
1
20%
1
B
Second 20%
3
40%
4
C
Third 20%
15
60%
19
D
Fourth 20%
26
80%
45
E
Highest 20%
55
100%
100

In the above table: 2, entire households have been divided into five equal groups A to E. Each group consists of 20 percent of total households. There market income figures are taken from table 1.

Cumulative is the summation of all figures of the group and earlier groups. For group A, cumulative percentages and table: 2 figures are same since no other groups are available before group A. Cumulative figures of group B is the summation of percentage of group B and its earlier group A. Then, cumulative percentage of households is 20+20=40 percent and the cumulative percentage of income against group B is

  1+3=4 .

In this manner, cumulative percentage of group C households is 20+20+20=60 and the cumulative percentage of market income is 1+3+15=19. Cumulative percentage of last group will be always 1, since all other groups are coming before this group.

Lorenz curve is a diagram, which reflects unequal distribution pattern of market income in an economy. The diagram is drawn below:

Foundations of Economics (8th Edition), Chapter 20, Problem 1SPPA

In the diagram, X-axis shows cumulative percentage of households and Y-axis measures the percentage of market income. Red curve is the actual percentage of income flowing to different subsections of people. Straight line is the curve when distribution is equal. Suppose 20% of total population receives exactly 20% of total income, then the distribution is equal. It will lie on a point of the linear curve. Hence, deviation of actual distribution line from equal distribution line will indicate level of unequal distribution. More the actual line deviates from linear line, more will be the level of unequal distribution.

Inequality of the distribution pattern of income in Australia and United states can be compared by drawing Lorenz curve of the two countries. In order to draw Lorenz curve of United States following data of the table are considered. The data below is the market income distribution of United States.

Cumulative Market income distribution table of United States:

GroupsPercentage of Cumulative percentage of
HouseholdsIncomeHouseholds Income
A1
Lowest 20%
0.9
20%
0.9
B1
Second 20%
7.1
40%
8.0
C1
Third 20%
14.3
60%
22.3
D1
Fourth 20%
24.4
80%

46.7
E1
Highest 20%
53.3
100%
100

Above data has been used to draw Lorenz curve of United States in the diagram above by a blue curve.

In the diagram, blue curve is closer to the straight line than red curve. Then, inequality in income distribution in United States is less than the inequality in income distribution at Australia.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept Introduction:

When there is huge difference between wealth of people living in a country, thereby leading to difference in living standard, is considered as inequality.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Richard has just opened a new restaurant. Not being good at deserts, he has contracted with Carla to provide pies. Carla’s costs are $10 per pie, and she sells the pies to Richard for $25 each. Richard resells them for $50, and he incurs no costs other than the $25 he pays Carla. Assume Carla’s costs go up to $30 per pie. If courts always award expectation damages, which of the following statements is most likely to be true?
Difference-in-Difference In the beginning of 2001, North Dakota legalized fireworks. Suppose you are interested in studying the effect of the legalizing of fireworks on the number of house fires in North Dakota. Unlike North Dakota, South Dakota did not legalize fireworks and continued to ban them. You decide to use a Difference-in-difference (DID) Model. The numbers of house fires in each state at the end of 2000 and 2001 are as follows: Number of house fires in Number of house fires in Year North Dakota 2000 2001 35 50 South Dakota 54 64 a. What is the change in the outcome for the treatment group between 2000 and 2001? Show your working for full credit. (10 points) b. Can we interpret the change in the outcome for the treatment group between 2000 and 2001 as the causal effect of legalizing fireworks on number of house fires? Explain your answer. (10 points)
C. Regression Discontinuity Birth weight is used as a common sign for a newborn's health. In the United States, if a baby has a birthweight below 1500 grams, the newborn is classified as having “very low birth weight". Suppose you want to study the effect of having very low birth weight on the number of hospital visits made before the baby's first birthday. You decide to use Regression Discontinuity to answer this question. The graph below shows the RD model: Number of hospital visits made before baby's first birthday 5 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 Birthweight (in grams) a. What is the running variable? (5 points) b. What is the cutoff? (5 points) T What is the discontinuity in the graph and how do you interpret it? (10 points)
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617406
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305971493
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning