Firoz is an accountant who has excellent skills in accountancy but fails to communicate well. He does not understand what the clients say over the phone. He needs a close observation of everything being communicated. He was recruited by Beatrice, however, works with Cathy. Cathy is not satisfied with his communication skills and wants to get rid of him. However, she is satisfied with his preparations for financial reports and reconciliation statements. Characters in the case: Firoz, an accountant Beatrice, a partner of the business Cathy, manager of Firoz Adequate information: As an accountant, Firoz performs the required job but he lacks in communication skills. To determine: The solutions to be taken with the performance of Firoz.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 3ED

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Firoz is an accountant who has excellent skills in accountancy but fails to communicate well. He does not understand what the clients say over the phone. He needs a close observation of everything being communicated.

He was recruited by Beatrice, however, works with Cathy. Cathy is not satisfied with his communication skills and wants to get rid of him. However, she is satisfied with his preparations for financial reports and reconciliation statements.

Characters in the case:

Firoz, an accountant

Beatrice, a partner of the business

Cathy, manager of Firoz

Adequate information:

As an accountant, Firoz performs the required job but he lacks in communication skills.

To determine:

The solutions to be taken with the performance of Firoz.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

One of the major reasons that foreign expatriates have difficulty doing business in the United States is that they do not understand American slang. A business executive recently gave the following three examples of statements that had no direct meaning for her because she was unfamiliar with slang: “he was laughing like hell.” “Don’t worry; it’s a piece of cake.” “Let’s throw these ideas up against the wall and see if any of them stick.” Why did the foreign expat have trouble understanding these statements? Can you phrase these statements in a simpler language so a foreigner can understand them?

At a second job interview, the candidate was asked whether he was Muslim and asked his name. When he gave his name, the employer said they would call him "George" because it was easy to pronounce. The candidate was also asked at the interview about his need for a mosque, what country he was from, and whether he understood what "slang" was. The candidate was not appointed to the position. The interviewer said that he was just trying to be friendly and helpful to the candidate and he did not mean any offense. The candidate felt he was being discriminated against and unfairly targeted. Do you think there was any unfairness or is it acceptable to conduct the interview in this manner? Please explain your answer with your logic.

You are on your first business visit to one of the South Asian countries. You feel confident about your ability to speak the language (you studied the language in school and have taken a refresher course), and you decide to use it. During introductions, you want to break the ice by insisting that everyone call you by your first name. Speculate as to the reaction.