XYZ Department Store, Inc. (hereinafter, XYZ), whose headquarters are located in the state of California, agrees to purchase coffee from El Rico Café Corp. (hereinafter, Rico Café), whose headquarters are located in Maricao, Puerto Rico. After six (6) months of supplying coffee to XYZ, Rico Café decides to terminate the contract, since the purchasing company owes it $500,000.00. Rico Café decides to start legal action to claim the money owed. However, the coffee distribution contract between the parties does not provide in court as to what status a dispute between the parties would be resolved, should one arise. Imagine that Rico Café decided to present its case before the courts of the state of California and that it does not agree with the decision of the court that received the evidence presented: 3. Discuss the different typical levels of hierarchy that state courts have. 4. To which court would Rico Café have to present its appeal to review the determination with which it disagrees?

XYZ Department Store, Inc. (hereinafter, XYZ), whose headquarters are located in the state of California, agrees to purchase coffee from El Rico Café Corp. (hereinafter, Rico Café), whose headquarters are located in Maricao, Puerto Rico. After six (6) months of supplying coffee to XYZ, Rico Café decides to terminate the contract, since the purchasing company owes it $500,000.00. Rico Café decides to start legal action to claim the money owed. However, the coffee distribution contract between the parties does not provide in court as to what status a dispute between the parties would be resolved, should one arise. Imagine that Rico Café decided to present its case before the courts of the state of California and that it does not agree with the decision of the court that received the evidence presented: 3. Discuss the different typical levels of hierarchy that state courts have. 4. To which court would Rico Café have to present its appeal to review the determination with which it disagrees?

Similar questions

Economics - business law.
Fiona, Celine and Donna have recently commenced a business together making custard pies using the name 'FCD's Custard Pies' as their trading name. They also sell coffee and soft drinks. Only Donna has put capital into the business, and no formal agreement exists between them. However, on many occasions Fiona has purchased stock for the business from their various suppliers by using her own money, and she has also set up an account with the suppliers in the name of 'FCD's Custard Pies'. Celine also has often placed orders on behalf of the business with their various suppliers for stock. 00:0 At their next meeting Fiona suggests selling alcoholic beverages. Donna likes the idea, but Celine does not. Celine says that such a change would require renovation of the shop, and also obtaining a licence to sell alcohol. This requires an application to the relevant government authority, which may reject the application. After giving it lots of thought, Donna decides to leave the business in two…
Granite Insurance Company entered into a treaty reinsurance agreement with Rock Solid Reinsurance (RSR). Granite's retention limit is $400,000 and RSR agreed to provide reinsurance for up to $2.0 million. If Granite writes an $800,000 policy, RSR is responsible for 50 percent of the losses. If Granite insures a $1.6 million risk, RSR is responsible for 75 percent of any losses. What type of reinsurance arrangement did Granite enter into with RSR? ما A) reinsurance pool B) surplus share reinsurance C) facultative reinsurance D) excess of loss reinsurance
Shawn buys 50 widgets at a store closing sale. He buys the widgets intending to use them around the house. He only uses 25, though, and decides to sell the remaining widgets online. Shawn lives in Colorado. He finds an individual buyer, Victoria, in Italy. Does the CISG apply if there is an issue with this contract? O No, because at least one party must be a merchant. Yes, because the contract does not state that the CISG does not apply. O Yes, because the CISG automatically applies when two signatory country parties enter into a contract. No, because the contract does not state that the CISG applies. O No, because these are two consumers.
Andrew is an accountant. He agrees with George, a garage proprietor, that he will assist George with his annual tax return if George will service his car for him on the Monday. At the beginning of the negotiations Andrew told George that he absolutely must have the car for the following Tuesday since he needed it to go to an important meeting with a client to pitch for a valuable deal. Andrew assists George, but because the service was not done correctly the car breaks down when Andrew is on the way to the important meeting. Andrew is very late for this meeting and as a result the client switches his work, worth some £25,000, to another accountant. In addition Andrew incurs £500 costs putting right the defective service. Andrew now wishes to sue George for damages for breach of contract. Question 20 Is Andrew’s claim against George for putting right the defective service A a normal loss B an abnormal loss C neither a normal nor an abnormal loss D both a normal and an abnormal loss…
Hyde is a broker involved in a conflicting demands settlement procedure that has already begun. The escrow funds are held in an attorney's escrow account. Hyde seeks an EDO from the FREC. How will the FREC likely respond? The FREC will not issue an EDO because the funds are in an attorney's escrow account. The FREC will issue an EDO within ten business days. The FREC will issue an EDO if the other three settlement procedures don't work. The FREC will not issue an EDO because the dispute must be settled
Amanda and Emilia are co-directors and members of Griffin Pty Ltd, which imports widgets from Vietnam and sells them in various hardware stores in regional NSW. Griffin has a medium-sized warehouse where it stocks goods, and from which it distributes products. Griffin recently signed a contract to supply a large hardware store in Orange and Dubbo with widgets. So the company ordered 10 pallets of widgets from its Vietnamese supplier and also paid a substantial deposit. A shipping company who carries goods into Australia has already brought the pallets into the country and has sent their bill to Griffin. After a couple of deliveries to the hardware store, a safety issue is discovered with the widgets and the government bans the sale of the widgets. the hardware store cancels all further orders of the widgets. Now, Griffin has no future revenue and its remaining stock of widgets cannot be sold. The shipping company is demanding payment of its invoice; there are also several…
Mr. Oliver entered into contract with his friend Mr. Green to transport some material in two weeks’ time. About a month before the delivery was to be made, the material was banned by the legislature, and so delivery was not possible. Mr. Green could have been arrested by the police if he was caught delivering the goods, but he delivered it anyway. Mr. Oliver refuses to pay. i. What can you say about the contract Mr. Oliver and Mr. Green entered into? ii. Should Mr. Green have made the delivery? why or why not? iii. Can Mr. Green enforce payment? why or why not. iv. What was the impact of the legislative action on the contract?
Analyze how each side interprets the meaning of this contract clause. Whose position is more persuasive? Why? In 1947, Congress passed the Portal-to-Portal Act (a “portal is a doorway). This law said that an employer is not liable to pay workers for the time they spend traveling to work (e.g. an hour-long commute). It also excludes from compensable time, “activities which are preliminary to or postliminary to the principle activity or activities that an employee is employed to perform, which occur either prior to the time on any particular workday at which such employee commences, or subsequent to the time on any particular workday at which he ceases, such principle activity or activities.
What is the purpose of the "Pair and Set" clause in a Property insurance policy? OA) It obliges the insurer to pay a total loss if any item of a pair or set of items is lost or damaged. OB) It limits the liability of the insurer to not more than 25% of the total value of a pair or set that is lost or damaged. OC) It protects the insurer from having to pay for a total loss when only part of a pair or set is lost or damaged. OD) It warrants that earrings of precious or semi-precious stones are properly set in their mounting, failing which no loss will be paid by the insurer.
Farmer grows and sells blueberries. Maine Wild Blueberry Co. agreed to buy all of Farmer’s crop for the next two years under a contract that left the price to be determined. Farmer delivered all of the blueberries he was able to harvest. However, a dispute arose over the amount of blueberries Maine will accept and the price it has to pay. Is there an enforceable contract? If so, what is the amount of blueberries Maine must accept and at what price? Discuss is detail.
Cari enters a single-agency relationship with a listing broker, who owes her full disclosure and loyalty. The listing broker then finds Buyer Bonnie who wants that same broker to represent her in a transaction broker relationship, providing Bonnie with certain duties such as limited confidentiality. Can the broker represent Cari in a single-agency relationship AND represent Bonnie as a transaction broker in the same transaction? No, because offering Bonnie limited confidentiality would conflict with the full disclosure already owed to Cari. Yes, but only if the limited confidentiality owed to Bonnie is needed to fulfill Cari's objective of selling the property. Yes, as long as the broker tries to be fair to br + parties.