QUESTION 5The ACCC wrote a media release which made the following claim:"To use Calvary medical facilities, a medical practitioner enters into a contract with Calvary granting them rights to use Calvary medical facilities.In March 2011, Calvary introduced a new set of by-laws that governed the conduct of medical practitioners who wish to use Calvary's medicalfacilities. The by-laws included provisions that allowed Calvary to refuse to grant, or to revoke, the right of a medical practitioner to use itsfacilities if the medical practitioner had become involved in the operation of a business in competition with Calvary."What is the name of the practice that the ACCC is alleging here?O Exclusionary ConductO Predatory PricingO Excessive PricingO Collusion

Competition laws refers to the groups of laws and regulations that aim to provent anti competitive…

Answered: The ACCC wrote a media release which…

Similar questions

Bishop Logging Company is a large, family-owned logging contractor formed in the Lowcountry of South Carolina. Bishop Logging has traditionally harvested pine timber. However, Bishop Logging began investigating the feasibility of a fully mechanized hardwood swamp logging operation when its main customer, Stone Container Corporation, decided to expand hardwood production. In anticipating an increased demand for hardwood in conjunction with the operation of a new paper machine, Stone Container requested that Bishop Logging harvest and supply hardwood for processing at its mill. In South Carolina, most suitable hardwood is located deep in the swamplands. Because of the high accident risk in the swamp, Bishop Logging did not want to harvest hardwood by the conventional method of manual felling of trees. Because Bishop Logging had already been successful in its totally mechanized pine logging operation, it began a search for improved methods of hardwood swamp logging centered on mechanizing…
Describe the cause of action claimed by the Plaintiffs in their petition. Kelo v. New london
The state of Alabama enacted a statute that imposed a tax on premiums earned by insurance companies. The statute imposed a 1 percent tax on domestic insurance companies (i.e., insurance companies that were incorporated in Alabama and had their principal office in the state). The statute imposed a 4 percent tax on the premiums earned by out-of-state insurance companies that sold insurance in Alabama. Out-of-state insurance companies could reduce the premium tax by 1 percent by investing at least 10 percent of their assets in Alabama. Domestic insurance companies did not have to invest any of their assets in Alabama. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, an out-of-state insurance company, sued the state of Alabama, alleging that the Alabama statute violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Who wins and why? Explain your answer.
Jackson is a car purchasing agent for Highway Motors, a used car dealer. Jackson attends wholesale auto auctions and notices that some autos have consistently greater demand and higher prices. Jackson forms a car purchasing partnership with Viva Inc. to buy these cars from "for sale by owner" advertisements and then sell them in Viva's name at the auto auctions where Jackson purchases them for Highway. Discuss if Jackson has violated any duty he owes Highway Motors.
When OTES developed its first online application for university math courses, BD sued both OES and Gone. BD contends that Gone has breached his covenant not to compete, because he is engaging in a competitive business in online learning resources in university-level math and science and that he has proprietary information regarding the development of science and math tutorial programs. BD further contends that OTES is engaging in tortious interference with contract. BD is Gone and OTES deny the claims, and state that Gone has not violated his employment agreement, because they are not engaging in a competitive business with BD. The law in Georgia was recently amended to include the following provisions: A covenant not to compete must be reasonable in terms of time, geographical area, and prohibited activities. A time period longer than 2 years is presumed to be unenforceable. The courts are permitted to blue-pencil (or reform) covenants that are otherwise unenforceable.…
The Alberta Motor Association (the Payor) carried on a business of training and providing instruction to individuals who wanted to obtain vehicle operator’s licences. Mr. Bourne (the Appellant) had an arrangement with the Payor to provide such instruction. The Payor had treated Mr. Bourne as an independent contractor from 2018 to 2020. Mr. Bourne was claiming that he was an employee of the Alberta Motor Association in 2020. Should Mr. Bourne be viewed as an employee of the Alberta Motor Association or, alternatively, an independent contractor? List all of the factors that should be considered in reaching a conclusion. The facts in this case are as follows:• the Payor operated as a membership based association; (admitted)• the Payor had clients who wanted to obtain motor vehicle operator’s licences; (admitted)• the Appellant was hired as a driving instructor; (admitted)• the Appellant entered into a written contract with the Payor stating that the Appellant was a contractor and not an…
A pediatrician contracted with Oxford Health Plans to provide care for Oxford members at specified rates. The pediatrician later filed suit in state court against Oxford on behalf of himself "and a proposed class of other physicians," alleging that Oxford had not made proper payment to them. Oxford moved to compel arbitration, relying on a contractual clause that provided: "No civil action concerning any dispute ... shall be instituted before any court and all such disputes shall be submitted to final and binding arbitration..." The state court granted Oxford's motion and referred the matter to arbitration. Both parties agreed that the arbitrator should decide whether their contract authorized class arbitration. The arbitrator, relying on the text of the contract, determined that the contract did authorize class arbitration. Oxford then filed a motion in federal court attempting to vacate the arbitrator's decision on the ground that the arbitrator "exceeded his powers" under Section…
A. 1. X, Y, and Z, co-owners, sold a inverter air-condition unit to A. They solidarity bound themselves to deliver the aircon unit in March 30. Through the fault of Y, the aircon unit was completely destroyed . Give the rights and obligations of the parties. B. 1. Joe, Nicolas, and Dante obliged themselves jointly to deliver to Ricky a particular racing horse on April 1. Their agreement which was made known to Ricky is that they will contribute the amount in buying the particular horse. However, the horse was not delivered on the date due because of failure of Nicolas to give his share of the purchase price. State the rights and obligations of the parties. 2. Dindo binds himself to pay his P20,000 loan in four (4) equal monthly installments. Is the obligation of Dindo divisible or indivisible? C. 1. Jaevis promised to deliver to Kyle a breeding cow. Their contract contains a penal clause that in the case of non-fulfillment, Jaevis Shall pay a penalty of P10,000. Jaevis wants to juts…
In eminent domain cases, an individual private party may not benefit from the government's taking of private property for a public purpose. True False
The standard of reivew used by the Connecticut Supreme Court in determining whether the takings were constitutional under the 5th Amendment was: a. The takings were reasonably necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use. b. The takings were substantially necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use. c. There was clear and convincing evidence that the economic benefits of City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass. d. The evidence was beyond a reasonable doubt that the economic benefits of the City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass.
After receiving a promotion to logistics manager, Shantil’s husband, Ashton, purchased a 2017 BMW SUV for $68,000; however, he financed $48,000 through First Florida Banc. The bank took a security interest in the vehicle. Ashton was out of town for work when Shantil found out he had been having an affair. Shantil took a baseball bat and broke the windows and put dents in the BMW. Shantil then dropped the car off at the girlfriend’s apartment. Ashton was furious. After taking the car to a body shop for repairs, Ashton was unable to pay the bill due to the divorce, so he negotiated terms with the body shop; however, the shop retained possession of the vehicle. The repair shop claimed a lien on the car for services and materials in the amount of $21,250. Ashton stopped making payments to the bank while he was trying to save money to pay off the repair. First Florida Banc claimed priority. Discuss the rights of each party and determine which party is in the best position to prevail
Explain and distinguish the reach and effect of the Bill of Rights when originally enacted and after the passage of the due process clause contained in the Fourteenth Amendment.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS