Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
The article "Time Series Analysis for Construction Productivity Experiments" (T. Abdelhamid and J. Everett, Journal of Construction Engineering and" Management, 1999:87–95) presents a study comparing the effectiveness of a video system that allows a crane operator to see the lifting point while operating the crane with the old system in which the operator relies on hand signals from a tagman. Three different lifts, A, B, and C, were studied. Lift A was of little difficulty, lift B was of moderate difficulty, and lift C was of high difficulty. Each lift was performed several times, both with the new video system and with the old tagman system. The time (in seconds) required to perform each lift was recorded. The following tables present the means, standard deviations, and sample sizes. Low Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 47.79 2.19 14 Video 47.15 2.65 40 Moderate Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 69.33 6.26 12 Video 58.50 5.59 24 High Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 109.71 17.02 17 Video 84.52 13.51 29 Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of low difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of moderate difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of high difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. a. b. C.

The article "Time Series Analysis for Construction Productivity Experiments" (T. Abdelhamid and J. Everett, Journal of Construction Engineering and" Management, 1999:87–95) presents a study comparing the effectiveness of a video system that allows a crane operator to see the lifting point while operating the crane with the old system in which the operator relies on hand signals from a tagman. Three different lifts, A, B, and C, were studied. Lift A was of little difficulty, lift B was of moderate difficulty, and lift C was of high difficulty. Each lift was performed several times, both with the new video system and with the old tagman system. The time (in seconds) required to perform each lift was recorded. The following tables present the means, standard deviations, and sample sizes. Low Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 47.79 2.19 14 Video 47.15 2.65 40 Moderate Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 69.33 6.26 12 Video 58.50 5.59 24 High Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 109.71 17.02 17 Video 84.52 13.51 29 Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of low difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of moderate difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of high difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. a. b. C.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
The article "Time Series Analysis for Construction Productivity Experiments" (T. Abdelhamid and J. Everett, Journal of Construction Engineering and" Management, 1999:87–95) presents a study comparing the effectiveness of a video system that allows a crane operator to see the lifting point while operating the crane with the old system in which the operator relies on hand signals from a tagman. Three different lifts, A, B, and C, were studied. Lift A was of little difficulty, lift B was of moderate difficulty, and lift C was of high difficulty. Each lift was performed several times, both with the new video system and with the old tagman system. The time (in seconds) required to perform each lift was recorded. The following tables present the means, standard deviations, and sample sizes. Low Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 47.79 2.19 14 Video 47.15 2.65 40 Moderate Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 69.33 6.26 12 Video 58.50 5.59 24 High Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 109.71 17.02 17 Video 84.52 13.51 29 Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of low difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of moderate difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of high difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. a. b. C.
Transcribed Image Text:The article "Time Series Analysis for Construction Productivity Experiments" (T. Abdelhamid and J. Everett, Journal of Construction Engineering and" Management, 1999:87–95) presents a study comparing the effectiveness of a video system that allows a crane operator to see the lifting point while operating the crane with the old system in which the operator relies on hand signals from a tagman. Three different lifts, A, B, and C, were studied. Lift A was of little difficulty, lift B was of moderate difficulty, and lift C was of high difficulty. Each lift was performed several times, both with the new video system and with the old tagman system. The time (in seconds) required to perform each lift was recorded. The following tables present the means, standard deviations, and sample sizes. Low Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 47.79 2.19 14 Video 47.15 2.65 40 Moderate Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 69.33 6.26 12 Video 58.50 5.59 24 High Difficulty Mean Standard Deviation Sample Size Tagman 109.71 17.02 17 Video 84.52 13.51 29 Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of low difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of moderate difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. Can you conclude that the mean time to perform a lift of high difficulty is less when using the video system than when using the tagman system? Explain. a. b. C.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 6 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS