SHANZ Telcom Ltd. employs James as their agent for distribution and sale of their phones & phone Accessories. The agency agreement provides that the agency will last for a period of two years commencing 1st January 2020 to 1st January 2022 and that James will receive a commission of 5% on every SHANZ Item sold. As a student of Business Law with full knowledge on Agency relationships, expound the commitment of SHANZ Telecom Ltd and James in the effective management of their contract.

SHANZ Telcom Ltd. employs James as their agent for distribution and sale of their phones & phone Accessories. The agency agreement provides that the agency will last for a period of two years commencing 1st January 2020 to 1st January 2022 and that James will receive a commission of 5% on every SHANZ Item sold. As a student of Business Law with full knowledge on Agency relationships, expound the commitment of SHANZ Telecom Ltd and James in the effective management of their contract.

Similar questions

Live The Dream Ltd provides a limousine and driver hire service. All of the company’s clients sign the company’s standard contract. The contract includes a clause, within the standard terms and conditions, that states: ‘Live The Dream Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any financial loss, property damage or personal injury incurred during the hire period’. Leona hired a limousine and driver for her 40th birthday night out. She signed the standard contract which included the standard terms and conditions and paid £500, the full cost of the hire, in advance. When Leona was getting into the limousine at the start of her night out, the vehicle was nudged from behind by a passing car. As a result, the limousine rolled forward and ran over Leona’s foot. Leona’s foot was badly bruised and Leona was in too much pain to continue with her birthday night out. The other vehicle involved drove off, and all subsequent attempts to identify the vehicle and the driver failed. Live The Dream Ltd…
Martha sells goods to James for $25,000. Martha assigns her right to receive the $25,000 to XYZ Finance James refuses to pay XYZ the $25,000. James makes two arguments for not paying. First James claims that XYZ has no privity of contract and that XYZ is not a third-party beneficiary of its contract with Martha. Second – James claims that the goods were worthless. Assume that the goods were worthless. You are the judge. Who wins and why? Address both arguments that James makes.
A pizza parlor owner uses a vending machine company to service his soft drinks.The owner of the company sells his route to Mr X and delegates all of his contractsincluding the one with the pizza parlor. This enrages the pizza parlor owner, because Mr. X was engaged to the pizza parlor owner's sister and left her standing at the altar. He claims that the obligation is non-delegable because it's "personal". Do you agree
Cheeseboro Conglomerate Co. entered into a contract with Fanning Heating & Cooling Corp. for the sale of its mineral holdings. The transaction is beyond Cheeseboro's powers. Which of the following parties, for the reason stated, may properly assert the lack of powers in order to challenge and try to stop or undo the sale? O Cheeseboro Conglomerate Co., but only to change the terms of the contract (not stop or undo the sale). O Fanning Heating & Cooling Corp. O A shareholder of Cheeseboro Conglomerate Co. O Fanning Heating & Cooling Corp., but only to change the terms of the contract (not stop or undo the sale). O Cheeseboro Conglomerate Co.
Fiona, Celine and Donna have recently commenced a business together making custard pies using the name 'FCD's Custard Pies' as their trading name. They also sell coffee and soft drinks. Only Donna has put capital into the business, and no formal agreement exists between them. However, on many occasions Fiona has purchased stock for the business from their various suppliers by using her own money, and she has also set up an account with the suppliers in the name of 'FCD's Custard Pies'. Celine also has often placed orders on behalf of the business with their various suppliers for stock. 00:0 At their next meeting Fiona suggests selling alcoholic beverages. Donna likes the idea, but Celine does not. Celine says that such a change would require renovation of the shop, and also obtaining a licence to sell alcohol. This requires an application to the relevant government authority, which may reject the application. After giving it lots of thought, Donna decides to leave the business in two…
On April 1, Orizon LLC sent Jim Stevens a letter via overnight delivery, offering to employ him to audit Orizon, LLC’s financial statements for the current year for $10,000. In the letter, Orizon, LLC stated that Jim had ten days to accept. On April 5, Jim sent Orizon, LLC a fax that stated, "The price for the audit seems too low. Would you consider paying $12,000?" Orizon, LLC received the fax. The next day, Serena Williams heard about the offer to Jim and said to Orizon, LLC, “I will accept that offer!” On learning of Serena’s statement, Jim immediately e-mailed Orizon, LLC agreeing to do the work for $10,000. Orizon, LLC received this e-mail on April 7. 1. Explain in detail why Orizon, LLC and Jim do, or do not, have a contract. 2. If you did not discuss it already, would applying the mailbox rule change your answer in #1? 3. Can Serena accept this offer?
Granite Insurance Company entered into a treaty reinsurance agreement with Rock Solid Reinsurance (RSR). Granite's retention limit is $400,000 and RSR agreed to provide reinsurance for up to $2.0 million. If Granite writes an $800,000 policy, RSR is responsible for 50 percent of the losses. If Granite insures a $1.6 million risk, RSR is responsible for 75 percent of any losses. What type of reinsurance arrangement did Granite enter into with RSR? ما A) reinsurance pool B) surplus share reinsurance C) facultative reinsurance D) excess of loss reinsurance
Andrew is an accountant. He agrees with George, a garage proprietor, that he will assist George with his annual tax return if George will service his car for him on the Monday. At the beginning of the negotiations Andrew told George that he absolutely must have the car for the following Tuesday since he needed it to go to an important meeting with a client to pitch for a valuable deal. Andrew assists George, but because the service was not done correctly the car breaks down when Andrew is on the way to the important meeting. Andrew is very late for this meeting and as a result the client switches his work, worth some £25,000, to another accountant. In addition Andrew incurs £500 costs putting right the defective service. Andrew now wishes to sue George for damages for breach of contract. Question 20 Is Andrew’s claim against George for putting right the defective service A a normal loss B an abnormal loss C neither a normal nor an abnormal loss D both a normal and an abnormal loss…
Amanda and Emilia are co-directors and members of Griffin Pty Ltd, which imports widgets from Vietnam and sells them in various hardware stores in regional NSW. Griffin has a medium-sized warehouse where it stocks goods, and from which it distributes products. Griffin recently signed a contract to supply a large hardware store in Orange and Dubbo with widgets. So the company ordered 10 pallets of widgets from its Vietnamese supplier and also paid a substantial deposit. A shipping company who carries goods into Australia has already brought the pallets into the country and has sent their bill to Griffin. After a couple of deliveries to the hardware store, a safety issue is discovered with the widgets and the government bans the sale of the widgets. the hardware store cancels all further orders of the widgets. Now, Griffin has no future revenue and its remaining stock of widgets cannot be sold. The shipping company is demanding payment of its invoice; there are also several…
Mr. Oliver entered into contract with his friend Mr. Green to transport some material in two weeks’ time. About a month before the delivery was to be made, the material was banned by the legislature, and so delivery was not possible. Mr. Green could have been arrested by the police if he was caught delivering the goods, but he delivered it anyway. Mr. Oliver refuses to pay. i. What can you say about the contract Mr. Oliver and Mr. Green entered into? ii. Should Mr. Green have made the delivery? why or why not? iii. Can Mr. Green enforce payment? why or why not. iv. What was the impact of the legislative action on the contract?
Samantha signs a contract to buy a brand-new unit in Kogarah. The contract is subject to an extended settlement period of 120 days. Samantha, through her solicitor, transfers the 10% deposit to the vendor’s solicitor and then speaks with her mortgage broker about obtaining a loan. While all this is going on, Samantha sells her own unit in Oatley. She intends to use the money realised from the sale of the Oatley unit to pay the balance of the purchase price of the Kogarah unit. A problem arises when Samantha’s unit does not sell by the expected date. Samantha needed to secure short-term finance at an almost exorbitant interest rate just so she can buy the Kogarah unit. Samantha consults her solicitor, who advises her that she can sue the buyer of her Oatley unit for breach of contract and ask for damages including the additional interest charges she incurred. Is Samantha’s solicitor correct? Explain pls
Farmer grows and sells blueberries. Maine Wild Blueberry Co. agreed to buy all of Farmer’s crop for the next two years under a contract that left the price to be determined. Farmer delivered all of the blueberries he was able to harvest. However, a dispute arose over the amount of blueberries Maine will accept and the price it has to pay. Is there an enforceable contract? If so, what is the amount of blueberries Maine must accept and at what price? Discuss is detail.