MSI is considering outsourcing the production of the handheld control module used with some of its products. The company has received a bid from Monte Legend Co. (MLC) to produce 21,000 units of the module per year for $24.00 each. The following information pertains to MSI's production of the control modules: Direct materials $ 13 Direct labor 6. Variable manufacturing overhead 4 Fixed manufacturing overhead Total cost per unit $ 28 MSI has determined that it could eliminate all variable costs if the control modules were produced externally, but none of the fixed overhead is avoidable. At this time, MSI has no specific use in mind for the space that is currently dedicated to the control module production. Required: 1. Compute the difference in cost between making and buying the control module. 2. Should MSI buy the modules from MLC or continue to make them? 3-a. Suppose that the MSI space currently used for the modules could be utilized by a new product line that would generate $29,000 in annual profit. Recompute the difference in cost between making and buying under this scenario. 3-b. Does this change your recommendation to MSI?

MSI is considering outsourcing the production of the handheld control module used with some of its products. The company has received a bid from Monte Legend Co. (MLC) to produce 21,000 units of the module per year for $24.00 each. The following information pertains to MSI's production of the control modules: Direct materials $ 13 Direct labor 6. Variable manufacturing overhead 4 Fixed manufacturing overhead Total cost per unit $ 28 MSI has determined that it could eliminate all variable costs if the control modules were produced externally, but none of the fixed overhead is avoidable. At this time, MSI has no specific use in mind for the space that is currently dedicated to the control module production. Required: 1. Compute the difference in cost between making and buying the control module. 2. Should MSI buy the modules from MLC or continue to make them? 3-a. Suppose that the MSI space currently used for the modules could be utilized by a new product line that would generate $29,000 in annual profit. Recompute the difference in cost between making and buying under this scenario. 3-b. Does this change your recommendation to MSI?

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Alpesh
Corrigan Enterprises is studying the acquisition of two electrical component insertion systems for producing its sole product, the universal gismo. Data relevant to the systems follow. Model number 6754: Variable costs, $16.00 per unit Annual fixed costs, $986,300 Model number 4399: Variable costs, $11.80 per unit Annual fixed costs, $1,114,300 Corrigan's selling price is $66 per unit for the universal gismo, which is subject to a 15 percent sales commission. (In the following requirements, ignore income taxes.) 2-a. Calculate the net income of the two systems if sales and production are expected to average 63,400 units per year. Model Number 6754 Model Number 4399 Net Income
Munabhai
Bramble Company manufactures widgets. Blossom Company has approached Bramble with a proposal to sell the company widgets at a price of $60500 for 100,000 units. Bramble is currently making these components in its own factory. The following costs are associated with this part of the process when 100,000 units are produced: Direct material $22700 Direct labour 23000 Manufacturing overhead 29000 Total $74700 The manufacturing overhead consists of $12300 of costs that will be eliminated if the components are no longer produced by Bramble. From Bramble’s point of view, how much is the incremental cost or savings if the widgets are bought instead of made? $14200 incremental savings $2500 incremental savings $2500 incremental cost $14200 incremental cost
AMD is contemplating a decision to either continue producing a unique line of microprocessors, or discontinue production. • The AMD factory manufactures approximately 100,000 of such processors and generates $3,000,000 in revenues and incurs $2,000,000 in variable costs. • AMD estimates that if the product is discontinued ADM would save $ 1,500,000 in fixed manufacturing costs in engineering support and depreciation costs of production equipment. • Should AMD keep or discontinue production of this product line?
Fyodor Corporation has a Parts Division that does work for other Divisions in the company as well as for outside customers. The company's Machine Division has asked the Parts Division to provide it with 6,000 special parts each year. The special parts would require $21 per unit in variable production costs. The Machine Division has a bid from an outside supplier for the special parts at $31.20 per unit. In order to have time and space to produce the special part, the Parts Division would have to cut back production of another part-the QR4 that it presently is producing. The QR4 sells for $40 per unit and requires $20 per unit in variable production costs. Packaging and shipping costs of the QR4 are $2 per unit. Packaging and shipping costs for the new special part would be only $0.50 per unit. The Parts Division is now producing and selling 30,000 units of the QR4 each year. Production and sales of the QR4 would drop by 5% if the new special part is produced for the Machine Division.…
The Pixels Corporation produces a component used in the manufacture of one of its best-selling products. The costs associated with the production of 10,000 units of this component are presented in the table above. The PCAOB Corp. offered to sell Pixels 10,000 units of the same part at a price of $36 per unit. Assume that Pixels has no alternative use for the factory facilities that would be released. Based on all of the information above, should Pixels manufacture their own part or outsource to PCAOB? Note that if you agree to outsource, you would save $60,000 in indirect fixed costs. Direct Materials $90,000 Direct Manufacturing Labor $130,000 Variable Manufacturing Overhead $60,000 Fixed Manufacturing Overhead $140,000 Total Costs $420,000 a. Buy the part from PCAOB because you save $6 per unit b. Manufacture the part because it saves $6 per unit c. Make the part because you save $2 per unit d. Buy the part from PCAOB because you save $60,000
Cairney, Incorporated manufactures a specialized part used in internal combustion engines. The annual demand for the part is 261,000 units. The facility has a practical capacity of 276,000 units annually. The company leased the current facility because facilities capable of manufacturing the unit require machines that can produce 69,000 units each. The annual cost of the facility is $1,092,960. The variable cost of a part is $4. Required: a. What cost per unit should the cost system report to facilitate management decision making? Note: Round your answer to 2 decimal places. b. What is the cost of excess capacity? a. Cost per unit b. Cost of excess capacity $ $ 8.19 122,850
Futura Company purchases the 40,000 starters that it installs in its standard line of farm tractors from a supplier for the price of $8.40 per unit. Due to a reduction in output, the company now has idle capacity that could be used to produce the starters rather than buying them from an outside supplier. However, the company's chief engineer is opposed to making the starters because the production cost per unit is $9.20 as shown below: Direct materials Direct labor Supervision Depreciation Variable manufacturing overhead Rent Total product cost Per Unit $ 3.10 2.70 1.50 1.00 0.60 0.30 $9.20 Total $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 12,000 If Futura decides to make the starters, a supervisor would have to be hired (at a salary of $60,000) to oversee production. However, the company has sufficient idle tools and machinery such that no new equipment would have to be purchased. The rent charge above is based on space utilized in the plant. The total rent on the plant is $80,000 per period. Depreciation is…
In the last 6 months, demand for one of Appleby Company's products has dropped off considerably, due mainly to it becoming obsolescent as a result of technological change. Knowing that the equipment used in the manufacture of this product may not be easy to sell, Appleby spent $50,000 on consultants to determine whether it could use the equipment to produce a new product under license by another company. The consultant has determined that this product would have variable production costs of $65 per unit and should sell at a price of $90/unit. The licensing royalty is 5% of gross product revenue. Estimated annual demand is 20,000 units per year. Additional annual operating costs related to this product are $30,000/year (excluding depreciation). Depreciation on the equipment is $15,000. Annual depreciation expense is a: O a. Sunk cost O b. Relevant cost O c. Both sunk and Irrelevant cost Od. Irrelevant cost
Futura Company purchases the 67,000 starters that it installs in its standard line of farm tractors from a supplier for the price of $11.30 per unit. Due to a reduction in output, the company now has idle capacity that could be used to produce the starters rather than buying them from an outside supplier. However, the company's chief engineer is opposed to making the starters because the production cost per unit is $12.00 as shown below: Direct materials Direct labor Supervision Depreciation Variable manufacturing overhead Rent Total product cost Per Unit $ 5.00 3.20 1.60 1.20 0.60 0.40 $ 12.00 Total $ 107,200 $ 80,400 $ 26,800 If Futura decides to make the starters, a supervisor would have to be hired (at a salary of $107,200) to oversee production. However, the company has sufficient idle tools and machinery such that no new equipment would have to be purchased. The rent charge above is based on space utilized in the plant. The total rent on the plant is $87,000 per period.…
Futura Company purchases the 76,000 starters that it installs in its standard line of farm tractors from a supplier for the price of $12.60 per unit. Due to a reduction in output, the company now has idle capacity that could be used to produce the starters rather than buying them from an outside supplier. However, the company's chief engineer is opposed to making the starters because the production cost per unit is $13.70 as shown below: Direct materials Direct labor Supervision Depreciation Variable manufacturing overhead Rent Total product cost Per Unit $ 6.00 3.50 1.80 1.40 0.60 0.40 $ 13.70 Financial advantage Total $ 221,600 $ 136,800 $ 106,400 If Futura decides to make the starters, a supervisor would have to be hired (at a salary of $136,800) to oversee production. However, the company has sufficient idle tools and machinery such that no new equipment would have to be purchased. The rent charge above is based on space utilized in the plant. The total rent on the plant is $86,000…