The payoff matrix presents the profits for Firms X and Y under their two individual pricing strategies. Suppose both firms have agreed to maximize their combined profits by colluding on their pricing strategies. Use the information in this payoff matrix to answer the two questions. Firm Y strategy Low price Firm X strategy $ 18 Low price Firm X Profit=71 Firm Y Profit = 71 Firm X Profit = 105 Firm Y Profit = 49 High price Firm X Profit = 49 Firm Y Profit = 105 Firm X Profit = 87 Firm Y Profit = 87 High price Compare the profits of Firm X when both firms respect the collusive agreement to the profits of Firm X when Firm X secretly cheats on the agreement. How much additional profit would Firm X earn by secretly cheating on the agreement to collude? Round your answer to the nearest whole number. Compare the profits of Firm Y when both firms respect the collusive agreement to the profits of Firm Y when both firms cheat on the agreement. By how much would the profits of Firm Y fall if both firms cheat on the agreement to collude? Round your answer to the nearest whole number.

The payoff matrix presents the profits for Firms X and Y under their two individual pricing strategies. Suppose both firms have agreed to maximize their combined profits by colluding on their pricing strategies. Use the information in this payoff matrix to answer the two questions. Firm Y strategy Low price Firm X strategy $ 18 Low price Firm X Profit=71 Firm Y Profit = 71 Firm X Profit = 105 Firm Y Profit = 49 High price Firm X Profit = 49 Firm Y Profit = 105 Firm X Profit = 87 Firm Y Profit = 87 High price Compare the profits of Firm X when both firms respect the collusive agreement to the profits of Firm X when Firm X secretly cheats on the agreement. How much additional profit would Firm X earn by secretly cheating on the agreement to collude? Round your answer to the nearest whole number. Compare the profits of Firm Y when both firms respect the collusive agreement to the profits of Firm Y when both firms cheat on the agreement. By how much would the profits of Firm Y fall if both firms cheat on the agreement to collude? Round your answer to the nearest whole number.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2. Four firms (A, B, C, and D) play a pricing game (i.e. Bertrand). Each firm (i) may choose any price Pi from 0 to ¥, with the goal of maximizing its own profit. Firms A and B have MC = 10, while firms C and D have MC = 20. The firms serve a market with the demand curve Q = 100 – P. All firms produce exactly the same product, so consumers purchase only from the firm with the lowest price. If multiple firms have the same low price, consumers divide their quantities evenly among the low-priced firms. Assume the firms choose price simultaneously. a. There are many equilibria in this simultaneous-move pricing game. Provide one equilibrium combination of prices, and argue that no firm has a unilateral incentive to deviate from these prices. Now assume firm A chooses price first. Firm B observes this choice and then chooses its own price second. Firm C chooses price third, and firm D chooses price last. b. Again, there are many equilibria in this sequential-move pricing game.…
1 Consider a duopoly with firm 1 and firm 2. Their cost functions are 2q₁ and cq2, respectively, where 2 < c < 10. The market demand function is p=10-Q, where Q=q₁+9₂. (a) Assume that the two firms play the Bertrand price game. Find the firms' price choices in the Bertrand equilibrium. (b) Assume that the two firms play the Cournot quantity game. Find the firms' quantity choices in the Cournot equilibrium.
Boulder has several ski and snowboard retailers that sell similar brands. Prices across these retails are relatively stable during preseason (ski/snowboard season) and midseason, but become volatile postseason. For the past few years, when one retailer slashed prices (especially postseason), other retailers followed suit. All retailers behave as oligopolists. Suppose that retailer A faces an inverse demand of p = 1,500 – 1.5Q, when the other retailers match retailer A’s price changes, and p=1200 – 0.7Q, when the other retailers don't match retailer A’s price changes. Suppose also that retailer A's cost function is C(Q) = 20,000 + 10Q + 0.8Q2. Question: Under these conditions, what is the most profit retailer A can make?
Question 2 (Choices Involving Strategy): Suppose there are two competing Gyms in a local town. Each gym is individually owned and has three pricing levels to choose from: Low, Medium and High (PL,PM, and PH). Consider the table below as the outcomes for each combination of strategies (they are yearly profits in the thousands). Can you predict the outcome using ONLY iteratively dominated strategies? Why or why not? Find the Nash Equilibrium(a) using best responses. Is this the best outcome? Now, suppose that there was a sudden increase in the cost of equipment that meant the low price was no longer viable, and both choosing the medium price level meant only 50 (thousand) profit for each gym. Nothing else changes. What is the pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of this new game? Gym 1 is on the left and Gym 2 is on the top. The first number inside every box is Gym 1's profit and the second (after the comma) is Gym 2's profit. (10 Marks) PL PMPH PL 125, 125 200, 75 375,50 PM 75, 250…
Two firms operating in the same market must decide between charging a high price or a low price. The Payoffs are as below. Firm A's profit is listed before the comma, B's profit after the comma. Firm B Firm A Low Price High Price Low Price 16, 17 7, 28 High Price 28, 7 22, 22 If each firm tries to choose a price that is optimal, regardless of the other firm's price, what is the Nash equilibrium? Does either firm have a dominant strategy?
Question 3 Assume we have a market with only two companies in it, Company X and Company Y. Now suppose that both companies have to choose one of two potential strategies for pricing their products: setting a low price or setting a high price. The table below shows the expected profits for each company under each pricing scenario. Assume both companies are in competition with each other and seek to maximize their profits. Under these conditions, how much profit should we expect both companies to earn? Company Y Provide your answer below: High Price Low Price High Price Profit for Company Y: $12, 975,000 Profit for Company X: $12, 975,000 Profit for Company Y: $16, 218,000 Profit for Company X: $1,946, 000 Company X Low Price Profit for Company Y: $1,946, 000 Profit for Company X: $16, 218,000 Profit for Company Y: $6,487,000 Profit for Company X: $6,487,000
Two firms produce differentiated products. Firm 1 faces the demand curve Q1 = 75 -P1 + .5P2. (Note that a lower competing price robs the firm of some, but not all, sales. Thus, price competition is not as extreme as in the Bertrand model.) Firm 2 faces the analogous demand curve Q2 = 75 -P2 +.5P1. For each firm, AC =MC = 30. suppose that firm 2 acts as a price leader and can commit in advance to setting its price once and for all. In turn, firm 1 will react to firm 2’s price, according to the profit-maximizing response found earlier, P1 = 52.5 + .25P2. In committing to a price, firm 2 is contemplating either a price increase to P2 = $73 or a price cut to P2 =$67. Which price constitutes firm 2’s optimal commitment strategy? Justify your answer and explain why it makes sense.
Consider a duopoly market, where two firms sell differentiated products, which are imperfect substitutes. The market can be modelled as a static price competition game, similar to a linear city model. The two firms choose prices p, and p2 simultaneously. The derived demand functions for the two firms are: D1 (P1, P2) = SG+P1)and D2 (P1, P2)= S(;+-P2), where S > 0 and the parameter t > 0 measures the 2t 2t degree of product differentiation. Both firms have constant marginal cost c> 0 for production. (a) Derive the Nash equilibrium of this game, including the prices, outputs and profit of the two firms. (b) From the demand functions, qi= D¡ (p; , p¡ )= SG+P), derive the residual inverse demand functions: p; = P; (qi , p¡) (work out: P; (qi , P;)). Show that for t > 0, P;(qi , P;) is downward 2t aPi (qi ,Pj) . sloping, i.e., c, i.e., firm į has market power. %3D (c) Calculate the limits of the equilibrium prices and profit as t → 0 ? What is P; (qi , p;) as t → 0? Is it downward sloping?…
QUESTION 13 Consider a market where two firms (1 and 2) produce differentiated goods and compete in prices. The demand for firm 1 is given by D₁(P₁, P2) = 140 - 2p1 + P2 and demand for firm 2's product is D2 (P1, P2) 140 - 2p2 + P1 Both firms have a constant marginal cost of 20. What is the Nash equilibrium price of firm 1? (Only give a full number; if necessary, round to the lower integer; no dollar sign.)
Consider two firms choosing quantities sequentially in a duopoly setting (i.e. the Stackelberg game). The two firms have identical products. Each firm has no fixed costs, and faces marginal costs equal to 5 plus the quantity it produces (i.e. MC = 5 + q). Market demand is given by Q = 46 - P, where Q is market quantity and P is market price. In equilibrium, how much will the firm that moves first produce?
Consider the following oligopolistic market. In the first stage, Firm 1 chooses quantity q1₁. Firms 2 and 3 observe Firm 1's choice, and then proceed to simultaneously choose 92 and 93, respectively. Market demand is given by p(Q) = 100 – · Q, and Q = 9₁ +92 +93. Firm 1's costs are c₁ (9₁) = 591, firm 2's costs are c₂ (92) = 492 and firm 3's costs are C3 (93) = 493. C2 Starting from the end of the game, you can express Firm 2's best response function in terms of 9₁ and 93, and you can similarly express Firm 3's best response function in terms of 9₁ and 92. Using these, answer the following questions. If rounding is needed, write your answers to 3 decimal places. a) If Firm 1 chooses q₁ = 3, what quantity will Firm 2 choose? b) If Firm 1 chooses 9₁ = 100, what quantity will Firm 2 choose? c) In the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game, firm 1 produces what quantity? d) In the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game, firm 2 and firm 3 each produce what quantity?
Consider duopoly model with firm 1 and firm 2. Firms have constant marginal costs, c_1 = c_2 = 10. Demand functions are given by equations: Q_1= (7*100) - 2*P_1 + P_2 Q_2 = (7*100) + P_1 - 2*P_ 2 Note that * signifies the multiplication sign. Assume that firm 1 chooses its price first. Then, after observing firm 1’s price, firm 2 chooses its price. Find the prices each firm chooses in the roll-back equilibrium of this game. Is it good to be a leader or a follower in this game? Why?