Mathematical Ideas with Integrated Review and Worksheets plus NEW MyLab Math with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (Integrated Review Courses in MyLab Math and MyLab Statistics)
1st Edition
ISBN: 9780321977274
Author: Miller, Charles, Heeren, Vern, HORNSBY, John, Christopher
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Question
Chapter 15.2, Problem 17E
To determine
Whether the Pair wise comparison method violates irrelevant alternatives criterion from provided table when ‘w’ dropped out.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
If Peter is preferred over Ned in a head-to-head comparison and Peter is preferred over MJ and Peter is preferred over May, then Ned should win the election. Does this satisfy the Condorcet Criterion?
a. No, because it should be Peter.
b. No, because it should be MJ.
c. Yes, because it is an election.
d. Yes, because it is a one-on-one comparison.
It is sometimes called a “winner-take-all” method.
a. Plurality Method
b. Borda Count Method
c. Pairwise Comparison
d. Plurality with Elimination
Help me please
Help me please
Chapter 15 Solutions
Mathematical Ideas with Integrated Review and Worksheets plus NEW MyLab Math with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (Integrated Review Courses in MyLab Math and MyLab Statistics)
Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by the Plurality Method A...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by the Plurality Method A...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by Alternative Methods For...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by Alternative MethodsFor...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...
Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Holding a Runoff Election One common solution to...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 21ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 26ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 27ECh. 15.1 - The Pairwise Comparison Method Each table...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 29ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 30ECh. 15.1 - The Borda Method Each table represents a Borda...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 32ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 33ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 34ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 35ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 36ECh. 15.1 - The Coombs Method The Coombs method of voting is a...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 38ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 39ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 40ECh. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 9ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 10ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 11ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 12ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 13ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 14ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 15ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 16ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 17ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 18ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 19ECh. 15.2 - Irrelevant Alternatives in a Hare Method Election...Ch. 15.2 - 21. Explain why a violation of the majority...Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 26ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 27ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 28ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 29ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 30ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 31ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 32ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 33ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 34ECh. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Solve each problem.
5. New Trees for Wisconsin...Ch. 15.3 - Apportioning Computers to Schools Enrollments for...Ch. 15.3 - Assigning Faculty to Courses The English...Ch. 15.3 - 8. Apportioning Sailboats to Resorts The number of...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 9ECh. 15.3 - 10. Show that the Webster method apportionment of...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 11ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 12ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 13ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 14ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 15ECh. 15.3 - Find the Huntington-Hill cutoff point for rounding...Ch. 15.3 - Creating a Profile of School Bus Riders Create a...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 18ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 19ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.3 - The standard quotas rounded up to the nearest...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 21ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.4 - 26. The Jefferson and Adams methods are both...Ch. 15 - How many different complete rankings are possible...Ch. 15 - Prob. 2TCh. 15 - Prob. 3TCh. 15 - Prob. 4TCh. 15 - Prob. 5TCh. 15 - Why is the irrelevant alternatives criterion an...Ch. 15 - Prob. 7TCh. 15 - Prob. 8TCh. 15 - Prob. 9TCh. 15 - Prob. 10TCh. 15 - Prob. 11TCh. 15 - Prob. 12TCh. 15 - Prob. 13TCh. 15 - Prob. 14TCh. 15 - Prob. 15TCh. 15 - Prob. 16TCh. 15 - Prob. 17TCh. 15 - Prob. 18TCh. 15 - Prob. 19TCh. 15 - Prob. 20TCh. 15 - Prob. 21TCh. 15 - Prob. 22TCh. 15 - Prob. 23TCh. 15 - Prob. 24TCh. 15 - Prob. 25TCh. 15 - One hundred seats are to be apportioned to 4...Ch. 15 - Prob. 27TCh. 15 - Prob. 28TCh. 15 - Prob. 29TCh. 15 - Explain the Alabama paradox.Ch. 15 - Prob. 31TCh. 15 - Prob. 32T
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- A local amusement park conducted a survey to determine visitors' preferences for different types of rides: roller coasters, water slides, and bumper cars. The survey received 200 responses, and the results are as follows: • 60 people enjoy both roller coasters and water slides, but not bumper cars. • 8 people enjoy both roller coasters and bumper cars, but not water slides. • 28 people enjoy bumper cars but neither roller coasters nor water slides. • 48 people enjoy water slides but not roller coasters. • • 20 people enjoy both roller coasters and bumper cars. 12 people enjoy both water slides and bumper cars. • 16 people do not enjoy any of the three types of rides. Find the number of people who enjoy roller coasters but not water slides and not bumper cars.arrow_forwardELECTION COUNT Three candidates are running for president of a service organization. The preference ranking of the voters are as follows. Rosenthal 1 1 2 3 Salinas 2 1 1 2 Milner 1 1 Number of Voters 13 10 7 10 1. Who would win in a plurality election? 2. Who would win in a plurality election with a runoff between the top two finishers? 3. In a plurality election, could the six voters who ranked Milner first and Salinas second achieve a preferable outcome by voting strategically? 4. In a plurality election with a runoff between the top two candidates, could the six voters who ranked Milner first and Salinas second achieve a preferable outcome by voting strategically? 3. 3. LOarrow_forwardThe members of Math Club are to choose a representative among four candidates, M, A, T, H. The following table shows the result of the election. Number of votes 18 12 2 First Choice H M A H Second Choice A T H А M Third Choice А H T T H Fourth Choice H АМ M A 9. Using pairwise comparison method, who won between candidate M and candidate A? 10. Who won the election using the pairwise comparison method?arrow_forward
- Your Question: Number of voters 21 21 10 34 38 16 1st choice C D B A C A 2nd choice B A C B A D 3rd choice A B A D B B 4th choice D C D C D C Find the winner of the election using the Pairwise Comparison method. For each comparison, enter the number of times each candidate was preferred to the other.A vs. BVotes where A is preferred to B : Votes where B is preferred to A : A vs. CVotes where A is preferred to C : Votes where C is preferred to A : A vs. DVotes where A is preferred to D : Votes where D is preferred to A : B vs. CVotes where B is preferred to C : Votes where C is preferred to B : B vs. DVotes where B is preferred to D : Votes where D is preferred to B : C vs. DVotes where C is preferred to D : Votes where D is preferred to C : Tally the results:Points for A: Points for B: Points for C: Points for D: Who is the winner? A B C D There is a tiearrow_forward2. A fraternity votes to choose a service project--visiting nursing homes, reading with children in elementary schools, or cleaning up a stretch of highway. Their preference rankings are as follows: Number of Voters 3 1 4 8 2 Visiting nursing homes 1 1 2 3 2 Reading with children 2 3 1 1 3 Cleaning highway 3 2 3 2 1 Is there a Condorcet winner? If there is no Condorcet winner, is there a Weak Condorcet winner? Show the work you do in deciding, including vote totals, and state your conclusion.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...
Algebra
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:McGraw Hill
Chi Square test; Author: Vectors Academy;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f53nXHoMXx4;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY