Purpose: Each How to submit: What to do: LDSP 5130 Leadership and Decision Making Group project: Heuristics: Advice to Your Future Self group will develop a set of heuristics or guidelines on teams, leadership, and related topics. Purposes include (1) to synthesize ideas on teams, leadership, and related topics developed before and during the class; (2) to integrate an ethical framework into the study of teams and leadership; (3) to stimulate discussion and collaboration among group members; and (4) to produce a useful artifact from the class that group members can refer back to after the class is over. This is a group project. One member from each group should submit the final project on behalf of the group. Submit your project as a (word processor) document in RTF format. RTF format stands for "Rich Text Format" and is a generic word processor format that you can choose under the "Save As" option when you save a document. For your project, name your file with your group's name and “heuristics.” Here is one example of the file name for a fictitious group named "beatles tribute band": beatles tribute band heuristics Your document should have the following centered at the top: LDSP 5130 - Leadership and Decision Making Heuristics: Advice To Your Future Self Your group's name Group member A's name, B's, C's, etc. for all group members Heuristics are a set of guidelines that people use to direct their activities. We all have a variety of heuristics in our lives, either formal or informal. A formal business heuristic might be a reorder point (trigger point) for reordering supplies like lumber, paper clips, or cans of broccoli at work. An informal personal heuristic might be how much drive time you allow for when you travel to work. Develop as a group a set of heuristics for your practice of decision making, problem solving, and/or leadership. Have at least twenty-five (25) items, although you may certainly have more. Your heuristics can include but are not limited to: Things you would do. Things you would not do. An ethical framework concerning decision making, problem solving, and leadership. Observations about the effectiveness of styles of leadership as they apply to decision making. Other insights about successful or unsuccessful decision making and associated leadership. At least some of your items should be devoted to particular topics or subtopics within or associated with decision making and problem solving. Here are some items to be sure to include in your heuristics: ☐ ☐ You A minimum of fifteen of your heuristics should have some sort of tie to the texts used in this class. A minimum of four should address ethical aspects of decision making and/or problem solving in some way. may have overlap between these criteria in the same heuristic item, such as ethical issues involved in making organizational decisions. At least one of your items should take a different perspective from something presented in our readings in the class - it is acceptable for you to 1 _ differ from something a textbook says. You will need to provide a brief explanation for each heuristic in your list and why you chose to include that. Please feel free to draw inspiration and ideas from other activities in this course including class member interactions, readings, discussion boards, quizzes, and your group tests. There is nothing wrong with taking an idea developed elsewhere in the course and incorporating into your set of heuristics. You may also include your own observations and input from outside of the course - things that you have experienced or read about. Insights that you have gotten from other classes or university activities or jobs or civic activities are welcome. Grading evaluation + Fatal Writing Error Policy. Grading Evaluation: Fails to meet expectations. Assignment not completed or minimal submission. The grading evaluation is presented below. Grading Evaluation: Meets expectations. A set of heuristics is submitted with a consistent "look and feel" for all the items listed. Some explanation accompanies each heuristic listed. Grading Evaluation: Exceeds expectations: A-level work. (Expands on "Meets expectations" performance) Explanation accompanies each heuristic item about why that item was included/why the heuristic item was written as such; the set of heuristics is organized or grouped according to certain themes. The Fatal Writing Error Policy is in effect for this assignment and follows below: Fatal Error Writing Policy. Used with permission from Dr. Doug Eder, SIUE (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville) School of Business and Dr. Roy Baker, Austin Peay State University School of Business. Modified for use in this class by William Rayburn. All written assignments must meet minimal standards to be acceptable. These standards address spelling, punctuation, format, and basic grammar. The term Fatal Errors refers to technical writing errors and errors of form. Specifically, Fatal Errors include the following: each different word misspelled each run-on sentence or comma splice each serious error in punctuation each error in verb-tense or subject-verb agreement lack of conformity with assignment format (such as title page and abstract if specified) and other requirements connected to the assignment. each improper citation each faulty homonym It is your responsibility to check your assignments before they are submitted to identify and correct fatal writing errors. The instructor reserves the right to deduct points for fatal errors. Assignments with more than three (3) fatal writing errors on any one page or more than ten (10) in the entire document are unacceptable. The instructor reserves the right to stop grading when this figure is exceeded and has the option to enter a grade of zero (0) for that assignment. There will be no chance to correct mistakes. 2

Management, Loose-Leaf Version
13th Edition
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:Richard L. Daft
Chapter7: Planning And Goal Setting
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CFCA
icon
Related questions
Question
Purpose:
Each
How to submit:
What to do:
LDSP 5130 Leadership and Decision Making
Group project: Heuristics: Advice to Your Future Self
group will develop a set of heuristics or guidelines on teams, leadership, and related topics.
Purposes include (1) to synthesize ideas on teams, leadership, and related topics developed before
and during the class; (2) to integrate an ethical framework into the study of teams and leadership;
(3) to stimulate discussion and collaboration among group members; and (4) to produce a useful
artifact from the class that group members can refer back to after the class is over.
This is a group project. One member from each group should submit the final project on behalf of
the group. Submit your project as a (word processor) document in RTF format. RTF format
stands for "Rich Text Format" and is a generic word processor format that you can choose under
the "Save As" option when you save a document.
For your project, name your file with your group's name and “heuristics.” Here is one example of
the file name for a fictitious group named "beatles tribute band":
beatles tribute band heuristics
Your document should have the following centered at the top:
LDSP 5130 - Leadership and Decision Making
Heuristics: Advice To Your Future Self
Your group's name
Group member A's name, B's, C's, etc. for all
group members
Heuristics are a set of guidelines that people use to direct their activities. We all have a variety of
heuristics in our lives, either formal or informal. A formal business heuristic might be a reorder
point (trigger point) for reordering supplies like lumber, paper clips, or cans of broccoli at work.
An informal personal heuristic might be how much drive time you allow for when you travel to
work.
Develop as a group a set of heuristics for your practice of decision making, problem solving,
and/or leadership. Have at least twenty-five (25) items, although you may certainly have more.
Your heuristics can include but are not limited to:
Things you would do.
Things you would not do.
An ethical framework concerning decision making, problem solving, and leadership.
Observations about the effectiveness of styles of leadership as they apply to decision
making.
Other insights about successful or unsuccessful decision making and associated
leadership.
At least some of your items should be devoted to particular topics or subtopics within or
associated with decision making and problem solving. Here are some items to be sure to include
in your heuristics:
☐
☐
You
A minimum of fifteen of your heuristics should have some sort of tie to the texts used in this
class.
A minimum of four should address ethical aspects of decision making and/or problem solving
in some way.
may
have overlap between these criteria in the same heuristic item, such as ethical issues
involved in making organizational decisions. At least one of your items should take a different
perspective from something presented in our readings in the class - it is acceptable for you to
1
_
Transcribed Image Text:Purpose: Each How to submit: What to do: LDSP 5130 Leadership and Decision Making Group project: Heuristics: Advice to Your Future Self group will develop a set of heuristics or guidelines on teams, leadership, and related topics. Purposes include (1) to synthesize ideas on teams, leadership, and related topics developed before and during the class; (2) to integrate an ethical framework into the study of teams and leadership; (3) to stimulate discussion and collaboration among group members; and (4) to produce a useful artifact from the class that group members can refer back to after the class is over. This is a group project. One member from each group should submit the final project on behalf of the group. Submit your project as a (word processor) document in RTF format. RTF format stands for "Rich Text Format" and is a generic word processor format that you can choose under the "Save As" option when you save a document. For your project, name your file with your group's name and “heuristics.” Here is one example of the file name for a fictitious group named "beatles tribute band": beatles tribute band heuristics Your document should have the following centered at the top: LDSP 5130 - Leadership and Decision Making Heuristics: Advice To Your Future Self Your group's name Group member A's name, B's, C's, etc. for all group members Heuristics are a set of guidelines that people use to direct their activities. We all have a variety of heuristics in our lives, either formal or informal. A formal business heuristic might be a reorder point (trigger point) for reordering supplies like lumber, paper clips, or cans of broccoli at work. An informal personal heuristic might be how much drive time you allow for when you travel to work. Develop as a group a set of heuristics for your practice of decision making, problem solving, and/or leadership. Have at least twenty-five (25) items, although you may certainly have more. Your heuristics can include but are not limited to: Things you would do. Things you would not do. An ethical framework concerning decision making, problem solving, and leadership. Observations about the effectiveness of styles of leadership as they apply to decision making. Other insights about successful or unsuccessful decision making and associated leadership. At least some of your items should be devoted to particular topics or subtopics within or associated with decision making and problem solving. Here are some items to be sure to include in your heuristics: ☐ ☐ You A minimum of fifteen of your heuristics should have some sort of tie to the texts used in this class. A minimum of four should address ethical aspects of decision making and/or problem solving in some way. may have overlap between these criteria in the same heuristic item, such as ethical issues involved in making organizational decisions. At least one of your items should take a different perspective from something presented in our readings in the class - it is acceptable for you to 1 _
differ from something a textbook says. You will need to provide a brief explanation for each
heuristic in your list and why you chose to include that.
Please feel free to draw inspiration and ideas from other activities in this course including class
member interactions, readings, discussion boards, quizzes, and your group tests. There is nothing
wrong with taking an idea developed elsewhere in the course and incorporating into your set of
heuristics. You may also include your own observations and input from outside of the course -
things that you have experienced or read about. Insights that you have gotten from other classes or
university activities or jobs or civic activities are welcome.
Grading evaluation + Fatal Writing Error Policy.
Grading
Evaluation:
Fails to meet
expectations.
Assignment not
completed or
minimal
submission.
The grading evaluation is presented below.
Grading Evaluation:
Meets expectations.
A set of heuristics is submitted
with a consistent "look and feel"
for all the items listed. Some
explanation accompanies each
heuristic listed.
Grading Evaluation:
Exceeds expectations: A-level work.
(Expands on "Meets expectations" performance)
Explanation accompanies each heuristic item about why
that item was included/why the heuristic item was
written as such; the set of heuristics is organized or
grouped according to certain themes.
The Fatal Writing Error Policy is in effect for this assignment and follows below:
Fatal Error Writing Policy. Used with permission from Dr. Doug Eder, SIUE (Southern
Illinois University Edwardsville) School of Business and Dr. Roy Baker, Austin Peay State
University School of Business. Modified for use in this class by William Rayburn.
All written assignments must meet minimal standards to be acceptable. These standards address
spelling, punctuation, format, and basic grammar. The term Fatal Errors refers to technical writing
errors and errors of form. Specifically, Fatal Errors include the following:
each different word misspelled
each run-on sentence or comma splice
each serious error in punctuation
each error in verb-tense or subject-verb agreement
lack of conformity with assignment format (such as title page and abstract if specified)
and other requirements connected to the assignment.
each improper citation
each faulty homonym
It is your responsibility to check your assignments before they are submitted to identify and
correct fatal writing errors. The instructor reserves the right to deduct points for fatal errors.
Assignments with more than three (3) fatal writing errors on any one page or more than ten (10) in
the entire document are unacceptable. The instructor reserves the right to stop grading when this
figure is exceeded and has the option to enter a grade of zero (0) for that assignment. There will
be no chance to correct mistakes.
2
Transcribed Image Text:differ from something a textbook says. You will need to provide a brief explanation for each heuristic in your list and why you chose to include that. Please feel free to draw inspiration and ideas from other activities in this course including class member interactions, readings, discussion boards, quizzes, and your group tests. There is nothing wrong with taking an idea developed elsewhere in the course and incorporating into your set of heuristics. You may also include your own observations and input from outside of the course - things that you have experienced or read about. Insights that you have gotten from other classes or university activities or jobs or civic activities are welcome. Grading evaluation + Fatal Writing Error Policy. Grading Evaluation: Fails to meet expectations. Assignment not completed or minimal submission. The grading evaluation is presented below. Grading Evaluation: Meets expectations. A set of heuristics is submitted with a consistent "look and feel" for all the items listed. Some explanation accompanies each heuristic listed. Grading Evaluation: Exceeds expectations: A-level work. (Expands on "Meets expectations" performance) Explanation accompanies each heuristic item about why that item was included/why the heuristic item was written as such; the set of heuristics is organized or grouped according to certain themes. The Fatal Writing Error Policy is in effect for this assignment and follows below: Fatal Error Writing Policy. Used with permission from Dr. Doug Eder, SIUE (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville) School of Business and Dr. Roy Baker, Austin Peay State University School of Business. Modified for use in this class by William Rayburn. All written assignments must meet minimal standards to be acceptable. These standards address spelling, punctuation, format, and basic grammar. The term Fatal Errors refers to technical writing errors and errors of form. Specifically, Fatal Errors include the following: each different word misspelled each run-on sentence or comma splice each serious error in punctuation each error in verb-tense or subject-verb agreement lack of conformity with assignment format (such as title page and abstract if specified) and other requirements connected to the assignment. each improper citation each faulty homonym It is your responsibility to check your assignments before they are submitted to identify and correct fatal writing errors. The instructor reserves the right to deduct points for fatal errors. Assignments with more than three (3) fatal writing errors on any one page or more than ten (10) in the entire document are unacceptable. The instructor reserves the right to stop grading when this figure is exceeded and has the option to enter a grade of zero (0) for that assignment. There will be no chance to correct mistakes. 2
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:
9781305969308
Author:
Richard L. Daft
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub