Concept explainers
Review the kinds of evidence for evolution analyzed in Sections 2.1–2.5. List the sources of evidence that were available to Darwin and those that appeared later. For example, of the evidence for microevolution discussed in Section 2.1, Darwin knew, and wrote, about divergent strains of domestic plants and animals and about vestigial structures. However, in Darwin’s day no one had ever directly observed change across generations in natural populations. For each section, indicate which evidence you consider strongest and which you consider weakest. Explain why.
To review: The kinds of evidence for evolution analyzed.
Introduction: Science is the method of “acquiring knowledge” based on facts learned through experiments and observations. The applications and research studies on science help to improve the standard of lives.
Explanation of Solution
The kinds of evidence for evolution that are analyzed are grouped into 5 categories and are given as follows:
- Evidence of speciation
- Evidence of microevolution
- Evidence from common ancestors
- Evidence from macroevolution
- The age of the Earth.
To list: The sources of evidence that were available to Darwin and those that appeared later.
Explanation of Solution
Evidence of microevolution: It is the study on the way in which the populations change over generations. Selective breeding is one of the situation in which microevolution can take place. Selective breeding is otherwise referred to as artificial selection and occurs when the humans selectively breed useful traits in organisms such as crops and livestock. Darwin knew about different strains of domestic plants and animals and included this in his work.
Evidence of speciation: It is a process of creating a new species from an older one. Both experiments in the laboratory and natural populations are examples of speciation. Evidence from natural populations, such as Darwin’s finches, is available for evidence.
Evidence from common ancestors: Similarity or homology between two organisms also gives the evidence for evolution. Anatomical homologies were known to Darwin but molecular homologies were not.
Evidence from macroevolution: It is the study of macroevolution changes in the fossil record. Fossils are any traces of organisms that lived in the past. The first type of fossil evidence is extinction and succession. Georges Cuvier found species that were only found in the fossil record. Others believed that they were the members of the current species.
The age of the Earth: Hutton suggests that the processes that are responsible for the formation of Earth are still happening today. Based on this, they started to make a geological time scale based on this type.
To explain: The evidence that is considered as the strongest and weakest and the reason corresponding to the decision.
Explanation of Solution
Microevolution is strong evidence for evolution; for example, vestigial structures in the hind limbs of wolves and whales. Wolves and whales are considered to share a common ancestor as whales have hind legs similar to wolves and other walking mammals.
In natural populations, speciation is strong evidence for evolution. Darwin’s finches are strong evidence for speciation that supports evolution.
Common ancestors provide strong evidence for evolution. Both chimps and bonobos shared repeats with humans, but less relative primates such as orangutans and gorillas do not.
Macroevolution provides strong evidence for evolution. Few transitional fossils were identified by Darwin, but a large number of fossils have been discovered today, which provide strong evidence for evolution.
The evidence of age of the Earth is considered as the weakest. The extreme age of the Earth is very important as the process of evolution is comparatively very slow. Without an old Earth, Darwin’s model of evolution would not be possible. Darwin did not know the age of Earth for his theory of evolution and was concerned about a possible young Sun, making the Earth even younger.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
Evolutionary Analysis (5th Edition)
- The theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forwardThe theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forwardDarwin was the first person to note that evolutionary outcomes are probabilistic, meaning that they depend on the likelihood of outcomes rather than on certainties. Explain what this means in the context of Darwin’s theory of how evolution occurs? That is, how is Darwin’s theory is dependent upon the chances of a certain outcome and not on the absolute certainty of any particular outcome?arrow_forward
- Using the concepts of variability, environmental pressure and natural selection, how does the synthetic theory of evolution explain Darwinian natural selection?arrow_forwardUsing the concepts of variability, environmental pressure and natural selection how does the synthetic theory explain the darwinian natural selection?arrow_forwardBriefly discuss the differences in how a selectionist (one that believes that Natural Selection is a strong evolutionary force) and a neutralist (one that believes that genetic drift is a strong evolutionary force) views the following: molecular clock, evolution of coding sequences, evolution of "pseudogenes".arrow_forward
- Lamarck was an early naturalist who published his own ideas about species changing over time. He, however was mistaken about one critical aspect of evolution. If you could travel back in time what advice would you give Lamarck to correct his misunderstanding? Tell him that species actually do change and evolve over time Tell him that traits acquired during an organisms life are not passed on to offspring Tell him that artificial selection does not lead to new varieties of plants and animals Tell him that characteristics are heritable: Parents do pass on their characteristics to their offspringarrow_forwardWhich of the following statements about the history of evolutionary biology is correct? -The Modern Synthesis (or Evolutionary Synthesis) is a period of time in the early 20th century when the Mendelian genetics was integrated into the evolutionary biology. -There are two main parts in the book On the Origin of Species, published by Darwin in 1859: the first is that biological evolution does occur and species arise through descent from common ancestor, with modification, and the second is that natural selection is the main driving force for the process. -The most original contribution by Darwin is the theory of evolution by natural selection. -Modern radiometric dating has pretty much settled the question on the age of the earth. The conclusion is that the earth is old enough for the evolutionary process proposed by Darwin to have taken place. -All of the abovearrow_forwardThe study featured in "This is a Truly Lousy Experiment" relied on well-established conclusions from the classic research of Charles Darwin. From the article, Darwin's research on evolution by natural selection was based on the rationale: If artificial selection by breeders could generate diversity in only a few generations of pigeons, then it would not be surprising that nature would be capable of generating the vast diversity of organisms found on earth. O If natural selection by breeders could generate diversity in only a few generations of pigeons, then it would not be surprising that artificial selection over a very long time, would be capable of generating the vast diversity found on earth. If artificial selection by nature could generate diversity in only a few generations of pigeons, then it would not be surprising that breeders, over a very long time, would be capable of generating the vast diversity found on earth. Charles Darwin did not study diversity and evolution. If…arrow_forward
- 1. a) How does this experiment demonstrate the definition of evolution? b) Fitness of organisms is a function of the environment (that is, organisms best fit to the local environmental conditions leave more surviving offspring). How does this experiment demonstrate this fact?arrow_forwardexplain the following mechanism of evolution: 1. mutations 2. gene flow 3. genetic drift 4. sexual selection 5. natural selectionarrow_forwardhttps://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/110301_pcbresistantcod (ARTICLE LINK) QUESTIONS: 1. Review the process of natural selection. Use the steps to explain how PCB resistance became so common among tomcod in the Hudson. Be sure to include the terms mutation, fitness, selective pressure, and adaptation in your explanation. 2. In this blog post, the author describes the tomcod as "a quick learner" because of the population's adaptation to PCBs. Is "learning" an accurate way to describe the change in the Hudson River tomcod population? Why or why not? 3. The data shown on the map above support the hypothesis that natural selection for PCB resistance has occurred among tomcod in the Hudson. What sort of evidence regarding gene frequencies in different populations would argue against this hypothesis (i.e., imagine what the scientists would have observed in this study if natural selection on the AHR gene had not occurred among Hudson River tomcod)? 4. Why is it not accurate to…arrow_forward
- Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)BiologyISBN:9780134580999Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. HoehnPublisher:PEARSONBiology 2eBiologyISBN:9781947172517Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann ClarkPublisher:OpenStaxAnatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781259398629Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa StouterPublisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
- Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)BiologyISBN:9780815344322Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter WalterPublisher:W. W. Norton & CompanyLaboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781260159363Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, CynthiaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)BiologyISBN:9781260231700Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael WindelspechtPublisher:McGraw Hill Education