In the case Partridge v Mallandaine (UK, 1886) the matter of the treatment of gambling winnings for tax purposes came into focus. Analyse the case of Partridge v Mallandaine a) Do you agree with the ruling in the case? If you do defend your answer by stating and explaining at least 3 reasons for your agreement. b) If you are not in agreement with the ruling, then defend your answer by stating and explaining at least 3 valid reasons for your disagreement.

In the case Partridge v Mallandaine (UK, 1886) the matter of the treatment of gambling winnings for tax purposes came into focus. Analyse the case of Partridge v Mallandaine a) Do you agree with the ruling in the case? If you do defend your answer by stating and explaining at least 3 reasons for your agreement. b) If you are not in agreement with the ruling, then defend your answer by stating and explaining at least 3 valid reasons for your disagreement.

Income Tax Fundamentals 2020

38th Edition

ISBN:9780357391129

Author:WHITTENBURG

Publisher:WHITTENBURG

Chapter12: Tax Administration And Tax Planning

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 19MCQ: If a U.S. Tax Court agrees with the taxpayer on appeal that the IRS position was largely...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The following is true of a Circuit of Appeals: a. The taxpayer who originated his claim in a US District Court may be appeal decision to any Circuit Court of Appeals the taxpayer chooses b. The Court of Appeals may affirm the lower court decision, reverse the decision or retry the facts on appeal. c. The Circuit Courts of Appeal follow stare decisis and are bound by their previous decisions, but they are not required to follow the decisions of other Circuits d. All of the above.
If a U.S. Tax Court agrees with the taxpayer on appeal that the IRS position was largely unjustified, which of the following is correct? The taxpayer must still pay administrative and litigation costs. The taxpayer may recover administrative but not litigation costs. The taxpayer may recover litigation but not administrative costs. To be eligible to recover some of the administrative and litigation costs, the taxpayer must have tried to resolve the case administratively, including going through the appeals process, and must have given the IRS the information necessary to resolve the case. None of the above.
In what circumstances can a taxpayer challenge an assessment outside the ordinary appeal process. Discussion should be strictly based on statutory and common law. Explain briefly.
The concept of reverse onus, as it relates to taxation in Canada, suggests: Select one: O a. We should refrain from exercising tax avoidance O b. We should engage in tax evasion O C. We may have to go through an appeal process, firstly with CRA (Canada Revenue Agency) and possibly through the courts, if we disagree with a reassessment O d. We are not required to comply with a reassessment from CRA because a court ruling will be required firstly
Pursuant to the Golsen Rule: a. the Tax Court must follow all Circuit Court of Appeals decisions. b. the Tax Court must follow decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Circuit in which the taxpayer's appeal may be filed. c. the Tax Court may adopt its own interpretation of the tax law, if the taxpayer's Circuit Court has not ruled on the matter. d. Two of the above.
Q. Explain the difference between a regular decision by the Tax Court and a memorandum decision by this court. Q. Many Tax Court decisions end with the phrase, ``Decision will be entered under Rule 155.'' What does this mean? Q. Find the court decision Stuart Hirshfield v. U.S. (88 AFTR 2d 2001-7095). Use the Citator to evaluate the reliability of this court decision. Include a print out of your results. Explain how you located this information. Q. You are reviewing a client's file and notice that a previous tax return position was taken based on a reveune ruling. You want to examine the current status of the revenune to see if there have been any changes that will affect the client's position. Provide the cite for the following Revenue Ruling and note its current status. Q. A partner at your firm has called you into his office for some help with a client issue. The client has a transaction that involes S. 162. The partner would like you to determine if any revenue rulings has been…
I. Multiple Choice: Choose the correct answer. 1. The levying and imposition of tax and the collection of tax are processes which constitute the taxation system. a. Basis of Taxation b. Aspects of Taxation 2. No person shall be imprisoned for the non-payment of this. c. Nature of Taxation d. Theory of Taxation c. Income Tax d. Property Tax a. Excise Tax b. Poll Tax 3. Tax which is demanded from the persons whom the law intends or desires to pay it. a. Income 4. Tax where the rate increases as the tax base increases. b. Direct c. Indirect d. Excise c. Regressive d. Proportional a. Indirect 5. Catriona Grace, a taxpayer, gives the following reasons for refusing to pay a tax. Which of her reasons is not acceptable for legally refusing to pay the tax? a. That she has been deprived of due process of law. b. The she will derive no benefit from the tax. c. That there is lack of territorial jurisdiction. d. That the prescriptive period for the tax has lapsed. 6. Wiley Cyprus, a Canadian…
3.(T/F) When a petition is filed with the Tax Court, the taxpayer is required to pay the deficiency only if he loses, not before. 5. (T/F) Once the Supreme Court makes a decision, all circuit courts are required to follow this precedent, as long as the statute is current.
The following reasons may be given by a taxpayer in refusing to pay his tax liability. Which is not acceptable for legally refusing to pay the tax? o That he will derived no benefit from the tax. o That he has been deprived of due process of law o That the prescription period for the collection of tax has lapsed. o That there is lack of territorial jurisdiction (And please explain the reason why, thank you)
Jamareo has found a "favorable" authority directly on point for his tax question. Required: a. If the authority is an administrative authority, which specific type of authority would he prefer to answer his question b. Which administrative authority would he least prefer to answer his question? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B If the authority is an administrative authority, which specific type of authority would he prefer to answer his question? M Revenue Ruling Private Letter Ruling Revenue Procedure Treasury Department Regulation Required A Required B >
Explain the significance of Lucas v. Earl and Helvering v. Horst. C O A. Lucas v. Earl, the Supreme Court held that earnings from labor are taxed to the person who performs the services rather than the person who receives the income. In Helvering v. Horst, the Supreme Court held that income from property is taxed to the person who owns the property rather than the person who receives the income. One cannot assign income by arranging to have payment made to another person. O B. Lucas v. Earl, the Supreme Court held that income from property is taxed to the person who owns the property rather than the person who receives the income. Helvering v. Horst, the Supreme Court held that earnings from labor are taxed to the person who performs the services rather than the person who receives the income. OC. Helvering v. Horst, the Supreme Court held that earnings from labor are taxed to the person who performs the services rather than the person who receives the income. Lucas v. Earl, the…
“[A] taxpayer has no obligation to pay more taxes than are legally owed, and a [CPA] has a duty to the taxpayer to assist in achieving that result.” – SSTS No. 1, ¶ 11. This statement comports with what CPAs more commonly say, which is that tax avoidance is perfectly fine while it’s tax evasion that’s criminal. As a future CPA (or business / financial professional), do you agree with this philosophy? Why or why not?