Imagine that you have been given a job as an economic advisor to evaluate a certain competitive US manufacturing industry. Your (accurate) statistical analysis indicates the market is characterized by demand of Qd = 300 – 3P and supply of Qs = 2P – 50. > Solve for equilibrium price P1 and quantity Q1. > Depict the supply curve S1 and demand curve D1 on the usual P, Q diagram. Label all relevant intercepts (including two intercepts for the demand curve and one intercept for the supply curve). Clearly indicate and label the market equilibrium. > Graphically indicate the areas of Consumer Surplus (CS1) and Producer Surplus (PS1). > Compute the values of Consumer Surplus (CS1) and Producer Surplus (PS1), clearly indicating the units that CS and PS are measured in. Continuing your analysis of the competitive US manufacturing industry from Question 1, with demand of Qd = 300 – 3P and supply of Qs = 2P – 50, suppose an increase in labor costs causes the supply curve to decrease, shifting the curve up by $20 for every given quantity Q. Determine the new supply equation. (Hint: What approach have you used to model taxes and subsidies in previous assignments?) Solve for equilibrium price P2 and quantity Q2. Depict the original supply S1, the new supply S2, and the original demand D1 on the usual P, Q diagram. Label all intercepts (including two intercepts for the demand curve and one intercept for the supply curve). Clearly indicate and label the new market equilibrium. Graphically indicate the areas of Consumer Surplus (CS2) and Producer Surplus (PS2) that resulted from the new market equilibrium. Compute the values of Consumer Surplus (CS2) and Producer Surplus (PS2) associated with the new market equilibrium, clearly indicating the units that CS and PS are measured in. What was the impact of the shift in the supply on consumers and producers, based on the comparison of CS and PS in Questions 1 and 2? In other words, were each of these two groups of market participants hurt or made better off by change? Why? (Narrative response; suggested length of three to four sentences or one paragraph.)

Imagine that you have been given a job as an economic advisor to evaluate a certain competitive US manufacturing industry. Your (accurate) statistical analysis indicates the market is characterized by demand of Qd = 300 – 3P and supply of Qs = 2P – 50. > Solve for equilibrium price P1 and quantity Q1. > Depict the supply curve S1 and demand curve D1 on the usual P, Q diagram. Label all relevant intercepts (including two intercepts for the demand curve and one intercept for the supply curve). Clearly indicate and label the market equilibrium. > Graphically indicate the areas of Consumer Surplus (CS1) and Producer Surplus (PS1). > Compute the values of Consumer Surplus (CS1) and Producer Surplus (PS1), clearly indicating the units that CS and PS are measured in. Continuing your analysis of the competitive US manufacturing industry from Question 1, with demand of Qd = 300 – 3P and supply of Qs = 2P – 50, suppose an increase in labor costs causes the supply curve to decrease, shifting the curve up by $20 for every given quantity Q. Determine the new supply equation. (Hint: What approach have you used to model taxes and subsidies in previous assignments?) Solve for equilibrium price P2 and quantity Q2. Depict the original supply S1, the new supply S2, and the original demand D1 on the usual P, Q diagram. Label all intercepts (including two intercepts for the demand curve and one intercept for the supply curve). Clearly indicate and label the new market equilibrium. Graphically indicate the areas of Consumer Surplus (CS2) and Producer Surplus (PS2) that resulted from the new market equilibrium. Compute the values of Consumer Surplus (CS2) and Producer Surplus (PS2) associated with the new market equilibrium, clearly indicating the units that CS and PS are measured in. What was the impact of the shift in the supply on consumers and producers, based on the comparison of CS and PS in Questions 1 and 2? In other words, were each of these two groups of market participants hurt or made better off by change? Why? (Narrative response; suggested length of three to four sentences or one paragraph.)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

> Solve for equilibrium price P₁ and quantity Q₁.

> Depict the supply curve S₁ and demand curve D₁ on the usual P, Q diagram. Label all relevant intercepts (including two intercepts for the demand curve and one intercept for the supply curve). Clearly indicate and label the market equilibrium.

> Graphically indicate the areas of Consumer Surplus (CS₁) and Producer Surplus (PS₁).

> Compute the values of Consumer Surplus (CS₁) and Producer Surplus (PS₁), clearly indicating the units that CS and PS are measured in.

Continuing your analysis of the competitive US manufacturing industry from Question 1, with demand of Q_d = 300 – 3P and supply of Q_s = 2P – 50, suppose an increase in labor costs causes the supply curve to decrease, shifting the curve up by $20 for every given quantity Q.

Determine the new supply equation. (Hint: What approach have you used to model taxes and subsidies in previous assignments?)
Solve for equilibrium price P₂ and quantity Q₂.
Depict the original supply S₁, the new supply S₂, and the original demand D₁ on the usual P, Q diagram. Label all intercepts (including two intercepts for the demand curve and one intercept for the supply curve). Clearly indicate and label the new market equilibrium.
Graphically indicate the areas of Consumer Surplus (CS₂) and Producer Surplus (PS₂) that resulted from the new market equilibrium.
Compute the values of Consumer Surplus (CS₂) and Producer Surplus (PS₂) associated with the new market equilibrium, clearly indicating the units that CS and PS are measured in.
What was the impact of the shift in the supply on consumers and producers, based on the comparison of CS and PS in Questions 1 and 2? In other words, were each of these two groups of market participants hurt or made better off by change? Why? (Narrative response; suggested length of three to four sentences or one paragraph.)

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here