Suppose rules of the scenario change such that Village1 and Village2 are having a conflict on the ownership of this stream of nearby river. If both villages decide not to battle against each other, V1 will receive a monetary gain of 20S while V2 will receive a monetary gain of 50$. However, if both decide to battle, there is no monetary gain for both. If V1 decides to attach V2 but V2 stays neutral, V1 receives a gain of 80$ while V2 gets 60S. V2 will get 80S if it attacks V1 and in return V1 does not attack. In this scenario, Vl's monetary gain would be just 10s. You are required to construct the pay-off matrix of this scenario.

Suppose rules of the scenario change such that Village1 and Village2 are having a conflict on the ownership of this stream of nearby river. If both villages decide not to battle against each other, V1 will receive a monetary gain of 20S while V2 will receive a monetary gain of 50$. However, if both decide to battle, there is no monetary gain for both. If V1 decides to attach V2 but V2 stays neutral, V1 receives a gain of 80$ while V2 gets 60S. V2 will get 80S if it attacks V1 and in return V1 does not attack. In this scenario, Vl's monetary gain would be just 10s. You are required to construct the pay-off matrix of this scenario.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Taylor, Faith, Jay, and Jessica are college roommates. They're trying to decide where the four of them should go for spring break: Orlando or Las Vegas. If they order the tickets by 11:00 PM on February 1, the cost will be just $500 per person. If they miss that deadline, the cost rises to $1,200 per person. The following table shows the benefit (in dollar terms) that each roommate would get from the two trips. Roommate Taylor Benefit from Orlando Benefit from Las Vegas Faith $1,250 $800 $550 $800 Jay Jessica $650 $600 $850 $1,050 The roommates tend to put off making decisions. So, when February 1 rolls around and they still haven't made a decision, they schedule a vote for 10:00 PM that night. In case of a tie, they will flip a coin between the two vacation destinations. The roommates will get the most total benefit if they choose to go to Given the individual benefits each roommate receives from the two trips, which trip will each roommate vote for? Fill in the table with each…
Does this game have a prisoner’s dilemma flavor? That is, could the n firms do better by jointly choosing their individual output? If so, which individual farmer’s quantity would maximize their joint profits? Why would one need a binding contract to enforce this agreement?
8.8
Mr. and Mrs. Ward typically vote oppositely in elections and so their votes “cancel each other out.” They each gain two units of utility from a vote for their positions (and lose two units of utility from a vote against their positions). However, the bother of actually voting costs each one unit of utility. Diagram a game in which they choose whether to vote or not to vote.
Two firms are competing to establish one of two new wireless communication standards, A or B. A strategy is a choice of standard, and an outcome of this game is a choice of standard by each firm – for example, (A, B) represents the case where Firm 1 decides to develop standard A and Firm 2 develops standard B. Here, the first letter will always correspond to Firm 1’s decision, and the second letter to Firm 2’s decision. Firm 1 has the following preferences over outcomes, in order of highest to lowest preferred: it prefers (A, A) to (B, A) to (A, B) to (B, B). Firm 2 prefers (A, B) to (A, A) to (B, A) to (B, B). Suppose that firms simultaneously decide which standard to develop. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium?
(The Beckhams' dilemma) Victoria and David are husband and wife. They both prefer ciean to dirty house but neither likes to clean the house. Their payoffs are given in the table below. Victoria Clean Don't clean 0,8 Clean 5,5 David Don't clean 8,0 1,1 a) Let say they play the clean house game only once, what is the Nash equilibrium? b) Let say Victoria and David has to decide whether to clean or not every day for indefinite number of days. How grim-trigger strategy will be our subgame perfect Nash equilibrium? In other words, what is the patience rate that ensure Victoria and David maintain the cleanliness of the house?
the Consider a simultaneous-move integer game between two players: Marilyn and Noah. Each of player is required to announce a positive integer between 1 to 4. In other words, a player can announce 1, 2, 3, or 4. Two players announce their integers simultaneously. Notice that this game is different from the games we learned in class in that each player has four actions to take. The payoffs of the players in the game are specified as follows: (1) when the two announced integers are different, whoever reports the lower number pays $1 to the other player, so that the loser of the game has payoff -1 and the winner of the game has payoff 1; (2) when the two players announce the same integer, their payoffs are both O. What is Marilyn's maximin strategy? 01 02 03 O
Suppose a $1 bill is to be divided between two players according to a simultaneous-move, one-shot bargaining game. Is there a Nash equilibrium to the bargaining game if the smallest unit in which the money can be divided is $0.01? Assume that if the players ask for more in total than is available, they go home empty-handed.
Speedy Bike's Advertising Power Bike's Advertising Budget Large Budget Small Large Small A $20 B $18 $20 с $35 $18 $35 D $25 $25 Refer to the payoff matrix. Suppose that Speedy Bike and Power Bike are the only two bicycle manufacturing firms serving the market. Both can choose large or small advertising budgets. If this is a one-time, simultaneous game, which cell represents the final outcome we would expect to occur?
Based on the game depicted in the matrix below, which of the following is true: Player 1 U M D L 4,3 3,2 5,0 Player 2 C 6,0 8,4 9,3 R 6,2 3,6 7,4 OD is a dominant strategy for Player 1 OR is a dominant strategy for Player 2 OL is a dominated strategy for Player 2 O (D,C) is the Nash Equilibrium of the game because it has the highest combined payoff O All of the above