British Petroleum's Deepwater Horizon offshore rig in the Gulf of Mexico exploded in a ball of flames on April 20, 2010, killing 11 employees. This initial tragedy set in motion frantic efforts to stop the flow of oil, followed by a long and arduous cleanup process. Thunder Horse oil platform "listing precariously to one side, looking for all world as if it were about to sink." Thunder Horse was meant to be the company's crowning glory, the embodiment of its bold gamble to outpace its competitors in finding and exploiting the vast reserves of oil beneath the waters of the gulf. The problem with the rig soon became evident. A valve installed backwards caused it to flood during the hurricane even before any oil had been pumped. Other problems included a welding job so shoddy that it left underwater pipelines brittle and full of cracks. There were warning signs that something was terribly wrong with the oil well. Among the red flags were several equipment readings suggesting that gas was bubbling into the well, a potential sign of an impending blowout. Those red flags were ignored. Characters in the case: No prominent characters in the case. Adequate information: Federal panel charged with investigating the spill examined 20 "anomalies in the well's behavior and the crew's response." The panel's final report blamed both BP and its contractors for the failures that led to the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon. Many of those failings stemmed from shortcuts to save time and money. However, the report also faulted the government for lax oversight of the companies. To explain: The reason you think company employees ignored the red flags. The way this behavior be changed in the future.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 40DQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

British Petroleum's Deepwater Horizon offshore rig in the Gulf of Mexico exploded in a ball of flames on April 20, 2010, killing 11 employees. This initial tragedy set in motion frantic efforts to stop the flow of oil, followed by a long and arduous cleanup process.

Thunder Horse oil platform "listing precariously to one side, looking for all world as if it were about to sink." Thunder Horse was meant to be the company's crowning glory, the embodiment of its bold gamble to outpace its competitors in finding and exploiting the vast reserves of oil beneath the waters of the gulf.

The problem with the rig soon became evident. A valve installed backwards caused it to flood during the hurricane even before any oil had been pumped. Other problems included a welding job so shoddy that it left underwater pipelines brittle and full of cracks. There were warning signs that something was terribly wrong with the oil well. Among the red flags were several equipment readings suggesting that gas was bubbling into the well, a potential sign of an impending blowout. Those red flags were ignored.

Characters in the case:

No prominent characters in the case.

Adequate information:

Federal panel charged with investigating the spill examined 20 "anomalies in the well's behavior and the crew's response." The panel's final report blamed both BP and its contractors for the failures that led to the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon. Many of those failings stemmed from shortcuts to save time and money. However, the report also faulted the government for lax oversight of the companies.

To explain:

The reason you think company employees ignored the red flags. The way this behavior be changed in the future.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Kim and Park (2011) argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities not only have value for benefitting social causes but can also be regarded as recruiting tools for attracting potential employees who perceive the organization and its CSR activities as an ethical fit. The foundation of this argument comes from an organizational perspective that views employees as important assets for a corporation. Coming from this perspective would mean that corporations would be cognizant about the imperative to have an active CSR program that matches corporate values, missions, and cultures. Walmart Inc is the company of choice. What are Walmart Inc CSR activities? What do these activities communicate about Walmart Inc? Assess whether these activities are cause beneficial or cause exploitative? Give evidence for the answer. Would it be considered working for Walmart Inc?

The following cost data relate to the office overhead costs of Hamilton Accounting Services during the just-completed year: • Office rent: $32,400 Office supplies: $6,980 Utilities, office: $18,250 • Salary, office manager: $62,180 • Salary, receptionist: $40,560 • • Depreciation-office equipment: $13,750 Software licensing fees: $27,320 Other miscellaneous expenses: $35,600 Total overhead costs: $237,040 The company applies overhead costs using a predetermined overhead rate of $7 per accountant hour. A total of 36,200 accountant hours was recorded for the year. Compute the amount of under- or overapplied overhead cost for the year.

Describe the need for financial reports for the following stakeholders.a. The Community (3 marks)b. Creditors (4 marks)