Q.1.3 Vusi is an avid collector of comic books. Whilst browsing online, he gets into contact with a supplier of rare comic books. He agrees to purchase a particular comic book, but it is imperative that it is Potato Man Vol. 6 of 1983. He also states that he will pay R1 000 for the comic book, provided it arrives in mint condition; failing which, he will send the comic book back and search elsewhere. Identify the two clauses present in this scenario. Explain what they are and why they are present.

Q.1.3 Vusi is an avid collector of comic books. Whilst browsing online, he gets into contact with a supplier of rare comic books. He agrees to purchase a particular comic book, but it is imperative that it is Potato Man Vol. 6 of 1983. He also states that he will pay R1 000 for the comic book, provided it arrives in mint condition; failing which, he will send the comic book back and search elsewhere. Identify the two clauses present in this scenario. Explain what they are and why they are present.

Similar questions

Buyer Bert can't believe that Seller Sam has had a last-second change of heart about entering into an agreement to sell his home to Bert. Sam has offered to refund Bert's earnest money and even pay him something in acknowledgment of Bert's inconvenience and disappointment, but Bert's not having it. He wants Sam's house. Choose the remedy for breach of trust that Bert will most likely take. demand specific performance initiate rescission accept compensatory damages settle for liquidated damages
Requirements that are needed for another country and foreign enforceable contract in protecting business interests
Should FedEx be liable for the alleged loss of valuable rare coins when FedEx did not know what the package contained. Rykard v. FedEx Ground Package System.
Fiona, Celine and Donna have recently commenced a business together making custard pies using the name 'FCD's Custard Pies' as their trading name. They also sell coffee and soft drinks. Only Donna has put capital into the business, and no formal agreement exists between them. However, on many occasions Fiona has purchased stock for the business from their various suppliers by using her own money, and she has also set up an account with the suppliers in the name of 'FCD's Custard Pies'. Celine also has often placed orders on behalf of the business with their various suppliers for stock. 00:0 At their next meeting Fiona suggests selling alcoholic beverages. Donna likes the idea, but Celine does not. Celine says that such a change would require renovation of the shop, and also obtaining a licence to sell alcohol. This requires an application to the relevant government authority, which may reject the application. After giving it lots of thought, Donna decides to leave the business in two…
13. Sam Fraser, 24 years of age and single, possesses a two-year-old vehicle which he drives to work (a distance of 7(1/2) miles, full circle). He keeps the vehicle in 03 region, and has had one auto crash during the previous three years. What amount would Sam save money on a mix of $100-deductible impact and thorough inclusion on the off chance that he drove a vehicle delegated image 1 instead of as image 5? We don't know whether Sam has had driver preparing.
Accounting Ethics Case: Andy Frame and his supervisor are sent on an out-of-town assignment by their employer. At the supervisor’s suggestion, they stay at the Spartan Inn, across the street from the Luxury Inn. After three days of work, they settle their lodging bills and leave. On the return trip, the supervisor gives Andy what appears to be a copy of a receipt from the Luxury Inn for three nights of lodging. Actually, the supervisor indicates that he prepared the Luxury Inn receipt on his office computer and plans to complete his expense reimbursement request using the higher lodging costs from the Luxury Inn.Required: What are the ethical considerations that Andy faces when he prepares his expense reimbursement request and how often do you think this happens in the real world? Your post should be at least a couple of paragraphs.
QUESTION 5 The ACCC wrote a media release which made the following claim: "To use Calvary medical facilities, a medical practitioner enters into a contract with Calvary granting them rights to use Calvary medical facilities. In March 2011, Calvary introduced a new set of by-laws that governed the conduct of medical practitioners who wish to use Calvary's medical facilities. The by-laws included provisions that allowed Calvary to refuse to grant, or to revoke, the right of a medical practitioner to use its facilities if the medical practitioner had become involved in the operation of a business in competition with Calvary." What is the name of the practice that the ACCC is alleging here? O Exclusionary Conduct O Predatory Pricing O Excessive Pricing O Collusion
Andrews ordered 20 round tables to seat parties of two, 25 square tables to seat parties of four, 5 tables to seat larger parties and 175 chairs. The tables were specially ordered to contain the logo of the restaurant on the top of each table. Andrews paid for the entire shipment when placing the order; however, the supplier was responsible for making the shipping arrangements. The tables and chairs arrived three weeks later; however, five were scratched and damaged. Seven of the chairs were missing. Analyze the restaurant’s options related to the damaged tables and missing chairs. Be sure to address the applicability of the UCC to the transaction.
Amanda and Emilia are co-directors and members of Griffin Pty Ltd, which imports widgets from Vietnam and sells them in various hardware stores in regional NSW. Griffin has a medium-sized warehouse where it stocks goods, and from which it distributes products. Griffin recently signed a contract to supply a large hardware store in Orange and Dubbo with widgets. So the company ordered 10 pallets of widgets from its Vietnamese supplier and also paid a substantial deposit. A shipping company who carries goods into Australia has already brought the pallets into the country and has sent their bill to Griffin. After a couple of deliveries to the hardware store, a safety issue is discovered with the widgets and the government bans the sale of the widgets. the hardware store cancels all further orders of the widgets. Now, Griffin has no future revenue and its remaining stock of widgets cannot be sold. The shipping company is demanding payment of its invoice; there are also several…
Which of the following actos covered under a Personal Auks poley WOU al or of INGICE WREST OA An auto that is covered by a pelle se tare si se to see the interesting them on occident An auto that is inoked in an accidentting in damage that esessed the state accident repeating threshold An auto that is insured by a company which at the time of an accidente delaying syment of another com under the poly An auto whose owner has het teda proof of thancial responsibility after an accident
4. Get well Company carried out advertisements about their product in India in February, 2020 to provide safety from a pandemic. They claimed that any person who took the right dosage of medicine in the prescribed manner (i.e., two times daily for one month) will not catch flu. In case someone does, the company promised to pay a compensation of $ 25 to them immediately. To show their sincerity regarding this offer, the company deposited a sum of $ 500 in a public bank. Raja bought the medicine and used it as prescribed in the advertisement, but still ended up catching the flu. He approached the company for recovery of the amount promised in the advertisement. The company denied the payment. Which topic has been covered in this scenario?
Darren goes to a monster truck rally. Before going to the rally, he does not read the back of his ticket, which states "Monster truck rallies are extremely loud and noisy. Ear protection is highly recommended. By purchasing this ticket, the bearer of the ticket has expressly assumed any and all risk of ear injury associated with attending this event." Darren, not having read the back of the ticket, does not bring earplugs or other protective ear equipment to the rally. After the rally, he has constant ringing in his ears and cannot clearly hear people talk to him. Did Darren expressly assume the risk of ear injury? What about impliedly? Why or why not?