To find out from the chi-square test performed in this study, what you may conclude.

Answer to Problem AP4.19CPT
Option (a) is the correct option.
Explanation of Solution
In the question, a study was conducted to find out could the mud wrestling be the cause of a rash contracted by University of Washington students. Thus, from the options we can say that,
Option (a): This can be concluded, because the null hypothesis of the chi-square test states that there is no association, while the alternative hypothesis states that there is an association.
Option (b): This cannot be concluded, because a chi-square test only indicates association and no causation.
Option (c): This cannot be concluded, because there is always evidence in a sample.
Option (d): This cannot be concluded, because we have no information based on the frequency of participating in mud wrestling.
Option (e): This cannot be concluded, because the chi-square test only indicates an association or no association, it does not tell us anything about independence.
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.
Chapter 12 Solutions
PRACTICE OF STATISTICS F/AP EXAM
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Thinking Mathematically (6th Edition)
University Calculus: Early Transcendentals (4th Edition)
Algebra and Trigonometry (6th Edition)
Intro Stats, Books a la Carte Edition (5th Edition)
Basic Business Statistics, Student Value Edition
- BUSINESS DISCUSSarrow_forwardA researcher wishes to estimate, with 90% confidence, the population proportion of adults who support labeling legislation for genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Her estimate must be accurate within 4% of the true proportion. (a) No preliminary estimate is available. Find the minimum sample size needed. (b) Find the minimum sample size needed, using a prior study that found that 65% of the respondents said they support labeling legislation for GMOs. (c) Compare the results from parts (a) and (b). ... (a) What is the minimum sample size needed assuming that no prior information is available? n = (Round up to the nearest whole number as needed.)arrow_forwardThe table available below shows the costs per mile (in cents) for a sample of automobiles. At a = 0.05, can you conclude that at least one mean cost per mile is different from the others? Click on the icon to view the data table. Let Hss, HMS, HLS, Hsuv and Hмy represent the mean costs per mile for small sedans, medium sedans, large sedans, SUV 4WDs, and minivans respectively. What are the hypotheses for this test? OA. Ho: Not all the means are equal. Ha Hss HMS HLS HSUV HMV B. Ho Hss HMS HLS HSUV = μMV Ha: Hss *HMS *HLS*HSUV * HMV C. Ho Hss HMS HLS HSUV =μMV = = H: Not all the means are equal. D. Ho Hss HMS HLS HSUV HMV Ha Hss HMS HLS =HSUV = HMVarrow_forward
- Question: A company launches two different marketing campaigns to promote the same product in two different regions. After one month, the company collects the sales data (in units sold) from both regions to compare the effectiveness of the campaigns. The company wants to determine whether there is a significant difference in the mean sales between the two regions. Perform a two sample T-test You can provide your answer by inserting a text box and the answer must include: Null hypothesis, Alternative hypothesis, Show answer (output table/summary table), and Conclusion based on the P value. (2 points = 0.5 x 4 Answers) Each of these is worth 0.5 points. However, showing the calculation is must. If calculation is missing, the whole answer won't get any credit.arrow_forwardBinomial Prob. Question: A new teaching method claims to improve student engagement. A survey reveals that 60% of students find this method engaging. If 15 students are randomly selected, what is the probability that: a) Exactly 9 students find the method engaging?b) At least 7 students find the method engaging? (2 points = 1 x 2 answers) Provide answers in the yellow cellsarrow_forwardIn a survey of 2273 adults, 739 say they believe in UFOS. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the population proportion of adults who believe in UFOs. A 95% confidence interval for the population proportion is ( ☐, ☐ ). (Round to three decimal places as needed.)arrow_forward
- Find the minimum sample size n needed to estimate μ for the given values of c, σ, and E. C=0.98, σ 6.7, and E = 2 Assume that a preliminary sample has at least 30 members. n = (Round up to the nearest whole number.)arrow_forwardIn a survey of 2193 adults in a recent year, 1233 say they have made a New Year's resolution. Construct 90% and 95% confidence intervals for the population proportion. Interpret the results and compare the widths of the confidence intervals. The 90% confidence interval for the population proportion p is (Round to three decimal places as needed.) J.D) .arrow_forwardLet p be the population proportion for the following condition. Find the point estimates for p and q. In a survey of 1143 adults from country A, 317 said that they were not confident that the food they eat in country A is safe. The point estimate for p, p, is (Round to three decimal places as needed.) ...arrow_forward
- (c) Because logistic regression predicts probabilities of outcomes, observations used to build a logistic regression model need not be independent. A. false: all observations must be independent B. true C. false: only observations with the same outcome need to be independent I ANSWERED: A. false: all observations must be independent. (This was marked wrong but I have no idea why. Isn't this a basic assumption of logistic regression)arrow_forwardBusiness discussarrow_forwardSpam filters are built on principles similar to those used in logistic regression. We fit a probability that each message is spam or not spam. We have several variables for each email. Here are a few: to_multiple=1 if there are multiple recipients, winner=1 if the word 'winner' appears in the subject line, format=1 if the email is poorly formatted, re_subj=1 if "re" appears in the subject line. A logistic model was fit to a dataset with the following output: Estimate SE Z Pr(>|Z|) (Intercept) -0.8161 0.086 -9.4895 0 to_multiple -2.5651 0.3052 -8.4047 0 winner 1.5801 0.3156 5.0067 0 format -0.1528 0.1136 -1.3451 0.1786 re_subj -2.8401 0.363 -7.824 0 (a) Write down the model using the coefficients from the model fit.log_odds(spam) = -0.8161 + -2.5651 + to_multiple + 1.5801 winner + -0.1528 format + -2.8401 re_subj(b) Suppose we have an observation where to_multiple=0, winner=1, format=0, and re_subj=0. What is the predicted probability that this message is spam?…arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





