Make sure you clearly write your name andsubmission:.1. Consider the 2-player, zero-sum game "Rock, Paper, Scissors". Each player choosesone of 3 strategies: rock, paper, or scissors. Then, both players reveal their choices.The outcome is determined as follows. If both players choose the same strategy,neither player wins or loses anything. Otherwise:• "paper covers rock": if one player chooses paper and the other chooses rock,the player who chose paper wins and is paid 1 by the other player.• "scissors cut paper": if one player chooses scissors and the other chooses paper,the player who chose scissors wins and is paid 1 by the other player.• "rock breaks scissors": if one player chooses rock and the other player choosesscissors, the player who chose rock wins and is paid 1 by the other player.We can write the payoff matrix for this game as follows:rock paper-101rock0paper1scissors -1(a) Show that this game does not have a pure Nash equilibrium.1X3(b) Show that the pair of mixed strategies x¹ = (,,) and y¹ = (3) togetherare a Nash equilibrium.10 Coursework Questions.2. Suppose now we alter the game so that whenever Colin chooses "paper" the loserpays the winner 3 instead of 1:scissors1-10rock01rockpaperscissors -1paper scissors1-30-130X(a) Show that x¹ = (3) and y¹ = (3) together are not a Nash equilibriumfor this modified game.MTH5114 (Spring 2023)

*Hi there , as per our guidelines we are solving first question . Kindly re-post the remaining…

1. Consider the 2-player, zero-sum game "Rock, Paper, Scissors". Each player chooses one of 3 strategies: rock, paper, or scissors. Then, both players reveal their choices. The outcome is determined as follows. If both players choose the same strategy, neither player wins or loses anything. Otherwise: • "paper covers rock": if one player chooses paper and the other chooses rock, the player who chose paper wins and is paid 1 by the other player. • "scissors cut paper": if one player chooses scissors and the other chooses paper, the player who chose scissors wins and is paid 1 by the other player. plr brooks coiccors" if one player chooses rock and the other player chooses

1. Consider the 2-player, zero-sum game "Rock, Paper, Scissors". Each player chooses one of 3 strategies: rock, paper, or scissors. Then, both players reveal their choices. The outcome is determined as follows. If both players choose the same strategy, neither player wins or loses anything. Otherwise: • "paper covers rock": if one player chooses paper and the other chooses rock, the player who chose paper wins and is paid 1 by the other player. • "scissors cut paper": if one player chooses scissors and the other chooses paper, the player who chose scissors wins and is paid 1 by the other player. plr brooks coiccors" if one player chooses rock and the other player chooses

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Use the following payoff matrix for a simultaneous-move one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. Player 2 Strategy C D E F Player 1 A 9, 8 14, 14 18, 25 12, 19 B 23, 13 10, 18 14, 26 19, 21 a. What is player 1’s optimal strategy? multiple choice Strategy B Strategy A Player 1 does not have an optimal strategy. b. Determine player 1’s equilibrium payoff. Prev
2. Consider the two-player strategic form game represented in the following payoff table: t 1 m b 7,2 1,2 3,7 2 M 2,4 3,4 1,6 R 1,3 7,1 4,2 Player 1 chooses between rows, S₁ = {t, m, b), and receives the first listed payoff in each cell. Player 2 chooses between columns, S₂ = {L, M, R), and receives the second listed payoff in each cell. a. Does either player have a strictly dominant strategy? Explain. b. Explaining your steps carefully, identify the set of rationalizable strategies in this game. c. Making sure to explain your solution method, solve for all pure strategy Nash equilibria in this game.
2. Consider the following "centipede game." The game starts with player 1 choosing be- tween terminate (T) and continue (C). If player 1 chooses C, the game proceeds with player 2 choosing between terminate (t) and continue (c). The two players choose be- tween terminate and continue in turn if the other player chooses continue until the terminal nodes with (player l's payoff, player 2's payoff) are reached as shown below. TTTT Player 1 Player 2 Player 1 Player 2 (3, 3) t (1, 1) (0, 3) (2, 2) (1, 4) (a) List all possible strategies of each player. (b) Transform the game tree into a normal-form matrix representation. (c) Find all pure-strategy Nash equilibria. (d) Find the unique pure-strategy subgame-perfect equilibrium.
Consider the following two player game. In each cell the first number refers to the payoff to Player 1 while the second number refers to the payoff to Player 2. Suppose the two players move simultaneously (at the same time). Which one of the following statements is CORRECT? Player #1 Player #2 Top Bottom Left 7.7 4.0 Right 0,4 4,4 O There are three equilibria in this game: two pure strategy equilibria at [Top, Left] and [Bottom, Right) and al third equilibrium in mixed strategies. In the mixed strategy equilibrium of this game. Player 1 should play Top with probability 2/5 and Bottom with probability 3/5; Player 2 should play Left with probability 2/5 and Right with probability 3/5. O There are three equilibria in this game; two pure strategy equilibria at (Top. Left) and (Bottom, Right) and a third equilibrium in mixed strategies. In the mixed strategy equilibrium of this game, both players should randomize over the strategies with probability and %. O There is a unique dominant…
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Gabriel and Nia are playing a game that requires both to simultaneously choose an action: Up or Down. The payoff matrix that follows shows the earnings of each person as a function of both of their choices. For example, the upper-right cell shows that if Gabriel chooses Up and Nia chooses Down, Gabriel will receive a payoff of 6 and Nia will receive a payoff of 4. Gabriel Up Down Up 6,3 3,3 Nia Down 6, 4 7,4 In this game, the only dominant strategy is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Gabriel chooses and Nia chooses
4
1. Consider a game of chicken: two players approach a narrow bridge with room only for one, and each chooses either to go through and hope the other guy backs off (call this action H, for "hawk"), or backs off to let the other go through (call this action D, for "dove"). If both players are normal, then each gets a payoff of -1 from a collision (i.e. if both choose H), 1 if they choose H against D, 0 if they choose D (regardless of what the other player chooses). Now perturb the game as follows: there is a chance p > 0 that P2 is a “violent type", who gets 1 from playing H regardless of Pl's action, and -1 from playing D, again regardless of P1's action. (a) Illustrate the game tree corresponding to the Harsanyi transformation of this game (i.e. the dynamic game of imperfect information in which nature moves first). (b) Illustrate the extended game (i.e. the normal form game corresponding to your game tree in part (a)). (c) Find all values of p for which there is a BNE in which P1…
Consider the following game:
5. Consider a game with the following payoff table for player 1: Strategy Player 1 1 11 2 3 1 3 -4 1 Player 2 2 -3 -2 3 3 -2 −1 2 (a) Use Excel Solver to find the optimal mixed strategy for each player.