vents affect different people and different groups of people in different ways. Traditionally, history has been told as “great man” history through the eyes of the dominant male class (those writing the history). Can history effectively tell/reflect the story of “the other” (for example, women, indigenous peoples, minorities, different socio-economic classes)? Has this been done in the past? Why or why not? Explain your answer.
vents affect different people and different groups of people in different ways. Traditionally, history has been told as “great man” history through the eyes of the dominant male class (those writing the history). Can history effectively tell/reflect the story of “the other” (for example, women, indigenous peoples, minorities, different socio-economic classes)? Has this been done in the past? Why or why not? Explain your answer.
Traditionally it has been believed that documented historical accounts had been written by men. These intellectual elites were the ones who documented royal life and past events like battles and wars of their period. Most of the time, it was believed that history only constituted only study of chronological events. However, due to such one-sided accounts, other sections of society remained underrepresented. Former schools of historiography were too obsessed with finding the truth of the events and looking at them from a single perspective. This only gave a picture of the past from the point of view of men, the dominant class in society.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
