In the LCAO method, the energy versus separation for a diatomic molecule revealed that a bonding wave function resulted in a deep minimum in the potential energy, resulting in an equilibrium state. The energy-separation curve has no minimum for the antibonding wave function. Explain qualitatively how the charge distribution (or 1912 distribution, if you like) differs between the bonding and anti- ponding configurations and why the ponding configuration is more stable. That is, where and why is the electron density located?

icon
Related questions
Question
In the LCA0 method, the energy
versus separation for a diatomic
molecule revealed that a bonding
wave function resulted in a deep
minimum in the potential energy,
resulting in an equilibrium state.
The energy-separation curve has no
minimum for the antibonding wave
function. Explain qualitatively how
the charge distribution (or 1912
distribution, if you like) differs
between the bonding and anti-
bonding configurations and why the
bonding configuration is more
stable. That is, where and why is
the electron density located?
Octivate Windows
Transcribed Image Text:In the LCA0 method, the energy versus separation for a diatomic molecule revealed that a bonding wave function resulted in a deep minimum in the potential energy, resulting in an equilibrium state. The energy-separation curve has no minimum for the antibonding wave function. Explain qualitatively how the charge distribution (or 1912 distribution, if you like) differs between the bonding and anti- bonding configurations and why the bonding configuration is more stable. That is, where and why is the electron density located? Octivate Windows
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer