Subsequent events
• LO13–6
Lincoln Chemicals became involved in investigations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in regard to damages connected to waste disposal sites. Below are four possibilities regarding the timing of (A) the alleged damage caused by Lincoln, (B) an investigation by the EPA, (C) the EPA assessment of penalties, and (D) ultimate settlement. In each case, assume that Lincoln is unaware of any problem until an investigation is begun. Also assume that once the EPA investigation begins, it is probable that a damage assessment will ensue and that once an assessment is made by the EPA, it is reasonably possible that a determinable amount will be paid by Lincoln.
Required:
For each case, decide whether (1) a loss should be accrued in the financial statements with an explanatory note, (2) a disclosure note only should be provided, or (3) no disclosure is necessary.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 13 Solutions
Intermediate Accounting
- QUESTION 3 On June 30, 2020, Duts discovered that it had been manufacturing a product illegally since this product happened to be a patented product for which it did not have the necessary rights., Duts immediately shut down its factory and hired a firm of lawyers to act on its behalf in the acquisition of the necessary rights to manufacture this patented product. Legal fees of PhP 50 000 were incurred during July 2020. The legal process was finalized on July 31, 2020, when Bee was then required to pay PhP 800 000 to purchase the rights, including PhP 80 000 in refundable VAT. During the July factory shut-down: averhead costs of PhP 40 000 were incurred; and significant market share was lost with the result that Bee's total sales over August and September was PhP 20 000 but its expenses were PhP 50 000, resulting in a loss of PhP 30 000. To increase market share, Bee spent an extra PhP 25 000 aggressively marketing their product. This marketing campaign was successful, resulting in…arrow_forwardProblem 4-23 (with solution)arrow_forwardProblem 4-6 (IAA) Baron Company is involved with several situations about contingencies. The fiscal year ends December 31, 2022 and the financial statements are issued on March 31, 2023. On March 1, 2023, the city government is in the process of investigating possible chemical leaks at Baron Company's facilities but has not proposed a deficiency assessment. Management believed an assessment is reasonably possible and if an assessment is made an unfavorable settlement of up to P4,000,000 is reasonably possible. Baron Company is the plaintiff in a P3,000,000 lawsuit filed against Faye Company for damages due to lost profit from rejected contracts and for unpaid accounts receivable. The case is in final appeal and legal counsel advised that it is probable that Baron Company will prevail and be awarded P2,500,000. In July 2022, the provincial government filed suit against Baron Company seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief for violation of environmental law regulating hazardous…arrow_forward
- q15 Which of the following are circumstances that may indicate that the asset may be impaired? (i) A motor vehicle has been damaged in an accident (ii) A debtor is in financial difficulty (iii)Consumer tastes have changed in the market and sales prices of the inventory have been reduced so that the goods will have to be sold at much lower prices, if at all (iv) Cost prices of raw materials used in production have increased Select one: a. (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) b. (i), (ii), (iv) only c. (i) and (iv) only d. (iv) onlyarrow_forwardE10.13arrow_forwardQuestion 20. The amount of provisions that should be recognized at December 31, 2021 is?arrow_forward
- Q23 Which of the following statement(s) is (are) true? (i) An intangible asset is impaired if the carrying amount is higher than its recoverable amount (ii) Recoverable amount is the asset’s fair value or its value-in-use at the reporting date. (iii) For an intangible asset with infinite useful life, impairment test should be performed only if there is evidence to indicate that an intangible asset has been impaired. (iv) For an intangible asset with finite useful life, impairment test should be performed annually even if there is no evidence that the asset has been impaired. Select one: a. (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) b. (i) and (ii) only c. (i) and (iv) only d. (i) onlyarrow_forwardQ21 Which of the following is NOT a step in impairment testing? Select one: a. Sell the asset after if the fair value is greater than the recoverable amount b. Calculate the asset’s carrying amount in the books of the entity c. Calculate the recoverable amount of the asset d. Assess whether there are circumstances that may indicate that the asset should be impaired.arrow_forwardQUESTION ONE [18] Isdaka Ltd is a manufacturer and distributor of mining equipment. One of the company 's competitors instituted legal action against Isdaka Ltd. Before year-end (30 June 2019), the company's legal representatives advised that, although losing the case was unlikely, legal fees and settlement costs could amount to R900 000 in the event that the court case was lost. On 12 March 2020, the judge presiding over the case ruled that Isdaka Limited should pay R1 000 000 to the plaintiff as well as pay all of the plaintiff' s legal fees, which amounted to R180 000. The financial statements had not yet been authorised for issue at the time of the court ruling. Required: Discuss how this information should be treated in the financial statements of Isdaka Ltd. Include all relevant definitionsarrow_forward
- CASE 3On January 1, 20x1, Qwerty, Inc. entered into a construction contract with an owner to build an oil refinery. The oil refinery is highly customized to the owner’s specifications, and changes to these specifications by the owner are expected over the contract term. The oil refinery does not have an alternative use to the contractor. Nonrefundable, interim progress payments are required as a mechanism to finance the contract. The owner can cancel the contract at any time (with a termination penalty); any work in process is the property of the owner. As a result, another entity would not need to reperform the tasks performed to date. Physical possession and title do not pass until completion of the contract. The contractor determines that the contract has a single performance obligation to build the refinery. The preponderance of evidence suggests that the contractor’s performance creates an asset that the customer controls and control are being transferred over time. Qwerty, Inc.…arrow_forward#32 of 20 questions Multiple Choices --Previous Questions-- Multiple Choice Questions The following are risks of ownership Except: OLessee maintained assets OLessee has right to use assets for most or all of it useful life. OLessee runs the risk of technological obsolescence. b) Lessee insures assets OLessee insures asset dyarrow_forward4G+ 12:47 PM 0.4KB/s ill 68 וח 01:14:08 Remaining Multiple Choice Which statement is incorrect with respect to depreciation? Depreciation is not recognized if the fair value of an asset exceeds carrying amount. Depreciation ceases at the earlier between the date the asset is classified as held for sale and the date the asset is derecognized. The depreciation method shall reflect the pattern in which the asset's economic benefits are consumed by the entity. Depreciation of an asset begins when it is available for use or when it is in the location and condition necessary for the intended use. 45 of 75arrow_forward
- Business Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage
- Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:CengageCorporate Financial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781305653535Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan DuchacPublisher:Cengage Learning