In the history of eminent domain, the Kelo v. New London, Connecticut decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005 affirmed th community being: O able to use eminent domain to acquire property for private development if it serves public purpose even if the current land use is not big O able to use eminent domain to acquire property for private development if it serves public purpose and the current land use is blighted. O prohibited from using eminent domain. O restricted to use of eminent domain only for actual government (public) land uses.

icon
Related questions
Question
Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion
In the history of eminent domain, the Kelo v. New London, Connecticut decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005 affirmed th
community being:
O able to use eminent domain to acquire property for private development if it serves public purpose even if the current land use is not ti
O able to use eminent domain to acquire property for private development if it serves public purpose and the current land use is blighted.
O prohibited from using eminent domain.
O restricted to use of eminent domain only for actual government (public) land uses.
Transcribed Image Text:In the history of eminent domain, the Kelo v. New London, Connecticut decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005 affirmed th community being: O able to use eminent domain to acquire property for private development if it serves public purpose even if the current land use is not ti O able to use eminent domain to acquire property for private development if it serves public purpose and the current land use is blighted. O prohibited from using eminent domain. O restricted to use of eminent domain only for actual government (public) land uses.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer