There must be no possibility of mistakenly executing the innocent if capital punishment is to be morally acceptable. But obviously there is the possibility of executing innocent people. After all, there have been dozens of convictions overturned by subsequent DNA evidence, cases in which people were wrongly convicted and imprisoned. So capital punishment is not morally acceptable. Question 1 What is the conclusion of the argument? There is the possibility of executing innocent people. Capital punishment is not morally acceptable because innocent people have been convicted. Capital punishment is not morally acceptable There have been dozens of convictions overturned by subsequent DNA evidence.
There must be no possibility of mistakenly executing the innocent if capital punishment is to be morally acceptable. But obviously there is the possibility of executing innocent people. After all, there have been dozens of convictions overturned by subsequent DNA evidence, cases in which people were wrongly convicted and imprisoned. So capital punishment is not morally acceptable.
Question 1
What is the conclusion of the argument?
There is the possibility of executing innocent people.
Capital punishment is not morally acceptable because innocent people have been convicted.
Capital punishment is not morally acceptable
There have been dozens of convictions overturned by subsequent DNA evidence.
Question 2
What type of conditional argument is it?
Affirming the antecedent
Denying the antecedent
Denying the consequent
Denying the conditional
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
