Answered: tients. The state of Arizona brought…

tients. The state of Arizona brought this action against Society and Foundation and its members, alleging price fixing, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Who wins? Explain.

Similar questions

Pls help ASAP
87. who is deemed to be appointed to accept service of process for an insurer in Florida? Governor Insurance commissioner Chief commissioner Attorney General
Sapphire Sapphire PLC (Sapphire) is a listed company on the London Stock Exchange and as such is required to apply the UK Corporate Governance Code (2018). The majority of shares in Sapphire are owned by Bob Diamond who is also the Chief Executive of Sapphire. However, 40% of shares are owned by other investors, including institutional investors. Bob has made no secret of his desire to sell all his shares within the next five years and retire ‘to a desert island’. Sapphire has an audit committee but no other Board level committees as Bob doesn’t consider them necessary to run ‘his company’. He determines the remuneration packages for all the executive directors and senior management including himself. The constitution and membership of a Sapphire’s audit committee is as follows: • Member A – Chair of the Committee who, before retirement two years ago was the Finance Director of the company • Member B – An independent member with no financial experience who joined the committee one year…
Accounting Ethics Case: Andy Frame and his supervisor are sent on an out-of-town assignment by their employer. At the supervisor’s suggestion, they stay at the Spartan Inn, across the street from the Luxury Inn. After three days of work, they settle their lodging bills and leave. On the return trip, the supervisor gives Andy what appears to be a copy of a receipt from the Luxury Inn for three nights of lodging. Actually, the supervisor indicates that he prepared the Luxury Inn receipt on his office computer and plans to complete his expense reimbursement request using the higher lodging costs from the Luxury Inn.Required: What are the ethical considerations that Andy faces when he prepares his expense reimbursement request and how often do you think this happens in the real world? Your post should be at least a couple of paragraphs.
In 1961, Ford Motor Company acquired Autolite, a manufacturer of spark plugs, in order to enter the profitable aftermarket for spark plugs sold as replacement parts. Ford and the other major automobile manufacturers had previously purchased original equipment spark plugs (those installed in new cars when they leave the factory) from independent producers such as Autolite and Champion, either at or below the producer’s cost. The independents were willing to sell original equipment plugs so cheaply because aftermarket mechanics often replace original equipment plugs with the same brand of spark plug. GM had already moved into the spark plug market by developing its own division. Ford decided to do so by means of a vertical merger under which it acquired Autolite. Prior to the Autolite acquisition, Ford bought 10 percent of the total spark plug output. The merger left Champion as the only major independent spark plug producer. Champion’s market share thereafter declined because Chrysler…
Granite Insurance Company entered into a treaty reinsurance agreement with Rock Solid Reinsurance (RSR). Granite's retention limit is $400,000 and RSR agreed to provide reinsurance for up to $2.0 million. If Granite writes an $800,000 policy, RSR is responsible for 50 percent of the losses. If Granite insures a $1.6 million risk, RSR is responsible for 75 percent of any losses. What type of reinsurance arrangement did Granite enter into with RSR? ما A) reinsurance pool B) surplus share reinsurance C) facultative reinsurance D) excess of loss reinsurance
In many states, including New York, an operating agreement is required for a limited liability company to exist. True False
When a corporation wishes to issue certain securities, it must provide sufficient information for an unsophisticated investor to evaluate the financial risk involved. Specifically, the law imposes liability for making a false statement or omission that is "material." What sort of information would an investor consider "material" pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934? Be sure to explain the Act and provide two recent case examples where material representation or omission amounted to securities fraud in violation of SEC Rule 10b-5.
Wiener Haus #82 has been underperforming for a few years. The franchisee (owner of Haus #82) is frustrated and files a claim against the franchisor for breach. The franchisee claims that the agreement he signed contained a statement at the start of the agreement detailing that the business model the franchisor developed was "proven effective and profitable." On these facts, does the franchisee have a winning breach of contract claim against the franchisor? O No, the contract formed was a voidable contract. Thus, the franchisor is void of responsibility if the business model does not produce profit for the franchisee. O Yes, the franchisee relied on these statements when deciding to contract and thus the franchisor should be responsible when the business model fails to work for the franchisee. O No, courts have generally held that the type of language relied upon by the franchisee is "prefatory" and does not create a duty on the part of the franchisor. O Yes, the money paid to the…
Suture Express was a new upstart specializing in the medical supply network by selling only sutures. Owens & Minor was a medical supply distributor that carried all types of medical supplies, including sutures. Owens & Minor began bundling provisions that required its customers to pay a premium for all medical products unless the customer agreed to purchase its sutures. Suture Express brought suit alleging a loss to Owens & Minor through anticompetitive practices. Is this a tying situation that violates federal antitrust laws? Why or why not?
An apartment building in Ithaca, New York with 72 units was financed with a $7.2 million non-recourse first mortgage loan at a 3.6% annual interest rate and an additional $3.6 million fully recourse second mortgage loan at a 7.2% annual interest rate. The owner later borrowed another $720,000 with a fully recourse third mortgage loan at a 10.8% annual interest rate. The borrower ultimately found itself in financial distress and unable to make the monthly mortgage payments on the three outstanding mortgage loans and the property went into foreclosure. What happens to the claims of the second and third mortgage lenders if the foreclosure lawsuit by the first mortgage lender includes all junior mortgage lenders and the property is sold to an unrelated third party for a net price of $6.6 million at the foreclosure sale? a. The mortgage liens of the junior claimants and the loan amounts owed to them are unaffected by the foreclosure sale b. The mortgage liens of the junior claimants are…
Skip and Jack are the shareholders of the Blue Fish Event Corporation. Skip and Jack regularly put on classy events on or near the beach, so they have a special insurance policy to protect their assets. Business has been slow as fewer large beach weddings are taking place, so Skip and Jack use a large fan to blow down and damage most of their décor assets, some of which were personal assets of Skip and Jack, to collect the insurance benefits. (a) Assuming their acts are proven, will a court allow Skip and Jack to recover the insurance money? (b) Is this a situation where the corporate veil may be pierced? Why or why not? (c) What would it mean for Skip and Jack if the corporate veil is pierced in this situation?