1.
Compute inherent risk.
1.
Answer to Problem 20BEA
Inherent risk is $24,000,000.
Explanation of Solution
Inherent Risk:
Inherent risk is a risk that prevails in a system before any control measure is adopted within an organization.
Computation of inherent risk:
Inherent risk can be computed by using the following formula:
Substitute $80,000,000 for impact and 30% for the probability of occurrence in the above formula.
Therefore, inherent risk is $24,000,000.
2.
Compute residual risk of each of the three alternatives.
2.
Answer to Problem 20BEA
Residual risk for alternative A, B, and C is $16,000,000, $7,500,000, and $24,000,000 respectively.
Explanation of Solution
Residual risk can be computed by using the following formula:
Computation of residual risk for alternative A:
Substitute $80,000,000 for impact and 20% for the probability of occurrence in the above formula.
Computation of residual risk for alternative B:
Substitute $50,000,000 for impact and 15% for the probability of occurrence in the above formula.
Computation of residual risk for alternative C:
Substitute $80,000,000 for impact and 30% for the probability of occurrence in the above formula.
Therefore, residual risk for alternative A, B, and C is $16,000,000, $7,500,000, and $24,000,000 respectively.
3.
Compute benefit from each of the three alternatives.
3.
Answer to Problem 20BEA
Benefitfrom alternatives A, B, and C is $8,000,000, $16,500,000, and $0 respectively.
Explanation of Solution
Benefit from a risk response alternative can be computed by using the following formula:
Computation of response benefit from alternative A:
Substitute $24,000,000 for inherent risk and $16,000,000 for residual risk in the above formula.
Computation of response benefit from alternative B:
Substitute $24,000,000 for inherent risk and $7,500,000 for residual risk in the above formula.
Computation of response benefit from alternative C:
Substitute $24,000,000 for inherent risk and $24,000,000 for residual risk in the above formula.
Therefore, benefit from alternatives A, B, and C is $8,000,000, $16,500,000, and $0 respectively.
4.
Compute net benefit from each of the three alternatives.
4.
Answer to Problem 20BEA
Net benefit from alternatives A, B, and C is $5,000,000, $3,500,000, and $0 respectively.
Explanation of Solution
Net benefit from a risk response alternative can be computed by using the following formula:
Computation of net benefit from alternative A:
Substitute $8,000,000 for response benefit and $3,000,000 for response cost in the above formula:
Computation of net benefit from alternative B:
Substitute $16,500,000 for response benefit and $13,000,000 for response cost in the above formula:
Computation of net benefit from alternative C:
Substitute $0 for response benefit and $0 for response cost in the above formula:
Therefore, net benefit from alternatives A, B, and C is $5,000,000, $3,500,000, and $0 respectively.
5.
Identify the alternative which would be adopted by the company.
5.
Explanation of Solution
Alternative A would be chosen by the company since; net benefit is highest in case of alternative A.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 13 Solutions
Bundle: Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Business Decision-Making, Loose-Leaf Version, 7th + CengageNOWv2, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card
- Crazy Fan Guard Company provides security services to popular live sporting event venues. Crazy Fan management has identified one of its top risks as the possibility that restrictions on premium close seating options will severely decrease its sales revenue by lessening the demand for its security services. The table below displays a description of this top risk, an inherent risk assessment, three risk response alternatives, and finally, a residual risk assessment. Crazy Fan Guards management accounting team estimates that the incremental cost of implementing response A is 2,200,000, and the incremental cost of implementing response B is 700,000. Required: 1. Calculate the benefit of each risk response alternative A through C. 2. Calculate the net benefit of each risk alternative A through C. 3. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Using net benefit as the criterion, explain the best risk response alternative that Crazy Fan Guard Company management should implement.arrow_forwardJon Jackson Manufacturing is searching for suppliers for its new line of equipment. Jon has narrowed his choices to two sets ofsuppliers. Believing in diversification of risk, Jon would select two suppliers under each choice. However, he is still concernedabout the risk of both suppliers failing at the same time. The “San Francisco option” uses both suppliers in San Francisco. Bothare stable, reliable, and profitable firms, so Jon calculates the “unique-event” risk for either of them to be 0.5%. However, becauseSan Francisco is in an earthquake zone, he estimates the probability of an event that would knock out both suppliers to be 2%.The “North American option” uses one supplier in Canada and another in Mexico. These are upstart firms; John calculates the“unique-event” risk for either of them to be 10%. But he estimates the “super-event” probability that would knock out both of thesesuppliers to be only 0.1%. Purchasing costs would be $500,000 per year using the San Francisco option…arrow_forwardThe Miramar Company is going to introduce one of three new products: a widget, a hummer, or a nimnot. The market conditions (favorable, stable, or unfavorable) will determine the profit or loss the company realizes, as shown in the following payoff table: a. Compute the expected value for each decision and select the best one. b. Develop the opportunity loss table and compute the expected opportunity loss for each product. c. Determine how much the firm would be willing to pay to a market research firm to gain better information about future market conditions.arrow_forward
- Taking into consideration all the information given, determine the Net Present Value of the project and advice the company on whether to invest in the new line of product.Please use the attached images to determine the problem above.arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forwardNote:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forward
- Industry analysts have predicted a sharp decline in housing demand in the months ahead. After learning of this prediction, Nest Home Builders opts to convert as many of its variable costs to fixed costs as possible. This decision O is a wise one, because it will decrease the firm's degree of operating leverage and thus reduce the firm's degree of risk. O is a poor one, because it will increase the firm's degree of operating leverage and thus increase the firm's degree of risk. O is a poor one, because it will decrease the firm's degree of operating leverage and thus increase the firm's degree of risk. O is a wise one, because it will increase the firm's degree of operating leverage and thus reduce the firm's degree of risk. Save for Later Submit Answerarrow_forwardXYZ Co. hires a financial consultant to help evaluate whether or not to launch a new line of perfumed shark attractants. The consultant charges a fee of $10,000, half of which must be paid up-front and half to be paid when the project evaluation is completed. The consultant’s fees can be considered a/an _______ of the project. Select one: a. financing cost b. sunk cost c. opportunity cost d. side effect e. cash outflowarrow_forwardHoward Weiss, Inc., is considering building a sensitive new radiation scanning device. His managers believe that there is a probability of 0.4 that the ATR Co. will come out with a competitive product. If Weiss adds an assembly line for the product and ATR Co does not follow with a competitive product, Weiss's expected profit is $40,000, if Weiss adds an assembly line and ATR follows suit, Weiss still expects $10,000 profit. If Weiss adds a new plant addition and ATR does not produce a competitive product, Weiss expects a profit of $600,000, if ATR does compete for this market, Weiss expects a loss of $100,000 a) Determine the EMV of each decision. b) Compute the expected value of perfect information.arrow_forward
- Please answer.arrow_forwardThe management of Brawn Engineering is considering three alternatives to satisfy an OSHA requirement for safety gates in the machine shop. Each gate will completely satisfy the requirement, so no combinations need to be considered. The first costs, operating costs, and salvage values over a 5-year planning horizon are shown below. Show the comparisons and internal rates of return used to make your decision:arrow_forwardPlease don't use hand rating and correct answerarrow_forward
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Excel Applications for Accounting PrinciplesAccountingISBN:9781111581565Author:Gaylord N. SmithPublisher:Cengage Learning
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And AnalysisAccountingISBN:9781337788281Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald PagachPublisher:Cengage Learning