Dear Junior Associate I've just finished my meeting with Kevin. He provided us additional information about the events that transpired. Since you are already in this case, I would highly appreciate if you can draft our advice to Kevin, taking into account the additional information he has provided. Here are some notes I managed to take down: Kevin has always understood that the clause on 'Services' is an important term. Although he did not communicate this to Marie on this particular occasion, he pointed out that in a previous equipment hire about three months ago for a wedding event, he told Marie that it is very important that the equipment should be of acceptable quality and fit for the particular purpose disclosed. Marie replied, 'I am your sister. I will never let you down. I guarantee you that my equipment is the best in Australia.' Marie has sent Kevin demand letters, asking him to pay $10000 for the equipment hire, plus the amount for the damaged smoke and fog visual effects. Kevin is willing to pay Marie for the equipment, but he argues that $10000 is way too high, considering what happened. Furthermore, he remembered that Marie has subsequently agreed to a reduction of $1000 for the fees. This was not noted in Annex B of the contract. The only record he has is a Facebook messenger chat (reproduced below): Thanks so much Kevin for supporting my business. This means a lot to me. Please send my love to my niece, Ann. No worries, brother. I can give you less $1000. Will that be okay? No worries, sister. By the way Jane told me that our business is not doing well these days. She told me that we could be in the red. Can you give me a discount? Yes. Thank you, Marie. Looking forward to seeing you this weekend with Mum.

Dear Junior Associate I've just finished my meeting with Kevin. He provided us additional information about the events that transpired. Since you are already in this case, I would highly appreciate if you can draft our advice to Kevin, taking into account the additional information he has provided. Here are some notes I managed to take down: Kevin has always understood that the clause on 'Services' is an important term. Although he did not communicate this to Marie on this particular occasion, he pointed out that in a previous equipment hire about three months ago for a wedding event, he told Marie that it is very important that the equipment should be of acceptable quality and fit for the particular purpose disclosed. Marie replied, 'I am your sister. I will never let you down. I guarantee you that my equipment is the best in Australia.' Marie has sent Kevin demand letters, asking him to pay $10000 for the equipment hire, plus the amount for the damaged smoke and fog visual effects. Kevin is willing to pay Marie for the equipment, but he argues that $10000 is way too high, considering what happened. Furthermore, he remembered that Marie has subsequently agreed to a reduction of $1000 for the fees. This was not noted in Annex B of the contract. The only record he has is a Facebook messenger chat (reproduced below): Thanks so much Kevin for supporting my business. This means a lot to me. Please send my love to my niece, Ann. No worries, brother. I can give you less $1000. Will that be okay? No worries, sister. By the way Jane told me that our business is not doing well these days. She told me that we could be in the red. Can you give me a discount? Yes. Thank you, Marie. Looking forward to seeing you this weekend with Mum.

Similar questions

The Case: Ben purchased a used Laptop from Smart store during the sales period. He asked the salesperson, Rodny, if the Laptop had ever been damaged. Rodny (the salesperson) had never seen the Laptop before that morning and knew nothing of its history but quickly answered Ben’s question by stating: ‘No. It has never been damaged’. In fact, the Laptop had been seriously damaged previously and, although repaired and bought during the sales, it was worth much less than the value Ben had paid. When Ben learned the truth, he wanted to return the Laptop. Smart store replied that he cannot do that because they have a legally binding agreement and as per the agreement the items purchased during the sales cannot be returned. Questions: A) Does the behavior of the salesperson, Rodny, constitute deception? If it constitutes deception please precise which type of deception and explain in detail all the elements of the type of deception selected. B) Decide, based on the analysis made under…
:Unsolicited Merchandise: Are there certain circumstances in which a person receiving unsolicited merchandise should be required to return the merchandise to the sender if he or she does not wish to purchase it? What are some of the reasons that the federal government might wish to make no exceptions to the rule freeing consumers of any liability for failing to return unsolicited merchandise?
PLS HELP ASAP
Miss Cora Cruz would like to buy products from the company of Aurora P. Tan. To make sure that the supplier will not commit a mistake in the delivery of the said product/products, she specifically mentioned the details in her letter. If you are to be asked, what kind of business letter you will use for this particular purpose? Direction: Write a business letter intended for this transaction. Assume that you are Miss Cora, and the reader is : Dr. Lorna R. Dimatatac, President, TIP Teachers and Employees Credit and Savings Cooperative, 938 Aurora Blvd, Cubao, Quezon City. The following should be considered in your letter: 1. Name of the Articles ordered 2. Description of each item, giving size, style, quality, quantity, material, weight, or whatever will help in identifying the article wanted 3. Catalog number of the item if it available, if not, the page number of the catalog 4. Quantity of each item wanted 5. Price of each item, and the total price of the order 6. Method of…
Describe the workflow needed to authorize therapeutic under emergency use authorization
Pls help ASAP
If a loan shark promises you $500 if you will rough up one of his nonpaying customers to encourage prompt repayment, what sort of contract is this? a.Valid b.Void c.Voidable d.Enforceable
Which of the following statements is TRUE about an entrenching provision? Group of answer choices It must be altered by at least 75% of members present and voting. It can be amended by following the provisions of S.26(1) of the Companies Act. It can never be removed. It must be amended with the approval of all members.
A. Does a contract have to be in writing? B. List three types of terms in a contract. C. Distinguish terms in a contract from a representation.
Tommy posted a flyer on the bulletin board of a local music school, stating that he was hosting an event next month, for which he planned to hire a DJ. The flyer invited interested students to contact him with their hourly rates and three past clients whom Tommy could contact for references. The flyer also gave a local mailing address for this purpose. Leaving class one night, Gina happened to notice the billboard. She immediately wrote to Tommy indicating that she was available on the date in question, and that her hourly rate was $150. She also listed the names and contact information of three prior clients. Three days later, Tommy wrote back to Gina, stating that her references had all given excellent reviews, and asking whether Gina would be willing to work for $100 per hour if he advertised her services in the program provided for the event. Student received the letter the day after Tommy sent it, and wrote back the next day that she would be willing to drop her rate to $125 per…
Explain contract formation and fulfillment in brief. I need to prepare 5-10 minutes presentation for it.
Carl works as a waiter for a restaurant in Panama City Beach, Florida. The restaurant closes at 11:00 p.m. Two patrons came in at 10:30 p.m. and stayed until 12:00 a.m. Carl was their waiter and gave excellent customer service. The patrons left a $5.00 tip for Carl on a $200.00 bill and left a note saying, “Go back to school if you want more money.” Carl was so upset that he went home and posted on Facebook about how cheap, stinky, and ugly the patrons were. Carl mentioned the restaurant's name in his post. Carl had only 20 Facebook friends, and his privacy settings only allowed friends to see his posts. One of Carl's coworkers saw the post and told the restaurant manager. The restaurant manager terminated Carl based on violating two company policies: 1. The policy prohibiting speaking disparagingly about customers and 2. The policy prohibits casting the restaurant negatively on social media networks. Carl is not in a union. How do you analyze whether or not the restaurant's…