Question 1: The following is the game of fighting entry. A new firm, referred to as the entrant, has to decide whether to enter the market or not. An established firm, referred to as firm 1, has then to decide given the actions of the new firm whether to lower the price (and hence fight the entrant) or keep its price high. The payoffs to each are shown below Entrant Enter Do not Enter a. Represent the game in extensive form. b. High price 60, 60 0, 100 Firm 1 Low price 0,0 0,0 Find the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium c. What can you say about the potential for firm 1 to fight the entrant? Firm 1 threatens to lower price if the entrant enters. What do you think of this threat?

Question 1: The following is the game of fighting entry. A new firm, referred to as the entrant, has to decide whether to enter the market or not. An established firm, referred to as firm 1, has then to decide given the actions of the new firm whether to lower the price (and hence fight the entrant) or keep its price high. The payoffs to each are shown below Entrant Enter Do not Enter a. Represent the game in extensive form. b. High price 60, 60 0, 100 Firm 1 Low price 0,0 0,0 Find the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium c. What can you say about the potential for firm 1 to fight the entrant? Firm 1 threatens to lower price if the entrant enters. What do you think of this threat?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

6)Game Theory: The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Assume that the Wilson and Spalding athletic equipment companies are in a one-shot game for market share and profits, but that they have the option of choosing only one of two possible price strategies for basketballs: $20 or $80. Obviously if they choose different strategies, the firm with the lower price will win the entire market. The firms face the following payoff matrix (See Chap. 10). Wilson\ \Spalding Wilson $ 20 Price Wilson $ 80 Price Spalding $ 20 Price $ 400, $ 400 $ 1500, $ 0 Spalding $ 80 Price $ 0, $ 1500 $ 1000, $ 1000 What strategy will each firm choose? Why? Which strategy is dominant? Which strategy is preferred by each firm? What will be the outcome of the one-shot game? Where is the Nash equilibrium? Which outcome would be best for the two firms? What will happen if the game is repeated an infinite number of times?
Question 2 (Choices Involving Strategy): Suppose there are two competing Gyms in a local town. Each gym is individually owned and has three pricing levels to choose from: Low, Medium and High (PL,PM, and PH). Consider the table below as the outcomes for each combination of strategies (they are yearly profits in the thousands). Can you predict the outcome using ONLY iteratively dominated strategies? Why or why not? Find the Nash Equilibrium(a) using best responses. Is this the best outcome? Now, suppose that there was a sudden increase in the cost of equipment that meant the low price was no longer viable, and both choosing the medium price level meant only 50 (thousand) profit for each gym. Nothing else changes. What is the pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of this new game? Gym 1 is on the left and Gym 2 is on the top. The first number inside every box is Gym 1's profit and the second (after the comma) is Gym 2's profit. (10 Marks) PL PMPH PL 125, 125 200, 75 375,50 PM 75, 250…
2A
QUESTION 12 This is a HOT SPOT question. You will need to evaluate the picture of the game below, and answer the question by clicking on a specific area (the hot spot) of the picture. Question: Are there any dominant strategies in this game? If there are, click on the box that corresponds to that dominant strategy (either UP, DOWN, LEFT, or RIGHT). If there aren't any anywhere outside of these boxes. If there are dominant strategies for both players, clicking on only one of them will suffice. Player 1 Player 2 Selected Coordinates Clear UP DOWN LEFT 45, 80 70, 100 RIGHT 50, 150 60, 60
Two rival companies competing in the same market need to decide their plans for future expansion of their stores. The Table below shows the possible outcomes of their mutually interdependent actions (payoffs are profits in £m) Giga Company Titanic Conglomerate No Change Refurbishment of existing stores Large Expansion No Change 30, 40 25, 35 15, 24 Refurbishment of existing stores 35, 30 28, 32 18, 33 Large Expansion 12, 22 18, 20 20, 25 The Nash equilibrium: (A) does not exist. (B) occurs when both firms choose Refurbishment of existing stores. (C) occurs when both firms choose Large Expansion. (D) occurs when both firms choose No Change.
QUESTION 13 Consider a market where two firms (1 and 2) produce differentiated goods and compete in prices. The demand for firm 1 is given by D₁(P₁, P2) = 140 - 2p1 + P2 and demand for firm 2's product is D2 (P1, P2) 140 - 2p2 + P1 Both firms have a constant marginal cost of 20. What is the Nash equilibrium price of firm 1? (Only give a full number; if necessary, round to the lower integer; no dollar sign.)
AP CollegeBoard Test Booklet Unit 4 Problem Set Include correctly labeled diagrams, if useful or required, in explaining your answers. A correctly labeled diagram must have all axes and curves clearly labeled and must show directional changes. If the question prompts you to “Calculate," you must show how you arrived at your final answer. Use the graph provided below to answer parts (a)-(e). Marginal Cost Average Total Cost Average Variable Cost 108 100 55 Demand 0 10 21 31 44 57 77 Quantity Marginal Revenue BigMed, a profit-maximizing firm, has a patent on a medical device, making it the only producer of that device. The graph above shows BigMed's demand, marginal revenue, average total cost, average variable cost, and marginal cost curves. (a) Calculate BigMed's total revenue if the firm produces the allocatively efficient quantity. Show your work. (b) Starting at a price of $100, if BigMed were to increase the price by 2%, will the quantity demanded decrease by more than 2%, by less…
Problem # 4 Idea Inc. is a small publishing company operating in the college and textbook market, which is one of the most profitable segments for book publishers. Idea Inc. has a cost of producing, handling, and shipping of about $30 for each additional book. The publisher’s overall marketing and promotion spending (set annually) accounts for an average cost of about $10 per book. Idea Inc.’s best-selling game theory text has a demand curve: P = 200 - Q, where Q denotes yearly sales (in thousands) of books. For this text Idea Inc. pays a $10 per book royalty to the author. a) Determine the profit-maximizing output and price for the game theory text. b) A rival publisher has raised the price of its best-selling game theory text by $20. One option is to exactly match this price hike and so exactly preserve your level of sales. Do you endorse this price increase? (Explain briefly why or why not.) c) To save significantly on fixed costs, Idea Inc. plans to contract out the actual printing…
40
Question 3. Consider the following game, and calculate the following: Player 2 X | Y | Z A 1, 3 1,7 5, 2 B 2, 2 -3, 5 2,0 C 5, -4 6, 0 9,-1 Player 1 Q3)a) All Dominance Relations: Q3)b) Strictly Dominated Strategies: Q3)c) Strictly Dominant Strategies: Q3)d) Rational Outcome: ....