Mathematical Ideas with Integrated Review and Worksheets plus NEW MyLab Math with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (Integrated Review Courses in MyLab Math and MyLab Statistics)
1st Edition
ISBN: 9780321977274
Author: Miller, Charles, Heeren, Vern, HORNSBY, John, Christopher
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Question
Chapter 15.1, Problem 35E
To determine
whether Coombs method is an improvement of Hare method.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Select one of the following awards for this discussion:
Academy Award for Best Picture
Grammy Award for Best Album
Heisman Trophy
Nobel Peace Prize
Pulitzer Price for Fiction
For the award you selected, answer the following four questions:
How are the nominees selected?
Who votes?
What type of voting is used? Remember the methods we studied in this unit - majority, plurality, plurality with elimination, Borda count method, Pairwise comparison method. Is one of these types of voting methods used or another method? Describe the method used.
Who tabulates the results?
A constitutional amendment has the support of 65 out of 100 senators and 292 out of 435 members of the House of Representatives. In order to become law, the amendment must have a 2/3 super majority by both the House and the Senate and also have the support of 75% of the states. Forty states have voted their support. Is it possible for the amendment to become law? Explain.
Use the Bucklin voting method to determine the winner and compare it to the plurality method. Who wins the Bucklin vote and the single
candidate vote? There are 7 voters and the candidates need 4 votes to win. There are 5 candidates for the house of representatives and you
have to rank them by preference.
Voters
A
B
D
E
F
G
Emilio
| Hannah Richard Melissa Howard Howard Emilio
Howard
1st
2nd
Howard
Hannah
Emilio
Emilio
Richard
Melissa
3rd
Melissa
Emilio
Melissa
Richard
Richard
Hannah
Richard
4th
Hannah
Richard
Emilio
Howard
Hannah
Emilio
Howard
5th
Richard
Melissa
Howard Hannah Melissa
Melissa
Hannah
a
Bucklin method: Howard wins with 5, Plurality: There is no winner
b
Bucklin method: Melissa wins with 4, Plurality: There is no winner
Bucklin method: Richard wins with 4, Plurality: There is no winner
d.
Bucklin method: Emilio wins with 5, Plurality: There is no winner
O000
Chapter 15 Solutions
Mathematical Ideas with Integrated Review and Worksheets plus NEW MyLab Math with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (Integrated Review Courses in MyLab Math and MyLab Statistics)
Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by the Plurality Method A...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by the Plurality Method A...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by Alternative Methods For...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by Alternative MethodsFor...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...
Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Holding a Runoff Election One common solution to...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 21ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 26ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 27ECh. 15.1 - The Pairwise Comparison Method Each table...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 29ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 30ECh. 15.1 - The Borda Method Each table represents a Borda...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 32ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 33ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 34ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 35ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 36ECh. 15.1 - The Coombs Method The Coombs method of voting is a...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 38ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 39ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 40ECh. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 9ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 10ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 11ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 12ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 13ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 14ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 15ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 16ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 17ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 18ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 19ECh. 15.2 - Irrelevant Alternatives in a Hare Method Election...Ch. 15.2 - 21. Explain why a violation of the majority...Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 26ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 27ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 28ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 29ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 30ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 31ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 32ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 33ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 34ECh. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Solve each problem.
5. New Trees for Wisconsin...Ch. 15.3 - Apportioning Computers to Schools Enrollments for...Ch. 15.3 - Assigning Faculty to Courses The English...Ch. 15.3 - 8. Apportioning Sailboats to Resorts The number of...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 9ECh. 15.3 - 10. Show that the Webster method apportionment of...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 11ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 12ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 13ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 14ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 15ECh. 15.3 - Find the Huntington-Hill cutoff point for rounding...Ch. 15.3 - Creating a Profile of School Bus Riders Create a...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 18ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 19ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.3 - The standard quotas rounded up to the nearest...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 21ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.4 - 26. The Jefferson and Adams methods are both...Ch. 15 - How many different complete rankings are possible...Ch. 15 - Prob. 2TCh. 15 - Prob. 3TCh. 15 - Prob. 4TCh. 15 - Prob. 5TCh. 15 - Why is the irrelevant alternatives criterion an...Ch. 15 - Prob. 7TCh. 15 - Prob. 8TCh. 15 - Prob. 9TCh. 15 - Prob. 10TCh. 15 - Prob. 11TCh. 15 - Prob. 12TCh. 15 - Prob. 13TCh. 15 - Prob. 14TCh. 15 - Prob. 15TCh. 15 - Prob. 16TCh. 15 - Prob. 17TCh. 15 - Prob. 18TCh. 15 - Prob. 19TCh. 15 - Prob. 20TCh. 15 - Prob. 21TCh. 15 - Prob. 22TCh. 15 - Prob. 23TCh. 15 - Prob. 24TCh. 15 - Prob. 25TCh. 15 - One hundred seats are to be apportioned to 4...Ch. 15 - Prob. 27TCh. 15 - Prob. 28TCh. 15 - Prob. 29TCh. 15 - Explain the Alabama paradox.Ch. 15 - Prob. 31TCh. 15 - Prob. 32T
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- An employer surveys employees to see which lunch choice they should have at a work picnic. Here are the results: First choice Second choice Third choice 8 voters Tacos 41 11 8 6 voters Pizza Sandwiches Pizza 3 voters Sandwiches Tacos Sandwiches Based on these results, how many points do tacos get using the Borda count method? 3 voters Tacos Pizza Pizza Sandwiches Tacos 45 Pizza wins. Tacos are eliminated in the first round, so pizza moves up in the first column.arrow_forwardUse the plurality with elimination method to determine the winner and compare it to the plurality method. Who wins the preferential vote and the single candidate vote? There are 74 voters and the candidates need 37 votes to win. There are 5 candidates for the house of representatives and you have to rank them by preference. Votes 20 16 12 15 11 1st Emilio Howard Richard Melissa Hannah 2nd Howard Melissa Hannah Hannah Emilio 3rd Melissa Emilio Melissa Richard Richard 4th Hannah Richard Emilio Howard Howard 5th Richard Hannah Howard Emilio Melissa a Plurality with elimination: Richard wins with 43, Plurality: Emilio wins with 20 Plurality with elimination: Melissa wins with 43, Plurality: Emilio wins with 20 Plurality with elimination: Hannah wins with 43, Plurality: Emilio wins with 20 d. Plurality with elimination: Emilio wins with 37, Plurality: Emilio wins with 20arrow_forwardA sample of 20 registered voters was surveyed in which the respondents were asked, "Do you think Chang, Johnson, Ohm, or Smith is most qualified to be a senator?" The results of the survey are shown in the table. (a) Determine the mode candidate. Chang Chang Smith Johnson Smith Smith Smith Ohm Ohm Ohm Ohm Chang Ohm Ohm Chang Smith Ohm Ohm Johnson Johnson Ohm Smith Chang Ohm (b) Do you think it would be a good idea to rotate the candidate choices in the question? Why? Complete parts (a) and (b) to the right. O A. Yes, to make the resulting counts all closer to each other O B. Yes, to confuse the respondents OC. Yes, to avoid response bias O D. There is no need to rotate the choices.arrow_forward
- Alex believes the honor roll students at his school have an unfair advantage in being assigned to the science class they request. He asked 500 students at his school the following questions: "Are you on the honor roll?" and "Did you get the science class you requested?" The results are shown in the table below: Help Alex determine if all students at his school have an equal opportunity to get into the science class they requested. Show your work, and explain your process for determining the fairness of the class assignment process.arrow_forwardA school principal wants to determine which type of speaker the ștudents prefer to invite to an assembly for the entire student population. Which survey method would produce the best representative sample? A survey every fifth person who shops at a mall B survey all of the students on the student .council C survey every tenth student entering the school one morning. D survey all of the students who went to the last basketball gamearrow_forwardA radio talk show host with a large listening audience is interested in the proportion p of adults in his listening area that think that the United States should not be at war in Afghanistan. He asks this question to his listeners "Do you think the United States should be at war in Afghanistan?" He asks his listeners to phone in and vote "yes" if they agree that the United States should be at war in Afghanistan and "no" if they disagree. Of the 100 people who phoned in 85% answered "yes". Which of the following assumptions for inference about a proportion using a confidence interval was violated? Select one: 1. The data are a simple random sample from the population of interest. 2.There appear to be no violations. 3. The sample size "n" is so large that both the count of successes n * p and the count of failures n(1-p) are 10 or more 4.The population is at least 10 times as large as the sample.arrow_forward
- My friends and I are trying to decide where to go on vacation this summer. Paris (P), Italy (I), or Spain (S). Below is a table of our votes: Rachel Julie Toni Pat Sam 1st Choice I P I S S 2nd Choice S I P P I 3rd Choice P S S I P Show how {P, I or S} wins using the Borda count method Show how {P, I or S} wins using the plurality-with-elimination method Show how {P, I or S} wins using the pairwise comparison method Show how {P, I or S} wins using the majority vote methodarrow_forwardMary is interested in whether Proposition P will be passed in the next election. She goes to the university library and takes a poll of 100 students. Since 55% favor Proposition P, Mary believes it will pass. Explain what is wrong with her approach. Choose the correct answer below. A. Mary took too small a sample. There were not enough students surveyed to determine for sure that the proposition will pass. O B. Mary took a convenience sample. The students may not be representative of the voting population, so the proposition may not pass. O C. The proportion is too close to 50% for an accurate conclusion to be made.arrow_forwardA vote is to be taken among the residents of a town and the surrounding county to determine whether a proposed chemical plant should be constructed. The construction site is within the town limits, and for this reason many voters in the county believe that the proposal will pass because of the large proportion of town voters who favor the construction. To determine if there is a significant difference in the proportions of town voters and county voters favoring the proposal, a poll is taken. If 120 of 200 town voters favor the proposal and 240 of 500 county residents favor it, would you agree that the proportion of town voters favoring the proposal is higher than the proportion of county voters? Use an α = 0.05 level of significance.arrow_forward
- The city of Raleigh has 6,000 registered voters. There are two candidates for city council in an upcoming election: Brown and Feliz. The day before the election, a telephone poll of 350 randomly selected registered voters was conducted. 151 said they'd vote for Brown, 191 said they'd vote for Feliz, and 8 were undecided.Use this information from the sample to complete the following statements about the population of all registered voters in Raleigh. Round your answers to the nearest person.Based on this sample, we could expect _____ of the 6,000 registered voters to vote for Brown. Based on this sample, we could expect _____ of the 6,000 registered voters to vote for Feliz. Based on this sample, _____ of the 6,000 registered voters are still undecided.arrow_forwardYour Question: Number of voters 21 21 10 34 38 16 1st choice C D B A C A 2nd choice B A C B A D 3rd choice A B A D B B 4th choice D C D C D C Find the winner of the election using the Pairwise Comparison method. For each comparison, enter the number of times each candidate was preferred to the other.A vs. BVotes where A is preferred to B : Votes where B is preferred to A : A vs. CVotes where A is preferred to C : Votes where C is preferred to A : A vs. DVotes where A is preferred to D : Votes where D is preferred to A : B vs. CVotes where B is preferred to C : Votes where C is preferred to B : B vs. DVotes where B is preferred to D : Votes where D is preferred to B : C vs. DVotes where C is preferred to D : Votes where D is preferred to C : Tally the results:Points for A: Points for B: Points for C: Points for D: Who is the winner? A B C D There is a tiearrow_forwardsolve asap within 15 mins with explanationarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...MathISBN:9781259676512Author:Kenneth H RosenPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Mathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...MathISBN:9780134392790Author:Beckmann, SybillaPublisher:PEARSON
Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)MathISBN:9780134683713Author:Robert F. BlitzerPublisher:PEARSON
Discrete Mathematics With ApplicationsMathISBN:9781337694193Author:EPP, Susanna S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)MathISBN:9781259985607Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. MercerPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...
Math
ISBN:9781259676512
Author:Kenneth H Rosen
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Mathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...
Math
ISBN:9780134392790
Author:Beckmann, Sybilla
Publisher:PEARSON
Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)
Math
ISBN:9780134683713
Author:Robert F. Blitzer
Publisher:PEARSON
Discrete Mathematics With Applications
Math
ISBN:9781337694193
Author:EPP, Susanna S.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)
Math
ISBN:9781259985607
Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. Mercer
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Graph Theory: Euler Paths and Euler Circuits; Author: Mathispower4u;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5M-m62qTR-s;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
WALK,TRIAL,CIRCUIT,PATH,CYCLE IN GRAPH THEORY; Author: DIVVELA SRINIVASA RAO;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYVltZtnAik;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY