
Country which has unequal distribution of income-Australia or the United States.

Explanation of Solution
Here, as given the below table shows that the distribution of market income in Australia.
Table: 1
Households | Market income (%) |
Lowest 20% | 1 |
Second 20% | 3 |
Third 20% | 15 |
Fourth 20% | 26 |
Highest 20% | 55 |
Here, two sectors of the economy are Household and Business. Household sector owns all factors of production like land, labor and capital. These factors are required for production, which is carried out by business sector. Business sector has to pay price for getting these factors. Landowner will get rent, labor will receive wages and interest is paid to the owner of capital. Sum of the earnings from factors is known as household's market income.
Thus, household's income is the amount that he receives in a given period from factors.
In a country, the distribution of income is the important point. It indicates what percentage of income is flowing to a specific percentage of the total household. Total population is divided into few equal sized groups in ascending order from low income to high income. If total household is divided into five equal groups, then it is known as quintiles.
Then, in quintiles, each group consists of 20 percent of the total households. Considering market income percent of each group, income distribution table of an economy is formed.
Considering the market distribution of income in Australia as given in table 1 in the problem following cumulative distribution of income can be shown-
Cumulative Market Income distribution table of Australia:
Groups | Percentage of | Cumulative percentage of | ||
Households | Income | Households | Income | |
A | Lowest 20% | 1 | 20% | 1 |
B | Second 20% | 3 | 40% | 4 |
C | Third 20% | 15 | 60% | 19 |
D | Fourth 20% | 26 | 80% | 45 |
E | Highest 20% | 55 | 100% | 100 |
In the above table: 2, entire households have been divided into five equal groups A to E. Each group consists of 20 percent of total households. There market income figures are taken from table 1.
Cumulative is the summation of all figures of the group and earlier groups. For group A, cumulative percentages and table: 2 figures are same since no other groups are available before group A. Cumulative figures of group B is the summation of percentage of group B and its earlier group A. Then, cumulative percentage of households is
In this manner, cumulative percentage of group C households is
Lorenz curve is a diagram, which reflects unequal distribution pattern of market income in an economy. The diagram is drawn below:
In the diagram, X-axis shows cumulative percentage of households and Y-axis measures the percentage of market income. Red curve is the actual percentage of income flowing to different subsections of people. Straight line is the curve when distribution is equal. Suppose 20% of total population receives exactly 20% of total income, then the distribution is equal. It will lie on a point of the linear curve. Hence, deviation of actual distribution line from equal distribution line will indicate level of unequal distribution. More the actual line deviates from linear line, more will be the level of unequal distribution.
Inequality of the distribution pattern of income in Australia and United states can be compared by drawing Lorenz curve of the two countries. In order to draw Lorenz curve of United States following data of the table are considered. The data below is the market income distribution of United States.
Cumulative Market income distribution table of United States:
Groups | Percentage of | Cumulative percentage of | ||
Households | Income | Households | Income | |
A1 | Lowest 20% | 0.9 | 20% | 0.9 |
B1 | Second 20% | 7.1 | 40% | 8.0 |
C1 | Third 20% | 14.3 | 60% | 22.3 |
D1 | Fourth 20% | 24.4 | 80% | 46.7 |
E1 | Highest 20% | 53.3 | 100% | 100 |
Above data has been used to draw Lorenz curve of United States in the diagram above by a blue curve.
In the diagram, blue curve is closer to the straight line than red curve. Then, inequality in income distribution in United States is less than the inequality in income distribution at Australia.
Concept Introduction:
When there is huge difference between wealth of people living in a country, thereby leading to difference in living standard, is considered as inequality.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
Foundations of Economics (8th Edition)
- 4. The table below shows the labor requirements for Mr. and Mrs. Howell for pineapples and coconuts. Which is the most accurate statement? A. Mrs. Howell has a comparative advantage in coconuts and the opportunity cost of 1 coconut for Mrs. Howell is 4 pineapples B. Mrs. Howell has a comparative advantage in pineapples and the opportunity cost of 1 pineapple for Mrs. Howell is .25 coconuts. C. Mr. Howell has a comparative advantage in pineapples and the opportunity cost of 1 pineapple is 1 coconut. D. Mr. Howell has a comparative advantage in both pineapples and coconuts and should specialize in pineapples. Labor Requirements for Pineapples and Coconuts 1 Pineapple 1 Coconut Mr. Howell 1 hour 1 hour Mrs. Howell 1/2 hour 2 hoursarrow_forward4. Supply and Demand. The table gives hypothetical data for the quantity of electric scooters demanded and supplied per month. Price per Electric Scooter Quantity Quantity Demanded Supplied $150 500 250 $175 475 350 $200 450 450 $225 425 550 $250 400 650 $275 375 750 a. Graph the demand and supply curves. Note if you prefer to hand draw separately, you may and insert the picture separately. Price per Scooter 300 275 250 225 200 175 150 250 400 375425475 350 450 550 650 750 500 850 Quantity b. Find the equilibrium price and quantity using the graph above. c. Illustrate on your graph how an increase in the wage rate paid to scooter assemblers would affect the market for electric scooters. Label any new lines in the same graph above to distinguish changes. d. What would happen if there was an increase in the wage rate paid to scooter assemblers at the same time that tastes for electric scooters increased? 1ངarrow_forward3. Production Costs Clean 'n' Shine is a competitor to Spotless Car Wash. Like Spotless, it must pay $150 per day for each automated line it uses. But Clean 'n' Shine has been able to tap into a lower-cost pool of labor, paying its workers only $100 per day. Clean 'n' Shine's production technology is given in the following table. To determine its short-run cost structure, fill in the blanks in the table. Fill in the columns below. Outpu Capita Labor TFC TVC TC MC AFC AVC ATC 1 0 30 1 1 70 1 2 120 1 3 160 1 4 190 1 5 210 1 6 a. Over what range of output does Clean 'n' Shine experience increasing marginal returns to labor? Over what range does it experience diminishing marginal returns to labor? (*answer both questions) b. As output increases, do average fixed costs behave as described in the text? Explain. C. As output increases, do marginal cost, average variable cost, and average total cost behave as described in the text? Explain. d. Looking at the numbers in the table, but without…arrow_forward
- 2. Elasticity and the Minimum Wage - The following graph depicts two labor markets for cashiers. We assume the same supply curve (cashiers respond similarly to wage offers in each city) but different demand functions (employer demand is more elastic – more responsive to wages - in one city than the other, perhaps because one has higher quality retail stores than the other). The y-axis shows hourly wages in dollars; the x-axis shows the number of employees in hundreds. Wage 12 11 29 10 9 00 8 7 Supply 5 4 3 2 1 D2 12 D1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Employment 11 With minimum wage of 8 dollars: A. What is the equilibrium level of employment before the minimum wage is imposed? B. A) According to the graph and given a minimum wage of 8 dollars, how many workers would employers want to hire if the demand for workers in City #1 looked like D1? B) How does that number compare to the market equilibrium employment? C. A) In City #1 (with demand curve D1), would there be an excess supply of…arrow_forwardThe demand function for organic apples is given by Qd = 20 – 2P while the supply function is given by Qs = 4P – 10.a. Solve for the equilibrium P* and Q*.b. Carefully graph the D & S curves. Include all intercepts and P* and Q* (**enlarge your graph so you can better show the questions below use graphing paper**)i. Suppose that the government legislates a $1/gallon to be collected from the buyer. Identify the new equation for the demand curve. Plot the new demand curve (on the same graph as b).ii. Solve for the new equilibrium PT* and QT* and indicate on your graph. On the same graph, indicate the P that consumers pay (PC) and the P that producers get to keep (PS).c. On another graph with the original D and S curves, impose the same tax ($1/gallon) to sellers. Identify the new equation for the supply curve. Plot the new supply curve. i. Solve for the new equilibrium PT* and QT* and indicate on your graph. On thesame graph, indicate the P that consumers pay (PC) and the P that…arrow_forwardDon't use ai to answer I will report you answerarrow_forward
- Explain and evaluate the impact of legislation on the U.S. criminal justice system, specifically on the prison population and its impact on poverty and the U.S. economy. Include significant elements and limitations such as the War on Drugs and the First Step Act.arrow_forwardGiven the following petroleum tax details, calculate the marginal tax rate and explain its significance: Total Revenue: $500 million Cost of Operations: $200 million Tax Rate: 40% Additional Royalty: 5% Profit-Based Tax: 10%arrow_forwardUse a game tree to illustrate why an aircraft manufacturer may price below the current marginal cost in the short run if it has a steep learning curve. (Hint: Show that learning by doing lowers its cost in the second period.) Part 2 Assume for simplicity the game tree is illustrated in the figure to the right. Pricing below marginal cost reduces profits but gives the incumbent a cost advantage over potential rivals. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium?arrow_forward
- Answerarrow_forwardM” method Given the following model, solve by the method of “M”. (see image)arrow_forwardAs indicated in the attached image, U.S. earnings for high- and low-skill workers as measured by educational attainment began diverging in the 1980s. The remaining questions in this problem set use the model for the labor market developed in class to walk through potential explanations for this trend. 1. Assume that there are just two types of workers, low- and high-skill. As a result, there are two labor markets: supply and demand for low-skill workers and supply and demand for high-skill workers. Using two carefully drawn labor-market figures, show that an increase in the demand for high skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers. 2. Using the same assumptions as in the previous question, use two carefully drawn labor-market figures to show that an increase in the supply of low-skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers.arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage LearningMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning





