The National Society of Professional Engineers (Society) had an ethics rule that prohibited member engineers from disclosing or discussing price and fee information with customers until after the customer had hired a particular engineer. This rule against competitive bidding was designed to maintain high standards in the field of engineering. The Society felt that competitive pressure to offer engineering services at the lowest possible price would encourage engineers to design and specify inefficient, unsafe, and unnecessarily expensive structures and construction methods. According to the Society, awarding engineering contracts to the lowest bidder, regardless of quality, would be dangerous to the public health, safety, and welfare. The Society emphasizes that the rule is not an agreement to fix prices. Rather, it claims the rule was drafted by experienced, highly trained professional engineers to prevent public harm and is therefore reasonable. Does the rule unreasonably restrain trade and thus violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act? Why or why not?

The National Society of Professional Engineers (Society) had an ethics rule that prohibited member engineers from disclosing or discussing price and fee information with customers until after the customer had hired a particular engineer. This rule against competitive bidding was designed to maintain high standards in the field of engineering. The Society felt that competitive pressure to offer engineering services at the lowest possible price would encourage engineers to design and specify inefficient, unsafe, and unnecessarily expensive structures and construction methods. According to the Society, awarding engineering contracts to the lowest bidder, regardless of quality, would be dangerous to the public health, safety, and welfare. The Society emphasizes that the rule is not an agreement to fix prices. Rather, it claims the rule was drafted by experienced, highly trained professional engineers to prevent public harm and is therefore reasonable. Does the rule unreasonably restrain trade and thus violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act? Why or why not?

Similar questions

FAR Part 6 provides the policies and procedures for competition requirements. Explain in detail Full and Open Competition, Full and Open Competition after exclusion of sources, and Other than Full and Open Competition.
Miss Cora Cruz would like to buy products from the company of Aurora P. Tan. To make sure that the supplier will not commit a mistake in the delivery of the said product/products, she specifically mentioned the details in her letter. If you are to be asked, what kind of business letter you will use for this particular purpose? Direction: Write a business letter intended for this transaction. Assume that you are Miss Cora, and the reader is : Dr. Lorna R. Dimatatac, President, TIP Teachers and Employees Credit and Savings Cooperative, 938 Aurora Blvd, Cubao, Quezon City. The following should be considered in your letter: 1. Name of the Articles ordered 2. Description of each item, giving size, style, quality, quantity, material, weight, or whatever will help in identifying the article wanted 3. Catalog number of the item if it available, if not, the page number of the catalog 4. Quantity of each item wanted 5. Price of each item, and the total price of the order 6. Method of…
In 1961, Ford Motor Company acquired Autolite, a manufacturer of spark plugs, in order to enter the profitable aftermarket for spark plugs sold as replacement parts. Ford and the other major automobile manufacturers had previously purchased original equipment spark plugs (those installed in new cars when they leave the factory) from independent producers such as Autolite and Champion, either at or below the producer’s cost. The independents were willing to sell original equipment plugs so cheaply because aftermarket mechanics often replace original equipment plugs with the same brand of spark plug. GM had already moved into the spark plug market by developing its own division. Ford decided to do so by means of a vertical merger under which it acquired Autolite. Prior to the Autolite acquisition, Ford bought 10 percent of the total spark plug output. The merger left Champion as the only major independent spark plug producer. Champion’s market share thereafter declined because Chrysler…
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) files suit against Yange Corp. under § 2 of the Sherman Act. To be successful, the FTC must prove that Yange Corp. possesses monopoly power in the relevant market and that the monopoly power was obtained by illegal means. The FTC has no direct evidence that Yange is using its power to control prices and restrict output. The FTC, therefore, must show that Yange Corp. has monopoly power indirectly, by showing that Yange Corp. has a dominant share of the relevant market and that there are significant barriers for new competitors entering that market. The FTC can calculate the market share that Yange Corp. has by: showing the total sales that Yange Corp. has ever had. × showing the net revenue that Yange Corp. had during their year of highest profits. looking at the company's sales compared against the total sales of the industry within a specific period. taking the total sales of the industry over one year, and comparing against industry sales over prior…
An apartment building in Ithaca, New York with 72 units was financed with a $7.2 million non-recourse first mortgage loan at a 3.6% annual interest rate and an additional $3.6 million fully recourse second mortgage loan at a 7.2% annual interest rate. The owner later borrowed another $720,000 with a fully recourse third mortgage loan at a 10.8% annual interest rate. The borrower ultimately found itself in financial distress and unable to make the monthly mortgage payments on the three outstanding mortgage loans and the property went into foreclosure. What happens to the claims of the second and third mortgage lenders if the foreclosure lawsuit by the first mortgage lender includes all junior mortgage lenders and the property is sold to an unrelated third party for a net price of $6.6 million at the foreclosure sale? a. The mortgage liens of the junior claimants and the loan amounts owed to them are unaffected by the foreclosure sale b. The mortgage liens of the junior claimants are…
Congress is give the exclusive power to adopt regulations under the commerce caluse for which of the following? (Choose all of the correct answer). A. Amtrack train fares between L.A. and Reno, Nevada B. Lyft fares charged in Las Vegas C. Air fares charged by airlines between S.F. and New York D. Bus fares between L.A. county and Phoenix, Arizona E. Catamaran fares between Huntington Beach and San Clemente Island
The group product manager for ointments at American Therapeutic Corporation was reviewing price and promotion alternatives for two products: Rash-Away and Red-Away. Both products were designed to reduce skin irritation, but Red-Away was primarily a cosmetic treatment whereas Rash-Away also included a compound that eliminated the rash. The price and promotion alternatives recommended for the two products by their respective brand managers included the possibility of using additional promotion or a price reduction to stimulate sales volume. A volume, price, and cost summary for the two products follows: Rash-Away Red-Away Unit price $2.00 $1.00 Unit variable costs 1.40 0.25 Unit contribution $0.60 $0.75 Unit volume 1,000,000 units 1,500,000 units Both brand managers included a recommendation to either reduce price by 10 percent or invest an incremental $150,000 in advertising. a. What absolute increase in unit sales and dollar sales will be necessary to recoup the incremental…
Hyde is a broker involved in a conflicting demands settlement procedure that has already begun. The escrow funds are held in an attorney's escrow account. Hyde seeks an EDO from the FREC. How will the FREC likely respond? The FREC will not issue an EDO because the funds are in an attorney's escrow account. The FREC will issue an EDO within ten business days. The FREC will issue an EDO if the other three settlement procedures don't work. The FREC will not issue an EDO because the dispute must be settled
Explain the concept of product liability and the legal obligations of businesses to ensure the safety of their products. Discuss the potential legal consequences for businesses in cases of defective products and consumer harm.
“I think I’m in trouble,” Elvira confided to her husband, Curtis. “I had a customer in today who complained that one of my clerks had discriminated against her and that she was going to sue. I discovered that this same clerk had designed an elaborate scheme to embezzle from me and I intend to press criminal charges. Also, my landlord has stating that the remodeling I did voids my rental agreement and he wants me to vacate in 2 months. I looked at the contract and I’m 99% sure he’s wrong, but I’m no lawyer. I need some legal help!”
A computer manufacturer terminating an electronic store retailer's contract to sell the manufacturer's computers because the electronic store sold the manufacturer's computers at a price which the manufacturer deemed too low is: a per se violation of the Sherman Act. resale price maintenance subject to a rule of reason review. price fixing. none of the above.
Analyze how each side interprets the meaning of this contract clause. Whose position is more persuasive? Why? In 1947, Congress passed the Portal-to-Portal Act (a “portal is a doorway). This law said that an employer is not liable to pay workers for the time they spend traveling to work (e.g. an hour-long commute). It also excludes from compensable time, “activities which are preliminary to or postliminary to the principle activity or activities that an employee is employed to perform, which occur either prior to the time on any particular workday at which such employee commences, or subsequent to the time on any particular workday at which he ceases, such principle activity or activities.