Gianna contracts with Boris for Boris to bring a llama to her daughter Vivian's birthday party in exchange for $125. Gianna later learns her daughter is frightened of llamas. She contacts Boris and Boris agrees to bring a pony to the party for $75 instead. Which of the following is true of the original agreement involving the llama and the $125? It was discharged by mutual rescission It was discharged by accord and satisfaction It was discharged by substituted contract It was breached

Gianna contracts with Boris for Boris to bring a llama to her daughter Vivian's birthday party in exchange for $125. Gianna later learns her daughter is frightened of llamas. She contacts Boris and Boris agrees to bring a pony to the party for $75 instead. Which of the following is true of the original agreement involving the llama and the $125? It was discharged by mutual rescission It was discharged by accord and satisfaction It was discharged by substituted contract It was breached

Similar questions

b) Write two elements of a contract of indemnity.
Henk made an oral contract with Joel's garage to work as the manger of the garage for the next two years. Joel wrote Henk a letter stating all of the terms of the oral contract and signed the letter. Joel refuses to honor the agreement so Henk sues for breach of contract. Joel contends that their agreement can’t be enforced because it was a two-year contract and had to be in writing under the Statute of Frauds. Who wins the suit? Why?
Andrews and Brown hired a bookkeeper, Jenice, and gave her general authority to issue company checks drawn on SunTrust Bank so that Jenice can pay employees’ wages and other company bills. Jenice decides to cheat her employers out of $10,000 by issuing a check payable to the Bayside Distributors, one of the suppliers of seafood and fresh local produce. Jenice does not intend for Bayside to receive any of the money, nor is Bayside entitled to the payment. Jenice endorses the check in Bayside’s name and deposits the check in an account that she opened at Wells Fargo Bank in the name “Bayfood Dist. Co.” Wells Fargo accepts the check and collects payment from the drawee bank, SunTrust. SunTrust charges [Name of Restaurant] account $10,000. Denice transfers $10,000 out of the Bayside account and closes it. [Name of Restaurant] discovers the fraud and demands that the bank return the money. Evaluate which party or parties bear the loss.
Emily, seeking to induce Nishi Whiskey, LLC (Nishi), to make a contract to buy a tract of land at a price of $5,000 an acre, tells Nishi that the tract contains 100 acres. Emily knows that it contains only 90 acres. Nishi is induced by the statement concerning the acreage to make the contract. Is the contract voidable by Nishi? Explain
Josue is part of a business entity in which the parties are protected against personal liability for business debts. What type of business entity is this? Is it able to be registered as a brokerage? It is an LLC. It may be registered as a brokerage. It is an LLC. It may NOT be registered as a brokerage. It is a corporation. It may be registered as a brokerage. It is a corporation. It may NOT be registered as a brokerage.
In a written contract, Sheldon agreed to tutor the children of Mrs. Smith for a certain period of time. However, Sheldon, prior to starting classes, announced that he would not be able to tutor the children due to other commitments of his. In this case, there has been a(n): rescission. negligent breach. anticipatory breach. O malpractice.
Dorian breeds Scottish Fold kittens and informs Stevie that she is a cat breeder. Stevie says she is interested in purchasing one of her kittens. Dorian calls Stevie a month later and says Stevie’s kitten is ready for pickup and Stevie owes her $1,000. Stevie refuses, stating they did not have a valid contract. Dorian states they did have a valid contract. Who is correct?
A pizza parlor owner uses a vending machine company to service his soft drinks.The owner of the company sells his route to Mr X and delegates all of his contractsincluding the one with the pizza parlor. This enrages the pizza parlor owner, because Mr. X was engaged to the pizza parlor owner's sister and left her standing at the altar. He claims that the obligation is non-delegable because it's "personal". Do you agree
Arlene, a minor, buys a stereo from Savannah and signs a promissory note in the amount of $500 payable to Savannah within six months to cover the cost of the stereo. Savannah indorses the promissory note and transfers it to Alvin as payment for Alvin painting Savannah's house. When Alvin tries to collect the note from Arlene at the end of the six months, if Arlene refuses to pay: Alvin will be successful in collecting the payment because he is a holder in due course. Alvin will be successful because he is not a holder in due course. Alvin will be unsuccessful in collecting the payment even though he is a holder in due course.
Wolcott and Sarah, both merchants and residents of Gainesville, Florida, aspire to enter into a contract with each other for the sale/purchase of goods. After Wolcott makes an offer to Sarah, Sarah responds with a written confirmation of acceptance; however, this written confirmation of acceptance states additional terms that are not present in Wolcott's offer. Nevertheless, Wolcott's offer did not expressly limit acceptance to the terms of his offer and Sarah's additional terms do not materially alter Wolcott's offer. If Wolcott does not give notification of objection to Sarah's terms within a reasonable time, which of the following will occur? O Due to the Mirror Image Rule, a contract is not founded until both Wolcott and Sarah agree to the same exact terms. ODue to Wolcott's failure to give notification of objection to Sarah's terms within a reasonable time, Sarah's terms will become part of the contract. O Sarah's additional terms constitute a rejection of Wolcott's offer and…
Evaluate when a promise is enforceable, the elements of a contract, performance, and the remedies available in the event of breach.
Explain why access to justice is important to the Rule of Law. What impact could funding cuts to legal aid have on access to justice?